Who Disrespects NYPD & NYFD

realitybites said:
Yes.... controlled demolition is MUCH simpler than using a paper shredder and wiping a couple hard drives.

... Are you serious with that contention Jess?
Click to expand...

Well the Mayors bunker was in there.

Come to think of it, shouldn't a building containg bunkers and secret service be stronger than an ordinary builing and less liable to total collapse?
 
Russell Pickering said:
It's not possible for 3 steel frame buildings to have non symmetrical damage and fall symmetrically straight down on the same day within 3 blocks of each other with fire as a primary cause for the first time in history.

It's mutually exclusive with physics and probability.
Click to expand...
I'm calling your bluff again, Russell. Show us your physics and your probability calculations.
 
Russell Pickering said:
The primary evidence for controlled demolition is the explosives which of course blow up.
Click to expand...


Hang on, you said they took out WTC7 to hide evidence?

Now you're saying the explosives ARE the evidence?

So they blew up WTC7 to hide the evidence that they blew it up?

Um....

Nevermind.

-Gumboot
 
jessicarabbit said:
Well the Mayors bunker was in there.

Come to think of it, shouldn't a building containg bunkers and secret service be stronger than an ordinary builing and less liable to total collapse?
Click to expand...


Not that kind of bunker. It was a command centre. Not a pillbox.

-Gumboot
 
jessicarabbit said:
Well the Mayors bunker was in there.

Come to think of it, shouldn't a building containg bunkers and secret service be stronger than an ordinary builing and less liable to total collapse?
Click to expand...
The command center was on one floor. The building was an office building, not a fortress. Jessica, I ask you again: will you read my paper on WTC 7 before continuing to speculate like this?
 
Russell Pickering said:
It's not possible for 3 steel frame buildings to have non symmetrical damage and fall symmetrically straight down on the same day within 3 blocks of each other with fire as a primary cause for the first time in history.
Click to expand...

After two of them being slammed with jet airliners for the first time in history.

And after the third was bombarded with debris from the first two for the first time in history.

Do you believe than man has walked on The Moon, Russell? After all, it had never happened before.

It's mutually exclusive with physics and probability.
Click to expand...

Demonstrate how it is not physically possible.

Calculate the odds of the Twin Towers falling after being stuck at high speed by a commercial jet airliner and having a multiple floor inferno for ~1 hour.

Time to put your cards on the table, Russ.
 
gumboot said:
Completely true. Had that happened, you'd be right. But it didn't, so you're wrong.

A monkey with a degree in banana eating could see this just from watching a few video clips.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

Set your bananna down and put a piece of paper against the edge of the building in the clip.

wtc-7-small.gif


Then take a minute to watch this.

Even one of the Ground Zero ironworkers said, "You couldn't have paid a demolition company to take 'em down straighter."

(1:10) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOSZ5nVfc8Q
 
I remember when I was younger and had just gotten my license, I accidentally backed into a pole. The damage wasn't really bad at all, just a minor ding. But I didn't want my step-dad to find out about it, so I blew up the car.
 
I just had this image of a razor-wire-covered sandbag-flanked concrete pillbox in the middle of Manhattan, complete with machine gun nests with over-lapping fields of fire.

MAYOR: We'll see if those yellow cabs get past us now! Mwahahahahaha!

-Gumboot
 
Gravy said:
The command center was on one floor. The building was an office building, not a fortress. Jessica, I ask you again: will you read my paper on WTC 7 before continuing to speculate like this?
Click to expand...

When I know your credentials. There are millions of wtc7 papers, what makes yours exceptional?
 
Russell, you asked that we discuss the details of your so-called CD?

When were the towers rigged?

How were the towers rigged?

By whom were the towers rigged?

What explosives were used?

How much people were involved?

How much time did it take?

Thanks for discussing
 
realitybites said:
I remember when I was younger and had just gotten my license, I accidentally backed into a pole. The damage wasn't really bad at all, just a minor ding. But I didn't want my step-dad to find out about it, so I blew up the car.
Click to expand...

You can mock, but lots of people do indeed burn houses down for insurance fraud or to hide something else.
 
qarnos said:
Demonstrate how it is not physically possible.

Calculate the odds of the Twin Towers falling after being stuck at high speed by a commercial jet airliner and having a multiple floor inferno for ~1 hour.

Time to put your cards on the table, Russ.
Click to expand...

My cards are and have been on the table. I can say one thing for sure - I am even more convinced of a conspiracy since coming here and looking into this.
 
Russell Pickering said:
Set your bananna down and put a piece of paper against the edge of the building in the clip.

[qimg]http://www.pentagonresearch.com/lc2/wtc-7-small.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...


While I'm doing that, go tell the owners of 30 West Broadway how fortunate it was that WTC7 fell straight down and missed them completely...



Russell Pickering said:
Even one of the Ground Zero ironworkers said, "You couldn't have paid a demolition company to take 'em down straighter."
Click to expand...


Well if a metal worker said they fell straight down, they must have. I still don't get how on earth those NYC builders managed to stick two skyscrapers in the middle of a busy city with a footprint that overlapped the surrounding blocks.

That's some crazy wacked-out Star Trek s**** that is.

-Gumboot
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom