LCFC - Coming soon to a cinema near you...

Yes I get lots of nuts too - but I have talked with MANY people on the inside of the official story on the phone and in person and you know not of what it is you speak.

No JREF spin will work here because this is first hand.

Did they confess to mass murder...or something else? Care to tell us what they told you, or is it priveleged? Coz, I gotta say - I agree with Chipmunk. If your conspiracy was true, they would be watching you - very closely - but you'd never know it. Most likely, they are being paranoid about truthers because thats their job. Seeing as to how one of them already tried an armed infiltration at(the Bohemian Grove?) - I cant blame them.
 
1200 unique visits per day with an average of 5 pages per visit.

5 pages in what time period?
I can view 5 pages in 10 seconds. Doesn't mean that I read each of those pages.

BTW, I get 2000+ unique hits to a fan website per day on an old 1980's cartoon series. 90% stay longer than 3 minutes.
 
I'm trying to understand what you're getting at here. You presented this chart after I said you couldn't make assumptions about the trends of people's conclusions about 9/11 based on your site visits.

Did the chart have anything to do with that, or were you switching the topic to how much interest the military has taken into your activities?

Are these ideas somehow related?

Here are my suggestions:

1) Talk to FEMA enigneers.
2) Talk to Pentagon rescuers including the officers in charge.
3) Talk to the NTSB agents in charge of the FDR.
4) Attempt to talk with the FBI.
5) Talk to Donald Rumsfeld's personal historian.
6) Talk with eyewitnesses (many).
7) Talk to the Special agents who detained you one day.
8) Talk to the Pentagon police who detained you the other day and deleted your digital photos from your camera.
9) Talk to the Arlington County dispatch center and listen to tapes never released to the public.
10) Talk to various professor level people (non CT) about the videos released.

THEN

Talk with me.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for taking the time to share that!

it is just a return on your tax dollars, you are welcome anytime, my brother sounds just like you, 2.01 GPA Engineer, I treat you just like I treat him.

please take to heart your true disrespect for those who died on 9/11 by passing on each false statement as they stand this very second on your own web site, just my opinion backed up by your disclaimer, a simple disclaimer, you forgot to add you do not care if it is wrong, but you listened to someone here and left out the reason you have wrong stuff, you do not care, and I am only extending to make that reflect you disrespect for those who died on 9/11. If you cared you would not do such shallow research, would you?


I am sure LCFC will not let me down and totally be in my face with lies and disrespect. You don't care anyway, so why respond on how you feel about fiction being passed as a truth movement instrument? Fraud, a movie made as a fictional farce is the bible of many truth movement people. Fraud?

Good luck fixing your site. (try removing it, just kidding, it is self debunking for humorous to most! But cheer up, those who share you PNAC love will suspend all thought processes and suck it up.)

So will LCFC be the big break for you as you appear on stage at those 75 dollar conferences selling soap?
 
Did they confess to mass murder...or something else? Care to tell us what they told you, or is it priveleged? Coz, I gotta say - I agree with Chipmunk. If your conspiracy was true, they would be watching you - very closely - but you'd never know it. Most likely, they are being paranoid about truthers because thats their job. Seeing as to how one of them already tried an armed infiltration at(the Bohemian Grove?) - I cant blame them.

Some of it is agreed under anonymity.

No confessions.

I am not armed.
 
Originally Posted by steve s http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2057500#post2057500http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/helloworld/buttons/viewpost.gif
I predict that LC:FC will be so vague and ambiguous that there won't be any specifics to debunk. Just a bunch of interviews with wackos ranting against the gubmint.

Steve S.




2 to 1, Steve is right

haha, i agree. if the trailer to lc:fc is any indication of what is going to be in it, you've already won.
 
Here are my suggestions:

1) Talk to FEMA enigneers.
2) Talk to Pentagon rescuers including the officers in charge.
3) Talk to the NTSB agents in charge of the FDR.
4) Attempt to talk with the FBI.
5) Talk to Donald Rumsfeld's personal historian.
6) Talk with eyewitnesses (many).
7) Talk to the Special agents who detained you one day.
8) Talk to the Pentagon police who detained you the other day and deleted your digital photos from your camera.
9) Talk to the Arlington County dispatch center and listen to tapes never released to the public.
10) Talk to various professor level (non CT) about the videos released.

THEN

Talk with me.

what does your doctor say

you see CT, CT is everywhere

LCFC is a good thing for you
 
Here are my suggestions:

1) Talk to FEMA enigneers.
2) Talk to Pentagon rescuers including the officers in charge.
3) Talk to the NTSB agents in charge of the FDR.
4) Attempt to talk with the FBI.
5) Talk to Donald Rumsfeld's personal historian.
6) Talk with eyewitnesses (many).
7) Talk to the Special agents who detained you one day.
8) Talk to the Pentagon police who detained you the other day and deleted your digital photos from your camera.
9) Talk to the Arlington County dispatch center and listen to tapes never released to the public.
10) Talk to various professor level (non CT) about the videos released.

THEN

Talk with me.
So this doesn't have anything to do with increased acceptance of the Inside Job theory, then? Just a change of topic?
 
it is just a return on your tax dollars, you are welcome anytime, my brother sounds just like you, 2.01 GPA Engineer, I treat you just like I treat him.

please take to heart your true disrespect for those who died on 9/11 by passing on each false statement as they stand this very second on your own web site, just my opinion backed up by your disclaimer, a simple disclaimer, you forgot to add you do not care if it is wrong, but you listened to someone here and left out the reason you have wrong stuff, you do not care, and I am only extending to make that reflect you disrespect for those who died on 9/11. If you cared you would not do such shallow research, would you?


I am sure LCFC will not let me down and totally be in my face with lies and disrespect. You don't care anyway, so why respond on how you feel about fiction being passed as a truth movement instrument? Fraud, a movie made as a fictional farce is the bible of many truth movement people. Fraud?

Good luck fixing your site. (try removing it, just kidding, it is self debunking for humorous to most! But cheer up, those who share you PNAC love will suspend all thought processes and suck it up.)

So will LCFC be the big break for you as you appear on stage at those 75 dollar conferences selling soap?

The families themselves are fighting for the release of information. I respect them very much. It is the USG that has disrespected them by creating a void for the CT's to fill. Read about the outrage of Captain Burlington's family in regards to the USG trying to refuse him and Arlington burial. Then how the USG tried to refuse him a missing man formation. This is after he crashed into his old offices and killed former co-workers.

My research is about 50 times deeper than that which you or anybody (except for Gravy and Scott) have bothered to perform yourself.

My website errors are a reflection of my learning curve and the pace of information release. Will you start one so I can look at it?

Is this accusation of fraud something you can support in court?

I don't need a break. Normally I stay very low key and have passed on several opportunities to speak.

Why aren't you directing this energy to finding out what the USG is hiding about their incompetence?
 
5 pages in what time period?
I can view 5 pages in 10 seconds. Doesn't mean that I read each of those pages.

BTW, I get 2000+ unique hits to a fan website per day on an old 1980's cartoon series. 90% stay longer than 3 minutes.

Congratulations!
 
what does your doctor say

you see CT, CT is everywhere

LCFC is a good thing for you

The first "CT" I have ever looked into is 9/11. Part of that was because of my position as a firefighter when it happened. I was very well aware of the rumors about secondary explosives within 3 weeks of the event.

Try to stick with things you have direct knowledge about.
 
Did you say NIST or FEMA?

I'm not sure what you're suggesting.

The collapse of WTC 7 was different from that of WTC 1 and WTC 2, which showered debris in a wide radius as their frames essentially "peeled" outward.

Yup. I agree with this. (btw: The only folks who I've seen that disagree with this statement are CTers who say that all three buildings fell the exact same way. But I digress)

The collapse of WTC 7 had a small debris field

You bolded "small". Why? It's a subjective and relative term. Mercury (the planet) is small, too. It's all in the context it's used. Considering the paragraph structure, it's clear that the debris field is smaller than if the frame had peeled outward as it did in the twin towers.

as the façade was pulled downward, suggesting an internal failure and implosion.

Yup. The way the building collapsed suggests internal failure and implosion.

Am I missing something, here? Are you suggesting that the WTC7 report will say that the building toppled to the side? I'm honestly stumped at what is wrong with the quote you provided from FEMA.
 
Maybe it´s a dumb question but what are inside tips
in context to 9/11? :confused:

1) Questions that even the rescuers at the Pentagon experienced (one particular topic).

2) Anonymous photos sent to me.

3) Enforcement agencies talking about how they were handled and overridden by the FBI with significant concerns about the procees.
 

Back
Top Bottom