Star Wars Beam Weapon and the WTC Bathtub

How did the star wars beam half burn this car......in Vermont?! Gosh maybe there's a warp in the time/space continuum?

exit17_05.jpg


But seriously, cars CAN half burn. As for the police car photo you posted well that car is under the FDR Drive, which is quite a bit from ground zero. What makes you think that an undated, uncredited photo even has anything to do with 9/11? Oh yeah, the beam people told you so.
 
This thread is now getting massively surreal. TS1234 - is your argument really that a picture of a car, that has small holes in it, is evidence that a secret beam weapon fired by the government destroyed the twin towers. Really? Really really?
 
Well, I do, and it's lousy megawatt-class weapons. That means in order to generate the same energy as the aircraft impact -- not counting the fuel on board or any other consumable, just the kinetic energy -- would take over an hour of continuous firing. It can't keep that up, by the way.
I can't wait to see Truthseeker twist that quote around to suit himself.
"R. Mackey, who works for NASA, admits that it would take over an hour for a beam weapon to bring down a skyscraper. And, isn't this a coincidence, the towers took OVER AN HOUR to collapse!"
Don't try to frighten us with your sorceror's ways, Truthseeker1234.

Actually, isn't he also arguing for controlled demolition in other threads? So the government planted explosives in the towers, crashed planes into them, and then shot at them from space with a laser?

I've heard of overkill, but...
 
Guys and gals, please, have a look and a read.

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam4.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html

Do you find easy explanations for these observations? There are melted cars. THere are many round holes bored down through the debris. WHere is WTC5? The south part of the building just disappeared. If this stuff is so easily explained, then explain it to me.

What about these holes?
if you think this is in any way inconsistant with 2 110 story skyscrapers collapsing and fires everywhere please tell us what you think this is consistant with

BTW, as far as the "odd" broken windows go, try putting a glass bottle near a fire so it heat up, then dump a bit of water on it, see if it shatters
 
Do you find easy explanations for these observations? There are melted cars. THere are many round holes bored down through the debris. WHere is WTC5? The south part of the building just disappeared. If this stuff is so easily explained, then explain it to me.

What about these holes?
We've already had these discussions with you, and there was a whole thread devoted to this issue recently: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=66906

There you will find the following quotes. Use the search function next time.

Q: Was there a lot of burning debris around or anything?

A: Not that we were able to hit. But there was a parking lot I think on the corner of Vesey. I'm not sure. I think it was the corner ov Vesey and West. I'm pretty sure, yeah. On the southwest corner of Vesey and West, there was a parking lot that was just roaring. Every car was transmitting to the next car. This was between the two collapses, I think. –Firefighter Kevin Monahan

We went back to Vesey and West Street and started moving the ambulances back towards North End more, and then we started going northbound on North End towards Murray Street. We were moving the triage because we got a report of the parking lot in front of the building we were in, some of the cars were on fire, and we got reports of gas lines that were blown and the fire were starting to get to them. So we ended up moving the triage initially, and we just started heading northbound to Murray Street. –Paramedic Kevin Darnowski
Tell us, TS, what's your most educated guess about what caused the holes in the roofs of WTC 4, 5, and 6? Think hard. Think about your childrens' education. You can do this.
 
Tell us, TS, what's your most educated guess about what caused the holes in the roofs of WTC 4, 5, and 6? Think hard. Think about your childrens' education. You can do this.

[sarcasm] There were spherical containers of anti-matter on the roof of WTC2. That would do it. [/sarcasm]
 
Last edited:
There were spherical containers of anti-matter on the roof of WTC2. That would do it.

Anti-Matter? ANTI-MATTER?! Just out of curiousity: How BIG were those containers?


I'm asking because no scientist AFAIK have been able to produce anti-matter in amounts larger than a few atoms.
Not to mention the fact that anti-matter in the amount BSSprouter implicate would blast Manhattan, and most of North America, right of the globe.
 
There were spherical containers of anti-matter on the roof of WTC2. That would do it.

Damn, not even Christophera would buy that theory.

Pray tell, buster, what were these "containers" made of? Why were they spherical? And, most importantly, why was there no incredible shower of hard gamma radiation corresponding to the WTC collapses?

If I've learned anything from the CT's, it's that no matter how stupid they get, they always find a way to top themselves. I can't wait for the next iteration after this laugher.
 
Yes, anti-matter comment was sarcastic. It is born of my puzzlement however. There is just a lot of matter missing. We are supposed to believe that falling debris carved these holes, but the debris isn't there. WTC6 is hollowed out down to the ground.

Gravy, I'm happy to be quoted in your hit piece, as long as you get the context right.

How's this for my statement on the holes:

I'm puzzled as to how so many round holes were bored straight down through buildings, rubble, and the street. It does not seem possible that they were caused by falling debris, because of the roundness, and the distinct lack of sizeable debris in these holes. Dr. Judy Wood has hypothesized the use of high energy beam weapons, and I am intrigued by this hypothesis. I seek other explanations as well.

That statement along with the correct pictures would be very interesting to your readers.
 
Last edited:
Gravy, I'm coming out with a website called "HUNT THE RUBBLE (a friendly game of hide and seek)". Should be up in a few days. I'm sure you'll find material there you can work with.
 
Yes, anti-matter comment was sarcastic.
Said the guy who thinks that the Twin Towers may have been destroyed by "beam weapons," and who can't find rubble in photos of Ground Zero.

Gravy, I'm happy to be quoted in your hit piece, as long as you get the context right.

How's this for my statement on the holes:

"I'm puzzled as to how so many round holes were bored straight down through buildings, rubble, and the street. It does not seem possible that they were caused by falling debris, because of the roundness, and the distinct lack of sizeable debris in these holes. Dr. Judy Wood has hypothesized the use of high energy beam weapons, and I am intrigued by this hypothesis. I seek other explanations as well."

That statement along with the correct pictures would be very interesting to your readers.

Gravy, I'm coming out with a website called "HUNT THE RUBBLE (a friendly game of hide and seek)". Should be up in a few days. I'm sure you'll find material there you can work with.
These quotes are outstanding! Keep 'em coming, CJ!

8790454eef1f902bf.jpg



8790454ef1a7edbef.jpg


8790454ef1f177b72.jpg
 
Last edited:
http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image180.jpg

Here's the truck that has the windows blown out but is otherwise undamaged.
Bwahaha! Who said the windows were blown out? Judy Wood? The end windows roll down and the center window slides fore and aft.

Do you know why firefighters so often drive with the windows open, CJ?

To stay cool, silly!

Get it? Is any of this sinking in, CJ? Think of your childrens' education! Some day they're going to read your work here, for crying out loud!

OMG! My guys got hit with a beam weapon! That's like, so uncool!

8790454ef82f04559.jpg
 
Last edited:
Guys and gals, please, have a look and a read.

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam4.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html

Do you find easy explanations for these observations? There are melted cars. THere are many round holes bored down through the debris. WHere is WTC5? The south part of the building just disappeared. If this stuff is so easily explained, then explain it to me.

What about these holes?

BS has you taken a course in ignoring the bleeding obvious?

Over here in the UK it is morning, I know this because I have just got out of bed, it is daylight outside and everybody is grumpy. I am on my first cup of coffee and my second cigarette. All indications are it is morning, Monday morning in fact. It is bleeding obvious. I do not need it explaining to me.

Now apply this to your holes in the buildings around the Towers. Planes hit the Towers at high speed, they were engulfed in flames and collapsed uncontrollably. Masses of very heavy debris fell from the Towers on top of other buildings. Some of it so heavy and falling with such speed it punctured holes in the top of them. I do not need this explaining to me it is bleeding obvious.

Now excuse me while I muster the energy to face the rest of the day and enjoy my second cup of coffee. Of course you could comfort me by explaining it's not Monday morning, it is not that obvious and I can go back to bed.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom