realitybites
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2006
- Messages
- 1,066
So you're a firm believer in what the FBI, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, says.If the FBI have no hard evidence then I have to go with what they say.
We're making progress guys!
So you're a firm believer in what the FBI, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, says.If the FBI have no hard evidence then I have to go with what they say.
It also shows squibs 20 storeys below the debris, so are you saying the floors pancaked faster than gravity?
Source?
It's time to stop loony conspiracy theories about Sept 11."
Oh right you can confidently say Osama did attack you yet you admit he hasn't had a trial? Do you often accuse innocent people of murder.
Look for any other declared CD videos out there on the internet. If you find one with charges going on random floors, come back and show us.Source?
Docker, you can use the one I linked to a few minutes ago.Look for any other declared CD videos out there on the internet. If you find one with squibs going on random floors, come back and show us.
All you need to do is look at a controlled demolition. And please tell me what the point of having explosions DURING collapse?
And about the video, I know you have seen it or at least heard of it, so I don't know why I have to link a source. It is common knowledge.
All you need to do is look at a controlled demolition. And please tell me what the point of having explosions DURING collapse?
And about the video, I know you have seen it or at least heard of it, so I don't know why I have to link a source. It is common knowledge.
Point 1) "Squibs" is not a term used in the CD industry. They're called charges. Squibs are what they use in Hollywood to simulate bullet hits. By using the term squibs you're just exposing your ignorance of the subject.
Point 2) Those "squibs" you refer to are a handfull of windows getting blown out by the increasing air pressure due to the collapse.
Point 3) If those really had been charges, then the building would have started to collapse there. Watch the video. No collapse initiates at that point.
Steve S.
You said no controlled demolition, so you would need to look at them all.
So answer my question. If the "squibs" are 20 storeys lower then the floors must be collapsing internally faster than gravity?
You said no controlled demolition, so you would need to look at them all.
Docker, tell me something. If it was a CD, what is the special property of CD that's different from a collapse that causes things to move downward at freefall speed in a vacuum? Rockets attatched to the top of the tower?
So answer my question. If the "squibs" are 20 storeys lower then the floors must be collapsing internally faster than gravity?
Cd takes out the supports in sequence so that the mass above does not have to break through floors below.
Cd takes out the supports in sequence so that the mass above does not have to break through floors below.
So answer my question. If the "squibs" are 20 storeys lower then the floors must be collapsing internally faster than gravity?
How does that make a building fall faster than gravity allows it?