• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christophera said:
If I was doing an investigation. Which I am not. I know what the core was and am simply finding raw evidence that shows what I know existed.


I am telling what the core was.

You cannot prove it otherwise, or the core you think was there.
Click to expand...

You keep talking about "raw evidence" please produce it for I am getting hungry.
 
Christophera said:
I know I've got it when the cat poops.
Click to expand...

Well, sometimes i am a clown because i dont take
live as serious like others do in here.

But let me ask you, Christophera - and give me the
chance for an answer that i can understand.

"God´s ways are not understandable" - that´s a german
phrase and if you believe in god you don´t question the
way he does things. Why are you questioning his decisions
nevertheless?

I don´t remember your actual age but if you did not lie
within your posts on the internet, you´re about 58 years
old, wrong?

So if you are in this age - wouldn´t you love to left some
positive things after you left this world? Something positive
that makes it reasonable for your whole existence?

- Oliver :)
 
Christophera said:
To: Psycho ollie.

The delay system for the core was 2 different systems, the lower one was slower, somwhat unpredictable maybe.

I've explained this perhaps 10 times here. Can you miss it again?

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1232703
Click to expand...

low oxygen water killed the core of the WTC, it dissolved first due to city air, then the fire was able to destroy it!

normally the algae keeps the concrete core protected from the environmental effects of evil city air! But due to low oxygen water, the algae died, exposed the concrete core, the rest is history!

could not of solved this without your web site!!!
 
Christophera said:
Basicaly all of you have no raw evidence whatsoever for the 47, steel core columns.

What a miserable place to argue from.

GOT EVIDENCE?

<snip spam>
Click to expand...

And you are a proven liar.

GOT EVIDENCE?


Christophera is a liar,
Says there was a dying fire,
Added more lies on top of that,
Could not prove them, oh, how sad.
 
Oliver said:
Well, sometimes i am a clown because i dont take
live as serious like others do in here.

But let me ask you, Christophera - and give me the
chance for an answer that i can understand.

"God´s ways are not understandable" - that´s a german
phrase and if you believe in god you don´t question the
way he does things. Why are you questioning his decisions
nevertheless?

I don´t remember your actual age but if you did not lie
within your posts on the internet, you´re about 58 years
old, wrong?

So if you are in this age - wouldn´t you love to left some
positive things after you left this world? Something positive
that makes it reasonable for your whole existence?

- Oliver :)
Click to expand...

I´m waiting for your response, Chris Alfred...
 
Christophera said:
Basicaly all of you have no raw evidence whatsoever for the 47, steel core columns.

What a miserable place to argue from.

GOT EVIDENCE?

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
Click to expand...
Chris,I think you are only person on the planet that doesn't believe the Towers had steel core columns.

Even the immensely nutty scholars accept there were 47 steel columns.

Controlled demolition was also suggested by the fact that the collapses were total, with the 110-story Twin Towers collapsing into a pile of rubble only a few stories high. The core of each tower had consisted of 47 massive steel columns, which extended from the basements through the roofs. Even if we ignore all the other problems in the official "pancake" theory of the collapses, those massive steel columns should have still been sticking up a thousand feet in the air. Zelikow’s commission handled this problem with the audacious claim that "[t]he interior core of the buildings was a hollow steel shaft."
Click to expand...

http://www.septembereleventh.org/newsarchive/2005-07-29-pressclub.php
 
Christophera said:
So, ......... if you understood what I meant, is grammer more important than justice in the case of 3,000 capitol crimes?
Click to expand...

Objection - speculation!

I can assure you that I have NO IDEA what you meant. In fact, that was my point.

Answer this question: Are the facts about 9/11 clear OR are they illogical???

You can't have it both ways. Either the facts are clear or they are illogical.

A nice straw-man though - if I lived on a farm I would use it to scare away crows.

As for your new question: Is grammar (once again suggesting that correct spelling is the tool of the government) more important than justice in the case of 3,000 capitol crimes?

Well, for your conspiracy theory to be valid, somewhere in the range of at least a million government employees/WTC employees/military/structural engineers/New World Order Rulers had to be in somehow on the conspiracy.

How would you present that in a simple, succinct sentence? Here are the lexemes for you to use:

"3,000; 1,000,000; deaths; for;of; people; responsible; the; were."

If I don't use correct grammar and word order, I can form those lexemes into this:

"3,000 people were responsible for the deaths of 1,000,000."

Which is semantically VERY different from what was originally intended.

MY POINT BEING

IF YOU CANNOT PRESENT YOUR IDEAS IN A LOGICAL, WELL ORDERED AND CLEAR MANNER, THEN NOONE WILL BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND YOU EVEN IF YOU ARE CORRECT.

AND IF YOU CANNOT PRESENT YOUR IDEAS IN A LOGICAL, WELL ORDERED AND CLEAR MANNER, IT SUGGESTS THAT MAYBE YOU YOURSELF ARE NOT A VERY LOGICAL, CLEAR THINKER. WHICH WOULD CAST YOUR RESULTS INTO DOUBT.

​
So either learn to express yourself clearly, or learn to lose.

You have repeatedly posted the same photo over and over again. If you could please at least edit the photo to obviously circle the evidence you are supposedly showing - I'm sick of seeing the same link in every second reply you post. Especially when other people are posting counter-evidence in the form of numerous photos.​
 
Mobyseven said:
Objection - speculation!

I can assure you that I have NO IDEA what you meant. In fact, that was my point.

Answer this question: Are the facts about 9/11 clear OR are they illogical???

You can't have it both ways. Either the facts are clear or they are illogical.

A nice straw-man though - if I lived on a farm I would use it to scare away crows.

As for your new question: Is grammar (once again suggesting that correct spelling is the tool of the government) more important than justice in the case of 3,000 capitol crimes?

Well, for your conspiracy theory to be valid, somewhere in the range of at least a million government employees/WTC employees/military/structural engineers/New World Order Rulers had to be in somehow on the conspiracy.

How would you present that in a simple, succinct sentence? Here are the lexemes for you to use:

"3,000; 1,000,000; deaths; for;of; people; responsible; the; were."

If I don't use correct grammar and word order, I can form those lexemes into this:

"3,000 people were responsible for the deaths of 1,000,000."

Which is semantically VERY different from what was originally intended.

MY POINT BEING

IF YOU CANNOT PRESENT YOUR IDEAS IN A LOGICAL, WELL ORDERED AND CLEAR MANNER, THEN NOONE WILL BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND YOU EVEN IF YOU ARE CORRECT.

AND IF YOU CANNOT PRESENT YOUR IDEAS IN A LOGICAL, WELL ORDERED AND CLEAR MANNER, IT SUGGESTS THAT MAYBE YOU YOURSELF ARE NOT A VERY LOGICAL, CLEAR THINKER. WHICH WOULD CAST YOUR RESULTS INTO DOUBT.

​
So either learn to express yourself clearly, or learn to lose.

You have repeatedly posted the same photo over and over again. If you could please at least edit the photo to obviously circle the evidence you are supposedly showing - I'm sick of seeing the same link in every second reply you post. Especially when other people are posting counter-evidence in the form of numerous photos.​
Click to expand...

So very convienent when you have no evidence of steel core columns when there is qualified evidence of the concrete core.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
 
This thread is over for me - it was fun for a while, but by responding to the BS and idiocy we are only reinforcing his belief in it. I'm off to find a non-redundant thread where maybe we could have a meaningful debate.

Adios amigos...
 
Mobyseven said:
Answer this question: Are the facts about 9/11 clear OR are they illogical???

You can't have it both ways. Either the facts are clear or they are illogical.
Click to expand...


I would say the facts about the CT are clearly illogical. How's that?
 
Christophera said:
Spelling is not important here.
Click to expand...

Well, typos at least aren't important (tho I hate it when I do that). But reallly, Chris, if you want me not to get the giggles every time I see it, please learn the diff between "capital" (crimes) and "capitol."

The latter word stands for a building, and is usually capitalized.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom