• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Darwinism is shameful

Darwinism is shameful -it implies all those creatures that "evolved" were having dirty sex, instead of springing from dewy fields of wildflowers as cute little babies which is the way god wants it.
 
grayman said:
Just another forum argument against Darwinism to be found here.
Click to expand...

I stopped even bothering to skim that 'argument' at this post:

Q4: Is the Big Bang Theory good news or bad news for the theory of evolution?
Click to expand...

Talking about BBT and TOE as though either had something to say about the other is a sure sign of misunderstanding one or both.
 
When they catch up to current evolutionary theory, instead of going on and on about "Darwinism" (whatever that is), wake me up.
 
Dark Jaguar said:
When they catch up to current evolutionary theory, instead of going on and on about "Darwinism" (whatever that is), wake me up.
Click to expand...

This is Wyoming. Still waiting on the Pony Express rider to bring new info.
 
grayman said:
Just another forum argument against Darwinism to be found here.
Click to expand...
The OP suggests that the person who posted it doesn't know what they're talking about:
Darwin’s theory suggested that complex creatures evolve from simple ancestors that gradually adapt to a changing environment over time.
Click to expand...
Nope.

Darwin's theory says that as a result of variation within a species, some individuals are better adapted to their environment than their competitors, and that they are therefore more successful in passing on their traits to the next generation than their competitors are.
 
Beginnings, Origin of Life:

Many Science textbooks teach that the universe began with an explosion 14 billion years ago. Darwin’s theory suggests that complex creatures such as human beings developed from single-celled animals over 5 billion years. Mathematicians say that life could not become that complex that quickly –- even in 100 billion years.


~W~
Click to expand...

...
 
grayman said:
Just another forum argument against Darwinism to be found here.
Click to expand...

I whomped in a couple of posts on page 8.

I left out the observation that if they ban me, I will hate Jesus because of their poor example as witnesses for Jesus, and thus I will go to Hell, and thus they will, too, for driving me there.
 
I went & looked at that Wyoming thing.

They mostly all come from Cheyenne, except that one from up to Mills. Last time I passed through Mills (I was driving my 1988 Taurus, it wasn't new or nothing but say that old Ford run fine for me until the head-gasket blowed up out on the Shirley Rim, good thing the road was still open or this here would of been a dang sight shorter message), it was just a junk-pile trying to join up with Casper. Looks as if they have a post office and telephone line and power run in and everything now. Times do change when you ain't looking.

That feller Windy sure picked himself a good handle. I never see so many posts and so little said in 'em. (I usta know a powder monkey up near Ucross that called hisself Windy, but that was back around 1959, don't reckon he's still kicking, them goddang powder monkeys tend to sort of live short & carefree lives.)

I about half reckon I'll join that Wyoming forum, it'd feel good to ride a mile now & then with the old tribe.
 
Last edited:
Mojo said:
Darwin's theory says that as a result of variation within a species, some individuals are better adapted to their environment than their competitors, and that they are therefore more successful in passing on their traits to the next generation than their competitors are.
Click to expand...

That's one of the biggest misconceptions about evolution I encounter. People fail to realize that individuals don't evolve, populations do.

Steven
 
Darwinism is shameful?

That's funny.

Natural selection, which I assume they mean with the term Darwinism, is like gravity, it doesn't care what you think of it or call it. It will still keep on doing what it does.
 
Well, it is Wyoming, after all. Strange, since so many fossils are found there.

This post on that link is just too funny:

The person(Crick, a Brit) who discovered DNA in the 1950's, and who won the Nobel prize for that in the 1960's noted that religion should be allowed between consenting adults but not childern.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom