• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Raw evidence of Chris Lying...
pantsonfire.jpg


logo_pants.jpg
 
zaayrdragon said:
Ah, so you finally clarify this chesnut.

I'm more than willing to concede this point, Chris - provided there is some actual proof involved. Your posts are not proof of anything, since you have no credibility.

But I did the research and discovered the truth. Yes, in Santa Barbara on limited cable, KCET is broadcast on Channel 10. In most of the rest of California, channel 10 is an ABC affiliate.

And I have no reason to insist on proof that you lived in Santa Barbara in 1990 - I have that much data already.

However, it is appropriate to call it KCET Channel 28, because being shown on channel 10 locally doesn't make the station channel 10.

But let's be generous - there is no reason to go overboard because you misrepresented what channel you watch PBS on.

(BTW - there is no listing for any such documentary at 8:00 PM in 1990 for KCET, period. But that's another story.)

Now - please likewise address the issue of the time-travelling Mohawk?
Click to expand...

How about you get serious about 3,000 innocent Americans murders first. Address a critical issue.

Explain why no steel core columns are seen int he core area in this original high res image.

 
Christophera, what is your calculated chance of anyone believing all your idiotic bs about a concrete core? < 0% ?
 
Garb said:
You cannot make a viable assumption based on that photo.
Click to expand...

It is called a conclusion and it is rational, logical and reasonable. The murders of our fellow Americans demand that, at least.

Are you not up to this?

And, ........ if it is not concrete, what is it.
 
Bell said:
Christophera, what is your calculated chance of anyone believing all your idiotic bs about a concrete core? < 0% ?
Click to expand...

By this time even you believe it and are in denial because you are too afraid to admit that our government has been infiltrated and you have a responsibility.

Your question is moot, there is no evidence for anyone to beleive anything else.

They would have to assume the government is truthful and correct.
 
Christophera said:
It is called a conclusion and it is rational, logical and reasonable. The murders of our fellow Americans demand that, at least.

Are you not up to this?

And, ........ if it is not concrete, what is it.
Click to expand...

You cannot make a rational conclusion based on a single picture that doesn't even show you detail of anything.

You can't tell whether it is concrete or not, and judging by the many diagrams that I have seen and the many pictures that do not show a concrete core, I can say it is most defenitely not concrete.
 
Garb said:
You cannot make a rational conclusion based on a single picture that doesn't even show you detail of anything.

You can't tell whether it is concrete or not, and judging by the many diagrams that I have seen and the many pictures that do not show a concrete core, I can say it is most defenitely not concrete.
Click to expand...

YOU cannot make a rational conclusion.

I do not need detail on the core walls. I can tell by the sihouette which does have detail on the edge that it is steel reinforced concrete and that it ABSOLUTELY is not structural steel. By default it must be concrete.


I have experience and know what I'm looking at.

Would you like it if others with experience DO NOT get the opportunity to make rational conclusions?

What about those 3000 dead Americans where due process was violated, Are you okay with that? You seem to be avoiding discussion on this, justification for your acceptence of violations of due process in capitol crimes.

Silence on the issue of your responsibility.

No images show steeel core columns but a few do show concrete, to the experienced.

 
Last edited:
YOU cannot make a rational conclusion.


I have experience and know what I'm looking at.
Click to expand...

No you don't. You have one, count it, one photo of this so claled concrete core. The only reason your argument continues is because of the lack of detail you can see. Smoke, and a dark object in it.

Would you like it if others with experience DO NOT get the opportunity to make rational conclusions?
Click to expand...

That isn't a rational conclusion. It is a guess made by a delusional human being.

What about theose 3000 dead Americans where due process was violated, Are you okay with that?
Click to expand...

Im not okay with 3000 dead Americans, but no due process was violeted.

Silence on the issue of your responsibility.
Click to expand...

Come again?
No images show steeel core columns but a few do show concrete, to the experienced.
Click to expand...

Actually they all do, have you even clicked on the links of steel columns?



 
Christophera said:
Start posting evidence from the demolition of steel core columns.
Click to expand...
The WTC was unquestionably a steel core building from the 1970'2 until 9/11. The architect, then engineers, the mob filled construction crews all the way to the clean up crews post 9/11 will all attest to the steel core building. People have shown you picture after picture of a steel core.A = A. No more evidence is needed. It is NOT debatable. The twin towers have been proven beyond any doubt whatsoever that they were steel core.

NO MORE TROLLING! NO MORE TROLLING!:dig:
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
Your question is moot, there is no evidence for anyone to beleive anything else.
Click to expand...
Once again Christophera...

Who is on your side on this? If no one on this earth has evidence to believe that the towers had anything but a concrete core, surely someone sides with you.

Where are they?
 
realitybites said:
Once again Christophera...

Who is on your side on this? If no one on this earth has evidence to believe that the towers had anything but a concrete core, surely someone sides with you.

Where are they?
Click to expand...

August Domel, Jr., Ph.D., S.E., P.E. November 2001
http://www.ncsea.com/downloads/wtcseerp.pdf

Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation, published in 1992

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3793&stc=1&d=1161917435
 

Attachments

  • oxfordarchcore.jpg
    oxfordarchcore.jpg
    55.8 KB · Views: 2
firecoins said:
The WTC was unquestionably a steel core building from the 1970'2 until 9/11. The architect, then engineers, the mob filled construction crews all the way to the clean up crews post 9/11 will all attest to the steel core building. People have shown you picture after picture of a steel core.A = A. No more evidence is needed. It is NOT debatable. The twin towers have been proven beyond any doubt whatsoever that they were steel core.

NO MORE TROLLING! NO MORE TROLLING!:dig:
Click to expand...

I've never seen an image of a steel core column. The columns of this image are defined as a "MASSIVE BOX COLUMNs" that is actually inside the core area not outside it as the image shows. Those columns are actually called, "interior box columns".
 
Garb said:
YOU cannot make a rational conclusion.
Click to expand...

Can you follow rational?

If the core had 47, 1300 foot steel columns in it they would be silhouetted in broken, bent, toppling tangles instead of a nice rounded top appearing as concrete erodes from impacts and abrasions which totally indicate a concrete core core.

Garb said:
No you don't. You have one, count it, one photo of this so claled concrete core. The only reason your argument continues is because of the lack of detail you can see. Smoke, and a dark object in it.
Click to expand...

No, I have quite a few. Count them here.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

Here is the core wall at its base. Now, ......... rationally explain WHY no steel creo columns pentrate the stairwell or none are seen to teh left of the stair or in the foreground. And, ...... what is the grey mass about 17 feet thick between the stair and the interior box column?

Garb said:
Im not okay with 3000 dead Americans, but no due process was violeted.
Click to expand...

Private investigations were blocked into the supposed structural failures and evidence was removed from the scene and taken overseas. If there were structural failures, why would private engineering investigations be blocked.

Structures that fail need to be as well understood as possible to protect people working in other similar structures. This is rational and logical. Do you have a problem with that conclusion?
 
Christophera said:
By this time even you believe it and are in denial because you are too afraid to admit that our government has been infiltrated and you have a responsibility.

Your question is moot, there is no evidence for anyone to beleive anything else.

They would have to assume the government is truthful and correct.
Click to expand...

How would you know what I believe or don't believe? Are you psychic? And why should I admit your government has been infiltrated? By whom? What is my responsibility?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom