• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks all. Yes, maybe I should stop posting in this thread for a while. I get so bloody anoyed by him.
 
uruk said:
Ok, lets take a closer look at what those fine elements are.
If you look at the photos below you will see that what you point as rebar is actually JPEG compression errors and dust trails.
The following video confirms the dust trail following the columns.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eO2cQOC7hxY
Look at 00:37 for the dust trail following the column
and look at 00:46 and 00:47 to see the "spire" falling straight down which also corresponds with the pictures.
Click to expand...

That's quite a colossal effort on your part, Uruk.
 
Thank you, maccy. Your post describes Chrisophorous well.

Further, it helps me understand my own feelings of discomfort when contemplating this awful thread. I think that uninstructed laymen (i.e., people like me) often feel fear when facing a paranoid. There’s a folk-belief that such people are physically dangerous, and apparently even here in cyber-world we can experience that uneasy prickling of the back hairs.

Your suggestions are well taken too. Responding to this poor loonie does no good, and it probably does harm. Some would say that they don’t mind doing harm to an odious object like Christo, but I think it’s safer just to leave him alone. After all, those instinctive feelings of menace might have some basis in reality.
 
Christophera said:
Time for you to actually do something. Like come up with an image of the steel core columns inside the core area at some elevation above the ground.
Click to expand...

I have, but your memory is amazinly selective. But I'll repost or direct you to some of my previous posts:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2033615&postcount=6032
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1956562&postcount=4315
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2027988&postcount=5755
 
uruk said:
Thanks. It just goes to show what alot of free time I have to waste on this lunatic.
Click to expand...

What do you hope to achieve by this?

At the end of the month it will have been 6 months snce Christophera first posted about a theory which is self-evidently absurd and which has been proven wrong every day since then.

I don't think that he is ever going to admit that he is deluded.

Your replies have been brilliant, rigorous and surprisingly patient - I'd love to see that talent applied where it will actually make a difference.
 
maccy said:
What do you hope to achieve by this?

At the end of the month it will have been 6 months snce Christophera first posted about a theory which is self-evidently absurd and which has been proven wrong every day since then.
Click to expand...

Certainly an outright lie when not one image of any of the supposed 47, 1,300 fot steel core columns has been produced while prodigious evidence for the concrete core, also disproving steel core columns has been consistently provided.

And this provision of raw evidence has always been done in an effort to provide knowledge which can be used to establish lawful government and protect life, while,........... the opposition will not even state their reasons for opposing what must be the truth.
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
I know raw core evidence and you have no evidence at all.
Click to expand...


that isn't a "raw" evidence of anything but a dark structure, that is unclear, behind a cloud of smoke

Like we aksed you before, please provide images of the cores from their time of construction.
 
Christophera said:
Is that why no one survived above impact on WTC 1?
Click to expand...


they survived until the building collapsed. since wtc 1 was impacted straight on, this also cut off the stairwell access for the floors above the impact area and prevented people from escaping.
 
Arus808 said:
that isn't a "raw" evidence of anything but a dark structure, that is unclear, behind a cloud of smoke

Like we aksed you before, please provide images of the cores from their time of construction.
Click to expand...

The perpetrators of 9-11 removed that information prior to 9-11. We still have good information on the concrete core tho but NOT for steel core columns.

Like I've always asked. Please provide raw evidence of any of the 47, 1,300 foot steel core columns at some elevation ove rthe ground as I have of the core and its concrete shear wall.

And if you cannot provide that please explain WHY you persist in denying competent raw evidence of deception by FEMA when it is common knowledge that due process was violated in 3000 capiol crimes.
 
Christophera said:
The perpetrators of 9-11 removed that information prior to 9-11. We still have good information on the concrete core tho but NOT for steel core columns.

Like I've always asked. Please provide raw evidence of any of the 47, 1,300 foot steel core columns at some elevation ove rthe ground as I have of the core and its concrete shear wall.

And if you cannot provide that please explain WHY you persist in denying competent raw evidence of deception by FEMA when it is common knowledge that due process was violated in 3000 capiol crimes.
Click to expand...

Raw evidence is actually having the cores available. You do not have this. You have pictures from far away with low resolution that do not prove any concrete.

Why do you ignore the pictures of the WTC beign contructed with the steel core?
 
Christophera said:
The perpetrators of 9-11 removed that information prior to 9-11. We still have good information on the concrete core tho but NOT for steel core columns.
Click to expand...

so you going to ingnore books and publications including testimony by those involved in the construction and design of the twin towers in the 80's.

Are you claiming that the "perpetrators" of 9/11 (al Queda) knew back then that they were going to attack the twin towers?


Like I've always asked. Please provide raw evidence of any of the 47, 1,300 foot steel core columns at some elevation ove rthe ground as I have of the core and its concrete shear wall.
Click to expand...


funny that's what we've been asking from you for the past 180 pages of this thread.

AGain, what you have is not raw evidence of any sort.

RAW evidence we want from you
1) the blueprints
2) the testimony of workers who were involved
3) images taken during their construction untouched and altered by anyone.

If you cannot provide these above, then you have shown yourself to be intellectually dishonest (oh what a surprise)
 
maccy said:
What do you hope to achieve by this?

At the end of the month it will have been 6 months snce Christophera first posted about a theory which is self-evidently absurd and which has been proven wrong every day since then.

I don't think that he is ever going to admit that he is deluded.

Your replies have been brilliant, rigorous and surprisingly patient - I'd love to see that talent applied where it will actually make a difference.
Click to expand...

It's like cocaine. I try to stay away. BUT I KEEP COMING BACK FOR MORE!!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom