Gravy,
Imagine that I am the District Attorney and prove to me explosives were not used.
I have:
1) 40 some firefighter witnesses.
2) Video of squibs similar to CD.
3) 3 steel frame buildings that collapsed straight down all on the same day in the same place for the first time in history. At least one not hit by a plane.
4) Civilian eyewitnesses who reported explosions.
5) A non explanation of WTC 7 from FEMA.
P.S. Don't bring your NIST reports because they are not admissible as evidence in a court. They also failed to test for explosives even if they were.
Russell
Here's a better idea, Russell.
Take your evidence to a D.A. instead of just posting vague non-evidence
ad infinitum on internet forums.
If you cannot or will not do so, here's an alternative proposition.
I will take it to a D.A. for you.
Here's all you have to do. Present your evidence to me in good faith (privately, if you wish) and I will, in good faith, assess it, interview all of those you identify as potential witnesses and present all of the evidence and verbatim transcripts of all of the interviews in their entirety to the D.A. on your behalf if you are unable or unwilling to do so yourself.
To facilitate this, and following your numbering scheme above, all you have to do is:
1) Provide me with the statements or willsays or contact information of your 40 witnesses and I will interview each and every one of them and pass all of the details on to the D.A.
2) Provide the video, and a willsay or contact information of the expert witness who will be back up the assertion that the video shows "squibs similar to CD" and I'll interview the expert you suggest, and pass all of the details on to the D.A.
3) Well, aside from the obvious fact that they didn't collapse "straight down", I will pass on the videos or other evidence that you submit and will pass on the information that the unprecedented events of September 11, 2001 were indeed unprecedented. Of course, the D.A. will also consider all of the unprecedented events of that day and not only the ones that you think point to a conspiracy, but I will still gladly pass this all on.
4) Provide me with the statements or contact information of the civilians you refer to and I will interview each and every one of them and pass the information on to the D.A.
5) I will provide the D.A. with the early FEMA report and the later NIST report and the numerous statements of others at the scene, in the interests of full disclosure. Please pass along the names and contact information of anyone else whose evidence you wish to add to this point and I will interview each and every one of them personally, and pass that along too.
6) *this was your P.S., not numbered, but I numbered it for consistency*. You're wrong about this. The NIST reports are most assuredly admissible as evidence in a criminal trial. So don't fret over that. I'll pass those on the D.A. too.
See? Very, very little work on your part. A huge amount of work on my part. But I'm willing to put your evidence to the test. Are you?
