• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
face_of_sleeping_kitten.jpg

The time has come...
 
1280-BlueMosqueCat.jpg

No thread has ever needed this more...

We've gone round and round this subject for months now. Christopheria will always see what he wants to see. Let's have some fuzzy kittens instead.
 
A thought experiment.

You're standing in a field, looking at a cow.

A man comes up to you and tells you it's a rabbit.

How long do you argue with him about this, before just walking away and leaving him to his own devices?

Does it really matter if gets the last word? If he never changes his mind?

Also:

 
Last edited:
So you admit that we cannot see a concrete core in that photo?

Correct, it is up to 80 feet below the top floor. Most importantly is that no steel core columns are seen. the columns labeleed "MASSIVE BOX COLUMNS" are the only columns even near the core and they are outside of the concrete acting to suppor the outer forms.
 
Last edited:
[qimg]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i133/delphi_ote/1280-BlueMosqueCat.jpg[/qimg]
No thread has ever needed this more...

We've gone round and round this subject for months now. Christopheria will always see what he wants to see. Let's have some fuzzy kittens instead.

That's the way real Americans do it. Nice, warm fuzzy feelings. Now go watch the news.
 
That's because you ASSUME that there were cutting charges, an entirely circular line of reasoning.

On the left is a tempered steel column that was 1300 foot tall, continuous, butt welded.


You certainly have not provided and explanation. This does Cutting charges built into the floors does explain the cut columns and what is happening here.


None of which show concrete. You're saying that one shows box columns, and THEN we see rebar ?

Yes, the spire is an interio box column, not inside the core area, and the other is rebar which is center inside the concrete shear wall. Four such walls comprise the tunular concrete core.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Christopheria, you are repeating yourself. Either come up with a coherent argument or support your current hypothesis with evidence (I don't care if it's raw or cooked.) Until then, we will enjoy these soothing pictures of fuzzy animals...
5thGRRASweetDreams.jpg

This one has a little bit for the dog and kitten lovers.
 
For god's sakes. Is there anybody here who doesn't think this wack job is completly detached from reality?

He willfully ignores evidence presented to him. He relies on a Canadian high school website for support. He points to empty space and says there's a concrete wall there.



Oh BTW, theres a documentary on the History channel about the people who were trapped in the WTC elevators. It's called "Trapped in the towers".
 
Last edited:
For god's sakes. Is there anybody here who doesn't think this wack job is completly detached from reality?

If the side of a tower blows out it is called premature explosion not "detached from reality". You are ignoring your responsibility.

He willfully ignores evidence presented to him.

I don't ignore what your term "evidence". I debunk your misrepresentations such as trying to term the elevator guide rail supports as "core columns. They are "MASSIVE BOX COLUMNS" which only exist outside the core area.

He relies on a Canadian high school website for support. He points to empty space and says there's a concrete wall there.

What is empty about the space in the core area?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom