Verifiable, OBJECTIVE evidence of explosives

jessicarabbit said:
I have verified via the gift of video. It is objective unless you think those flashes are people in the towers taking pictures or something.
Click to expand...

Now that I think about it and have rewatched the video, I seem to recall seeing a clearer version of the vid you posted, in the clearer version the "flashes" are paper. I'll have to try and find the clearer version though.
 
Skibum said:
Now that I think about it and have rewatched the video, I seem to recall seeing a clearer version of the vid you posted, in the clearer version the "flashes" are paper. I'll have to try and find the clearer version though.
Click to expand...
No, they're flutter bombs!
 
You have any idea how tough it is to wade through the millions of ct sites and grainy blurry versions of videos to find a decent looking clip.
 
jessicarabbit said:
They made plenty of noise ask the witnesses. They were not invisible, that video just showed some.
Click to expand...

No, it didn't. Explosives used in CDs are not dropped along the outside of the buildings. Those were pieces of reflective debris, most likely window fragments. You could see them falling relative to the building behind them.
 
Only two bombs were enough to bring down a whole WTC tower?

No conventional explosive is capable of that. These must have been H bombs.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
On these pages are a wealth a photographic evidence, showing clearly that the towers were blown to kingdom come. That is, there is very little left of them.
Click to expand...
My search of scientific literature containing the phrase "kingdom come" has been fruitless. I have seen that term used in a religious context. You've been asked this before, but would you mind giving an exact definition that's relevant to the issues at hand?
Please bring your evidence that they "collpased"
Click to expand...
Ditto for "collpased."

and "fell down". I see no evidence of that.
Click to expand...
Fell down is easy. The buildings are no longer there, and they weren't dismantled. There are some videos and photos of them falling. I'm sure an internet search will turn them up for you.

While you're at it, offer explanations about the melted cars and the blown out windows.
Click to expand...
No melted cars that I'm aware of, but this issue was discussed in another thread recently. I'm pretty sure you were involved in that thread. Search for "Docker," "Judy Wood," and "beam weapons." The windows were broken by wind and debris.
 
mortimer said:
No, it didn't. Explosives used in CDs are not dropped along the outside of the buildings. Those were pieces of reflective debris, most likely window fragments. You could see them falling relative to the building behind them.
Click to expand...

Do you have expert analysis or commentary to verify that?
 
Gravy said:
My search of scientific literature containing the phrase "kingdom come" has been fruitless. I have seen that term used in a religious context. You've been asked this before, but would you mind giving an exact definition that's relevant to the issues at hand?
Ditto for "collpased."

Fell down is easy. The buildings are no longer there, and they weren't dismantled. There are some videos and photos of them falling. I'm sure an internet search will turn them up for you.

No melted cars that I'm aware of, but this issue was discussed in another thread recently. I'm pretty sure you were involved in that thread. Search for "Docker," "Judy Wood," and "beam weapons." The windows were broken by wind and debris.
Click to expand...

He has a point. I would like to see your analysis of the total collapse after initiation please gravy.
 
jessicarabbit said:
Do you have expert analysis or commentary to verify that?
Click to expand...
In your world, the world where "look at these two spots of light, they could have been nothing other than explosions" qualifies as expert analysis, I think it's safe to say that everyone has expert analysis to back up their claims. Except for the actual experts, of course.
 
jessicarabbit said:
He has a point. I would like to see your analysis of the total collapse after initiation please gravy.
Click to expand...
Millions of pounds of building fell, destroying the structure below. Glad to be of assistance.
 
jessicarabbit said:
Do you have expert analysis or commentary to verify that?
Click to expand...
A clear video will make it all moot. But CTists avoid clear video like a *vampire avoids garlic.








*disclaimer for the stupid: use of the word "vampire" is simply for the use of a literary tool known as an "analogy" and should not be construed to make it appear that I believe in vampires.
 
This thread is lame. I thought it would contain dozens of quotes by people who had planted the explosives in the three towers. But nooooo... Lame, I tell you.
 
WildCat said:
A clear video will make it all moot. But CTists avoid clear video like a *vampire avoids garlic.

Similar explosions are seen in similar positions in the north tower when the south tower is hit.








*disclaimer for the stupid: use of the word "vampire" is simply for the use of a literary tool known as an "analogy" and should not be construed to make it appear that I believe in vampires.
Click to expand...

Similar explosions are seen in similar positions in the north tower when the south tower is hit.
 
jessicarabbit said:
Could I have a slightly more scientific analysis? Maybe a few equations and a quantitative breakdown.
Click to expand...
Why don't you consult the engineering dept. of a university near you? They will be able to explain to you that buildings aren't designed to withstand the equivalent of a 20 story building falling on top of them. Hard to believe, isn't it? :rolleyes:
 
Gravy don't ever ask me to back up my statements again until you can back up your analysis of the total collapse.
 
jessicarabbit said:
Similar explosions are seen in similar positions in the north tower when the south tower is hit.
Click to expand...

Well I guess I was completely wrong. That couldn't POSSIBLY have been broken glass falling from the N tower when the S tower was hit. INCONCEIVABLE!

:rolleyes:
 
WildCat said:
Why don't you consult the engineering dept. of a university near you? They will be able to explain to you that buildings aren't designed to withstand the equivalent of a 20 story building falling on top of them. Hard to believe, isn't it? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


I was asking gravy. When I make a claim I am asked to back it up. Gravy should do the same.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom