Who Disrespects NYPD & NYFD

jessicarabbit said:
In that case, why did the antenna fall first in wtc1?

You keep saying initiated, what happened after initiation? Are we supposed to guess?
Click to expand...

how do you know the antenna fell first? How do you know there was not internal failure first?

The fires in WTC1 grew bigger and bigger the whole time after impact. How do you know the internal structure of the core did not fail first to start the initiation you want to hear about, the core column where fire was in a funace with a flue to the top floors! like a blast furnace hot burning fires rising in the core, core fails first out side follows, building fails and 1,000,000,000,000 Joules are released over the next 30 seconds of WTC1 falling all over, spreading huge chunks of WTC over 10 times its own footprint!!!!!!!!!!111


we are done, proof complete

did you see the windows blowing out due to fires???

wow
 
R.Mackey said:
Et tu, "Jessica?"

Actually, not one bit. I've explained my avatar before. That happens to be an actual picture of me, under quite humorous circumstances. I don't suppose you've ever heard the expression, "Lighten Up?"
Click to expand...

the rabbit is really a guy

wonder what is short on that

what would docker say
 
Usual Suspect said:
Isn't that a toon in yours as well?? Come on now. Critical Thinking people Critical Thinking.

Can the Critical Thinkers debunk Steele??? I don't think so.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Can you answer a simple question? Apparently not.

After that, let's see if you can argue Steele's point. If so, we can talk about it. If not, well... you're just not that interesting, are you?
 
Usual Suspect said:
Isn't that a toon in yours as well?? Come on now. Critical Thinking people Critical Thinking.

Can the Critical Thinkers debunk Steele??? I don't think so.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I wasn't the one starting to make assumptions from peoples avatars. Only pointing to the absurdness of wabbit's remark.
 
beachnut said:
how do you know the antenna fell first? How do you know there was not internal failure first?

The fires in WTC1 grew bigger and bigger the whole time after impact. How do you know the internal structure of the core did not fail first to start the initiation you want to hear about, the core column where fire was in a funace with a flue to the top floors! like a blast furnace hot burning fires rising in the core, core fails first out side follows, building fails and 1,000,000,000,000 Joules are released over the next 30 seconds of WTC1 falling all over, spreading huge chunks of WTC over 10 times its own footprint!!!!!!!!!!111


we are done, proof complete

did you see the windows blowing out due to fires???

wow
Click to expand...

Im not so sure the antenna did fall first.

As NIST states

"Photographic and videographic records were reviewed to identify structurally-related events. Where possible, all four faces of a building were examined for a given event or time period to provide complete understanding of the building response. Observations from a single vantage point can be misleading and may result in incorrect interpretation of events. For instance, photographic and videographic records taken from due north of the WTC 1 collapse appeared to indicate that the antenna was sinking into the roof (McAllister 2002). When records from east and west vantage points were viewed, it was apparent that the building section above the impact area tilted to the south as the building collapsed." (NIST 2005)

So you can check this by looking at two videos.
First a high resolution video of the north.
http://italy.indymedia.org/uploads/2005/03/wtc1-demolition-4.avi

Then compare another angle.
http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc1dem5/911.wtc.1.demolition.east.1.wmv

I think NIST is correct.
 
Last edited:
Usual Suspect said:
It's the Gravy duck Steele duck two step. I do it well thank you. I'm not ducking you. I don't owe you a reply so therefore you get none Poncho.;)
Click to expand...

Correct, you don't owe me a reply.

However, the fact that you can't is reason Number One why you are not convincing.

Perhaps you'd be more at home in the Humor section of the forum?
 
jessicarabbit said:
Wheres all the banning talk come from? Nobody here is doing anything wrong
Click to expand...

Hi again, am I on your ignore list or some thing ?

I posted this and you have not responded.

So now you have all this evidence could you guys tell us what you think happened on 911?

In a few short sentences. I will give you an example.

19 guys funded through Al Quada hijacked four planes. Three of them hit buildings. Two burnt and fell down. One hit the Pentagon. The forth crashed after the passengers staged a fight back. NIST have produced a report into the collapse of the towers that is accepted by the vast majority of the scientific community. At the moment they are investigating why WTC 7 collapsed.

OK over to you.

I'll start you off.

"Some time before 911............... (please enter sentences)...........................so 911 is an inside job"

(Ps, no nitpicking of my sentences just enter your own)

Free my mind and tell me what happened, no excuses, no fall back on “we’re just asking question”. No more “that’s for the USG to tell us”.

YOU are the accusers of US citizens of being involved in mass murder of their fellow countrymen, time to put up. Tell us what happened.

BTW what time is it in the UK ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom