Who Disrespects NYPD & NYFD

gumboot said:
Cool,

So you are saying you're argument is the incredibly elaborate and highly-risky action of rigging the towers for demolition was done PURELY to kill an extra 400+ emergency personnel?

I don't see how you can consider the US Government to be so incredibly clever, and yet so utterly stupid, at exactly the same time.

It just isn't possible.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...
Yes. Rig the towers with explosives to kill an extra 400 people in the towers, but rig WTC7 with explosives to clear the area and kill no one.

Ya' hear that? It's the sound of pieces falling into place.
 
Russell Pickering said:
So at least now we agree CD is logical.

I guess we only have to discuss the details now.
Click to expand...
I would personally love to hear the details on controlled demolition. I've been trying to get that out of the LC crowd, but apparently over there, specifics on how the greatest conspiracy in the ever ever went down aren't all that important.
 
Frankly, if the NWO really does exist, and things happened as the CTers claim, I'm not the least bit worried. They pose a lesser threat to mankind than me and my friends armed with Airsoft BB Guns.

-Gumboot
 
realitybites said:
Yes. Rig the towers with explosives to kill an extra 400 people in the towers, but rig WTC7 with explosives to clear the area and kill no one.

Ya' hear that? It's the sound of pieces falling into place.
Click to expand...

I think the contention is that 7s demolition was connected to destroying evidence noyt killing people.
 
jessicarabbit said:
Great oxymoron! The corrections are informing me
Click to expand...
My point was, it's annoying to have to correct you about things that are so easy to learn. I highly recommend 911myths.com as a source to answer many of the 9/11-related questions you may have. Also, the search function on this forum is useful. Sorry, but we do get tired of answering the same questions and correcting the same misconceptions over and over.
 
jessicarabbit said:
I think the contention is that 7s demolition was connected to destroying evidence noyt killing people.
Click to expand...


Destroying evidence like all that paper that was blown all over Manhattan? Like I said... the conspirators are the most retarded individuals in the history of the carbon lifeform.

-Gumboot
 
gumboot said:
It's not possible for someone to be both inhumanly clever and Forrest Gump Stupid. They are mutually exclusive.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

It's not possible for 3 steel frame buildings to have non symmetrical damage and fall symmetrically straight down on the same day within 3 blocks of each other with fire as a primary cause for the first time in history.

It's mutually exclusive with physics and probability.

"Idiot savants are a group of humans that are incapable of learning, writing or reading, yet they have unlimited access to specific, accurate knowledge in the fields of mathematics, music, and other precise areas."
 
Pardalis said:
What evidence?
Click to expand...
Whenever I want to remove information from my hard drives or destroy some files, I always set my building on fire for seven hours and then blow it up, but not so thoroughly that all the evidence is destroyed. I like to keep things exciting!
 
jessicarabbit said:
I think the contention is that 7s demolition was connected to destroying evidence noyt killing people.
Click to expand...
Yes.... controlled demolition is MUCH simpler than using a paper shredder and wiping a couple hard drives.

... Are you serious with that contention Jess?
 
Russell Pickering said:
It's not possible for 3 steel frame buildings to have non symmetrical damage and fall symmetrically straight down on the same day within 3 blocks of each other with fire as a primary cause for the first time in history.
Click to expand...


Completely true. Had that happened, you'd be right. But it didn't, so you're wrong.

A monkey with a degree in banana eating could see this just from watching a few video clips.

-Gumboot
 
Gravy said:
My point was, it's annoying to have to correct you about things that are so easy to learn. I highly recommend 911myths.com as a source to answer many of the 9/11-related questions you may have. Also, the search function on this forum is useful. Sorry, but we do get tired of answering the same questions and correcting the same misconceptions over and over.
Click to expand...

Who says you "have to" correct me? I prefer reputable sources like the washington post etc to anonymous websites like 911myths.com
 
Gravy said:
Whenever I want to remove information from my hard drives or destroy some files, I always set my building on fire for seven hours and then blow it up, but not so thoroughly that all the evidence is destroyed. I like to keep things exciting!
Click to expand...

Yeah, these evil Globalists sure like to live on the edge!
 
Gravy said:
Whenever I want to remove information from my hard drives or destroy some files, I always set my building on fire for seven hours and then blow it up, but not so thoroughly that all the evidence is destroyed. I like to keep things exciting!
Click to expand...

The primary evidence for controlled demolition is the explosives which of course blow up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom