Star Wars Beam Weapon and the WTC Bathtub

PooperScooper321... what the hell are those pictures with the dots suppose to prove? That you lack artistic skills? Also, did you notice all the debris inside the holes in those pictures you posted? I guess not.
 
I think BS4-5=9 is actually having a laugh here, I can only assume this.

Admittedly it is not very funny but when you have mocked this event to the degree he is as, I'm sure one more laugh at it is highly amusing.

Carry on BS, mocking and laughting at it all clearly appeals to you.

There is a saying here in
Scotland.

"What goes around comes around".

I'm sure one day it will BS.
 
PooperScooper321... what the hell are those pictures with the dots suppose to prove? That you lack artistic skills? Also, did you notice all the debris inside the holes in those pictures you posted? I guess not.
He's basically saying...

laser.jpg


"Look at what my evil, billion dollar, star wars beam weapon did, muhahahahahah!"
 
[qimg]http://www.acebaker.com/9-11/Holes5-6part1.gif[/qimg]

Did you have fun placing red dots at random places ?

You missed a few, by the way.


Now, I'd agree that it's kinda funny how those round-ish shapes seem all over the place, but to jump to the conclusion that there's a "beam weapon" involved, without evidence, and contra the fact that beams weapons are FOCUSED into a narrow beam, is ridiculous.
 
So why did the Death Ray O' Doom totally vapourize the towers, but only pepper the other buildings with a shotgun spread of holes? Were they just trying to be artistic?

Why wouldn't they have been satisfied with just smacking these buildings with a shiftload of falling debris? Not fun enough?

"YeeHah! I'm the NWO, Beeatch!!" "WooHoo!"*




*my model of the guys running the Gun of Death ray O' Doom. Sort of like the sensitive cops in Hitchhiker's Guide, but not as Sensitive.
 
And why is that one little yellow dot off to the left side a different size? Did they have two Death Rays O' Doom? Or was that a bank shot?
 
Because you never know when you'll need to go down that rabbit hole, it's best to carry one with you.
 
SEE?!??!!!??? Billiard balls!!! Told ya!!!
OK, OK, I'll admit maybe a space based billiard ball weapon was also employed to destroy WTC 5 and 6 (what an earth for I don't know?).

So in conclusion the evidence presented shows Dr. Evil used his new "star wars beam weapon" and "billiard ball weapon of mass destruction" (BBWMD) on 9/11 to destroy WTC 5 and 6!

:eek:
 
TS1234, it's well known that all the beam weapons currently in deployment are triangular-shaped. Please draw your picture again using triangles.
 
So why did the Death Ray O' Doom totally vapourize the towers, but only pepper the other buildings with a shotgun spread of holes? Were they just trying to be artistic?

Why wouldn't they have been satisfied with just smacking these buildings with a shiftload of falling debris? Not fun enough?

"YeeHah! I'm the NWO, Beeatch!!" "WooHoo!"*

*my model of the guys running the Gun of Death ray O' Doom. Sort of like the sensitive cops in Hitchhiker's Guide, but not as Sensitive.
In my mind I have this vision of Egon Spengler on Ghostbusters firing off his proton stream in the function room at the hotel...

egon.JPG


"OK! OK! Alright, hold it! Hold it! Whoa Whoa Whoa Whoa Whoa! ... Nice shooting, Tex! You've just destroyed WTC 5 and 6 dumbass that wasn't in the plan you'll ruin the cover up!"

:D
 
Last edited:
In my mind I have this vision of Egon Spengler on Ghostbusters firing off his proton stream in the function room at the hotel...

[qimg]http://www.mugen.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/egon.JPG[/qimg]

"OK! OK! Alright, hold it! Hold it! Whoa Whoa Whoa Whoa Whoa! ... Nice shooting, Tex! You've just destroyed WTC 5 and 6 dumbass that wasn't in the plan you'll ruin the cover up!"

:D

Well, all theories are valid, we're just snarking here....
 
TS1234, it's well known that all the beam weapons currently in deployment are triangular-shaped. Please draw your picture again using triangles.

haha, funny.

All kidding aside, though, I'd anticipate this Beam Weapon o' Doom to have a significant and noticeable diffraction limited effect, given the size of the beam, it's anticipated origin, and the power levels involved.

You'd almost surely see a Gaussian distribution of damage, leaving quite ordinary craters. The only alternative would be to see Fraunhofer patterns. Clean-edged circles, though -- just not possible.

Pathetic. Even if you buy every step of his argument, it still points 180 degrees away from his conclusions...
 

Back
Top Bottom