To expand on this a little bit, if the air compression was enough to shatter windows a few stories down, imagine what it would be like in a small area such as a stairwell.Sounds like floors collapsing to me.
Have you seen Inside the Twin Towers? They feature Capt. Jay Jonas' story. He was trapped on the 4th floor of the North Tower after the collapse. So, I'd say it was certainly possible.Okay, so assume it is. Read the first statement again.
People on the eighth floor when the collapse began survived to make a witness statement?
I did. However, I'll make a deal with you. You tell me who made the statement and I'll see what I can find out.No I haven't watched it yet. Please summarize the part of it that is relevent to this point.
There were floors collapsing throughout the building prior to the catastrophic global collapse.People on the eighth floor when the collapse began survived to make a witness statement?
Even after the global collapse initiated, it took longer than 9 seconds. Where do you get this stuff? Have you learned nothing in your time here?Okay, so you're both saying this explosion is a result of the collapse. So these people made it from the 8th floor to ground level, and safety, in the 9 seconds it took for the tower to come down?
There were floors collapsing throughout the building prior to the catastrophic global collapse.
Please don't get all stupid on me.Okay great, this is what I wanted to hear. You're saying that floors were collapsing prior to global catastrophic failure.
So, on the one hand, the tower collapsed so quickly, because when a floor fails, all the top floors crashing down could not be resisted by the lower structure, yet when it comes to accounting for explosions, we have all sorts of floors collapsing independently of the rest of the structure?
I did, there were people on the lower floors of the tower trapped in the rubble that still survived the collapse. It's a proven fact. Ergo, they could have survived the collapse. Now, you seem to want certainty, therefore, why don't you find the name of the fireman so we can find out exactly what happened to him? Or are you only good at throwing around insults?How about I make a deal with you? You provide a satisfactory explanation and I won't think you're talking out of your ass.
Okay great, this is what I wanted to hear. You're saying that floors were collapsing prior to global catastrophic failure.
So, on the one hand, the tower collapsed so quickly, because when a floor fails, all the top floors crashing down could not be resisted by the lower structure, yet when it comes to accounting for explosions, we have all sorts of floors collapsing independently of the rest of the structure?
The same could be said of you.Ah. I see how it works now. You talk yourself into a corner than the ad hominems fly.
Dazed, I don't know what you're trying to say here.
WTC 1 and 2 collapsed. On fire. They had hundreds of small generators, diesel tanks, high voltage lines, coffee makers, air fresheners, and who knows what else. The total chemical energy stored in the WTC towers was the equivalent of a 5 kiloton bomb by one estimate.
Very complex situation.
I don't see how your anecdote about what happened to one or two people is inconsistent with the official story. Could you explain that to me, please?
Which building was that man in Dazed?Ah. I see how it works now. You talk yourself into a corner than the ad hominems fly.
The same could be said of you.
Fair enough, I'd agree with that. But much larger explosions are also not unexpected, in fact were observed by many on scene.I agree, I was just pointing out the silliness of Hawk One trying to say these explosions were caused by aerosol cans and soda.