Two can play at that game.
You haven't answered the most basic question about your story, blowing an irreparable hole in it, because you know YOU CAN'T!!!
Silly, huh?
Who Disrespects NYPD & NYFD
- Thread starter Usual Suspect
- Start date
You haven't answered the most basic question about your story, blowing an irreparable hole in it, because you know YOU CAN'T!!!
Silly, huh?
jessicarabbit
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
- Messages
- 555
In that case, why did the antenna fall first in wtc1?
You keep saying initiated, what happened after initiation? Are we supposed to guess?
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
Nice.
Anyway, could you humor us and trot out something in Gravy's paper that you think is a lie or inaccurate, and rationally discuss the reasons why you think so? You HAVE read it, right?
Thanks.
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
I dunno. Experts say that once it was intiated, the result was foregone. Sounds reasonable to me, but If you have a problem with it, then perhaps you could question those experts.
I'm sure they will appreciate somebody who really has no idea second-guessing them.
Usual Suspect
Unregistered
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 228
Hey Poncho.... go ahead. Debunk Steele. I dare you to even try. Don't hurt yourself though cause you can't do it. Why do you think Gravy didn't even address the links except to say "This isn't a link dump"?? Cause he knows he CAN'T debunk Steele. I'm not the first who has asked him to and yet he still can't and he's had time to do his Gravy research on it. You figure it out.
jessicarabbit
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
- Messages
- 555
Are we meant to accept foregone as a conclusion of all that studying? Why bother having investigtions? Just write -
Study Into Collapse of Building X
By So-and-So Ph.D
Collapse was a foregone conclusion
The end.
This is hilarious.
A moment ago, you were complaining about Gravy because "he was only repeating what other people said."
And now here you are, not even making an argument on your own, just throwing down a bunch of links somebody else said. You haven't even showed us that you understand them.
We're here for interesting conversation. The taunts of a hypocrite like yourself mean nothing.
yes tell us why did the antenna fall first?
what do you think happen after initiations?
what do you have?
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
No. There are millions of words published by those experts explaining, in minute detail, WHY they think what they think. The NIST report is just one of dozens of them.
Why suggest it was a rubber stamp? You have to know that isn't true.
If you have a problem with them, then show us where they are wrong.
jessicarabbit
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
- Messages
- 555
Your missing my point. You keep talking about initiation. Can you explain what happened after?
So what do you have to comment on of the many real papers that have explained what happen?
Do you have access to journal at your school? You could check one out and tell us why you think they are wrong or right.
You can even study a CT one and tell us if you agree. I think you have not read any. Or why would you question, instead of telling.
Try this one, tell us what you think and why, to help us understand the reason behind this paper explaining the WTC collapse.
http://worldtradecentertruth.com/Journal_4_Jet.pdf
What do you think about this paper? I already did a review.
SezMe
post-pre-born
Hey, even I know that one. The towers fell down. Next.
jessicarabbit
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
- Messages
- 555
No explain what happened after, not state it.
Usual Suspect
Unregistered
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 228
OOOOO that's a good one. Think of it all by yourself Poncho??? Where has Gravy gone since the posting of the links??
Go ahead since you're his friend there Poncho. You ask him to debunk Steele. He CAN NOT DO IT!!! Gotta love it.
Why not check out some of the real papers on the WTC collapse and share what you think happened.
what do you think the initiation was, since you are asking and extending, what do you think and then ask who agrees or thinks it is something else?
Does Dr Jones mention it in his paper, I assume you have read it since you seemed CT inclined?
http://worldtradecentertruth.com/vo...ollapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.doc
I think jones' paper is wrong on many issues, that is a whole thread, and his conclusions are not justified with his thin evidence... what about you
Can you explain? What is your story about the failure?
He told you he is satisfied the damage of the impact and fires caused the structual failure of the WTC, any rational human can use his head and that is a very good answer
case closed
now what do you say, or are you just a ct guy who asks questions incapable of rational thought
Glad you liked it, since it happens to be the truth.OOOOO that's a good one. Think of it all by yourself Poncho??? Where has Gravy gone since the posting of the links??
Go ahead since you're his friend there Poncho. You ask him to debunk Steele. He CAN NOT DO IT!!! Gotta love it.
Still waiting for an answer, tough guy.
It's been ten pages now.
jessicarabbit
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
- Messages
- 555
One can tell by R.Mackeys avatar he would like to be a tough guy. Wonder what shortcomings he may ne trying to hide....
stateofgrace
Unregistered
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2006
- Messages
- 3,843
Hi again jessicarabbit
Do you remember this post? Maybe you could address it please.
So now you have all this evidence could you guys tell us what you think happened on 911?
In a few short sentences. I will give you an example.
19 guys funded through Al Quada hijacked four planes. Three of them hit buildings. Two burnt and fell down. One hit the Pentagon. The forth crashed after the passengers staged a fight back. NIST have produced a report into the collapse of the towers that is accepted by the vast majority of the scientific community. At the moment they are investigating why WTC 7 collapsed.
OK over to you.
I'll start you off.
"Some time before 911............... (please enter sentences)...........................so 911 is an inside job"
(Ps, no nitpicking of my sentences just enter your own)
Free my mind and tell me what happened, no excuses, no fall back on “we’re just asking question”. No more “that’s for the USG to tell us”.
YOU are the accusers of US citizens of being involved in mass murder of their fellow countrymen, time to put up. Tell us what happened.
BTW what time is it in the UK ?
Do you remember this post? Maybe you could address it please.
So now you have all this evidence could you guys tell us what you think happened on 911?
In a few short sentences. I will give you an example.
19 guys funded through Al Quada hijacked four planes. Three of them hit buildings. Two burnt and fell down. One hit the Pentagon. The forth crashed after the passengers staged a fight back. NIST have produced a report into the collapse of the towers that is accepted by the vast majority of the scientific community. At the moment they are investigating why WTC 7 collapsed.
OK over to you.
I'll start you off.
"Some time before 911............... (please enter sentences)...........................so 911 is an inside job"
(Ps, no nitpicking of my sentences just enter your own)
Free my mind and tell me what happened, no excuses, no fall back on “we’re just asking question”. No more “that’s for the USG to tell us”.
YOU are the accusers of US citizens of being involved in mass murder of their fellow countrymen, time to put up. Tell us what happened.
BTW what time is it in the UK ?
Et tu, "Jessica?"
Actually, not one bit. I've explained my avatar before. That happens to be an actual picture of me, under quite humorous circumstances. I don't suppose you've ever heard the expression, "Lighten Up?"