• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
mortimer said:
Let me see if I have this straight, Chris. You claim that the towers were brought down by controlled demolition. You claim that both towers had a concrete core. South tower had a section of the concrete core that survived for a time because the detonations in that section didn't go off til later. The North tower was completely pulverized by C4-coated rebar, and thus you would never see a section of the core standing in the demo images.

You have claimed that the only evidence of a steel core you would accept is a view of the steel core intact at elevation in a demo image. Now, Chris, if the towers were indeed destroyed by controlled demolition, why would you expect to see steel standing at elevation during the demo? The columns would have been destroyed by cutting charges and would have fallen along with the rest of the building, so there's no way you'd be able to see steel core columns standing in the North tower during the demo.

So, Chris, will you admit that, using your own standard of a core section standing at elevation during the demo as evidence of the core composition, you have NO evidence that the North tower had a concrete core? If you won't admit that, then please provide RAW evidence of the concrete core in the demo images of the North tower.
Click to expand...

If you check the post 2nd above, in reply to delphi_ote you will find your answer.
 
Christophera said:
I provided an answer and you failed to respond.
Click to expand...

Liar.

Typical for a denier to accuse a truth seeker of what the denier is guilty of.

Since you have evaded examining the link which had your answer,

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1232703

I will copy it for you.
Click to expand...
I read your link, but it disagrees with the video I linked. I asked you if you could point out the core standing for a few seconds and finally detonating IN THAT VIDEO. Can you do that? Please? No need to link your site again. We've all read it.

Over ten times a second a floor detonates. Three times a second the core sections follow the floor detonations. You don't really think that within that or the dust/particulate you will see the detonations or the core do you?
Click to expand...
Whoa, are you saying that the explosions wouldn't disturb the dust at all? That's what I was looking for. I couldn't see it. Oh, and no core still standing after initial "detonations".

There is only one opportunity to see the core without any steel around it and that is when the upper core detonation system switches to the lower core system. There is however a video that shows the concrete core with the interior box columns around it, partially. WTC 2 is seen left of WTC 1.

Other than that WTC 1 is shrouded in dust through that phase. WTC 2 provides the only glimpse of the concrete core.
Click to expand...

The video I linked is of WTC 2. So... Where is the core?
 
Garb said:
In all honesty, does it even matter now?

Either way, I saw a dictator that murdered his own people, intimidated to keep himself in power, and was looking to get WMDs and use them on other countries.
Click to expand...

Off course it does matter. They are still dying down there.
Saddam was installed by the US-Gov. IMHO the Gov should
care more about their own affairs instead casting the stones
around in the muslim world.

Also IMHO i think they never should have interfere anymore
after the russian invasion was defeated. It´s not the western
world business as long we let them live their lives and accept
the same about the western world.
 
No politics in this thread, please. It's long enough as it is.

Now, back to the crazy person.
:popcorn1
 
hey chris, i realise there are lot of questions asked of you here but please could you answer the ones below i posted several days ago?

bonavada said:
hey chris......you've been at this a very long time now, but there are some basic general questions i think need answering by you.

you believe the WTC was destroyed not by islamic extremists but by americans? i'll take that as read.

so please, why would these people:-

wait so long after the planes crashed before setting off the C4? why not explode the charges immediately following the impacts? this would have caused many more casualties = even greater outrage = more excuses for overseas adventurism.

allow the south tower to collapse first? why not blow the north tower as this was hit first?

and:-
why bother steering a jet plane into each prior to CD anyway? if the buildings were so effectively rigged for CD as you insist, why the overkill? why not the government/whoever "simply" concoct evidence that terrorists planted bombs in the buildings prior to 9/11?
Click to expand...

BV
 
Powa said:
No politics in this thread, please. It's long enough as it is.

Now, back to the crazy person.
:popcorn1
Click to expand...

You´re right. Back to Alfred.

Here´s the reason for his concrete core. You may
want to study it to understand it. God bless - I didn´t understand it.

http://forum.cygnus-study.com/showthread.php?t=4889&highlight=Unifyer
http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/elections_j_072400.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20000617113905/home.earthlink.net/~argus1/personal.html
http://www.truthasaur.com/
http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&q=argus1@earthlink.net&btnG=Google-Suche&meta=
 
From the thread in Oliver's first link, in response to Chris' paranoid ramblings:

FWalk said:
Here's another number for you to add to your list of 21, 22, and 23.

295.30 - it's the DSM-IV diagnosis number for paranoid schizophrenia.
Click to expand...

:D
 
Christophera, you STILL HAVE NOT ANSWERED why the towers' detonation started at the exact spot where the planes hit, allthough the planes hit the wrong towers.
 
Bell said:
Christophera, you STILL HAVE NOT ANSWERED why the towers' detonation started at the exact spot where the planes hit, allthough the planes hit the wrong towers.
Click to expand...

Also Christophera, how do you know the buildings were rigged with uhmplosives? How do you know that the concrete bore had 3" rebar on 4' centers coated with C4 in them? Was this in the documentary as well? You would not have made this up, now would you?
 
Bell said:
Also Christophera, how do you know the buildings were rigged with uhmplosives? How do you know that the concrete bore had 3" rebar on 4' centers coated with C4 in them? Was this in the documentary as well? You would not have made this up, now would you?
Click to expand...
Of course not!
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
Of course not!
Click to expand...

Oh god! I missed this one. He actually thinks that he
reminds that the BBC told they placed bombs within
the towers? And he saw it XX years ago? And nobody
recognized it when it was aired but him?

Could it get even worse? :boggled: Don´t say it - it
could and did...
 
Gravy said:
Of course not!
Click to expand...

Oooh, thanks for edditing that link, Gravy. I didn't understand it the first time :)

So, the 'documentary' showed how the WTC was build with a concrete bore, and packed with uhmplosives? And yet, nobody mind working in the towers? Riiight...
 
Powa said:
Liar.


I read your link, but it disagrees with the video I linked. I asked you if you could point out the core standing for a few seconds and finally detonating IN THAT VIDEO. Can you do that? Please? No need to link your site again. We've all read it.
Click to expand...

It is not shown there so I cannot point it out meaning you are wrong.

Powa said:
Whoa, are you saying that the explosions wouldn't disturb the dust at all? That's what I was looking for. I couldn't see it. Oh, and no core still standing after initial "detonations".



The video I linked is of WTC 2. So... Where is the core?
Click to expand...


Powa said:
There is only one opportunity to see the core without any steel around it and that is when the upper core detonation system switches to the lower core system. There is however a video that shows the concrete core with the interior box columns around it, partially. WTC 2 is seen left of WTC 1.

Other than that WTC 1 is shrouded in dust through that phase. WTC 2 provides the only glimpse of the concrete core.
Click to expand...

The video I mention is from a building top at probably around 500 feet. Yours is from the street and the debris blowing out ward will cover all view to the core.
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
Sorry to butt in, but Chris has also said it was produced by the BBC. He remembers vividly how they described planting the C-4 during construction. Yes, in 1990, the British Broadcasting Corporation produced and aired a documentary which said the Twin Towers were packed with demolitions explosives. Must be true. Chris remembers it vividly.
Click to expand...

gravy you are misrepresenting what I've stated. If I said the documentary titled "Construction of the Twin Towers" was produced by BBC I was in error. It was produced by PBS. Also, .......... the documentary di not say "it was packed with demolitions explosives". It said there was a special plastic coating on the rebar which was flammable and that only welders with a security clearance could weld it.

This is true intellectual dishonesty colluding with Bell and Ollie.
 
Christophera said:
gravy you are misrepresenting what I've stated. If I said the documentary titled "Construction of the Twin Towers" was produced by BBC I was in error. It was produced by PBS. Also, .......... the documentary di not say "it was packed with demolitions explosives". It said there was a special plastic coating on the rebar which was flammable and that only welders with a security clearance could weld it.

This is true intellectual dishonesty.
Click to expand...

So, how do you know your 3" rebar on 4' centers were packed with C4?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom