• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

A nice essay

It also shows squibs 20 storeys below the debris, so are you saying the floors pancaked faster than gravity?

Point 1) "Squibs" is not a term used in the CD industry. They're called charges. Squibs are what they use in Hollywood to simulate bullet hits. By using the term squibs you're just exposing your ignorance of the subject.

Point 2) Those "squibs" you refer to are a handfull of windows getting blown out by the increasing air pressure due to the collapse.

Point 3) If those really had been charges, then the building would have started to collapse there. Watch the video. No collapse initiates at that point.

Steve S.
 

All you need to do is look at a controlled demolition. And please tell me what the point of having explosions DURING collapse?

And about the video, I know you have seen it or at least heard of it, so I don't know why I have to link a source. It is common knowledge.
 
It's time to stop loony conspiracy theories about Sept 11."

I see you will not be joining this movement!

the movement you seem to be is Charlie Sheen's vapor facts movement of 9/11 misleading junk and other fantasies only high school dropouts can follow (or equivalent people challenged mentally to think or function without nut case leaders telling them what to think, or just making up stuff as they go type, asking questions instead of producing rational research to answer the same)

too bad these guys took five years to make up such cute junk
 
Docker, go here.

Turn up your volume. You can watch the video if you want, but I'm more interested in your thoughts on how the largest controlled demolition yet sounds.
 
Oh right you can confidently say Osama did attack you yet you admit he hasn't had a trial? Do you often accuse innocent people of murder.

So you don't believe that elements of our Government perpetrated 9/11?
 
Docker, tell me something. If it was a CD, what is the special property of CD that's different from a collapse that causes things to move downward at freefall speed in a vacuum? Rockets attatched to the top of the tower?
 
All you need to do is look at a controlled demolition. And please tell me what the point of having explosions DURING collapse?

And about the video, I know you have seen it or at least heard of it, so I don't know why I have to link a source. It is common knowledge.

You said no controlled demolition, so you would need to look at them all.
 
All you need to do is look at a controlled demolition. And please tell me what the point of having explosions DURING collapse?

And about the video, I know you have seen it or at least heard of it, so I don't know why I have to link a source. It is common knowledge.


No, he doesn't want to look at real facts remember that:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ph7HzxcLEkI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUIdf4UJ3_4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yK9XLRb1u8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-AjI78H2eo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8vREo7PFz4
http://www.controlled-demolition.com/images/client/villa_panamericanas.mpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRaNwPGcQcM
http://www.controlled-demolition.com/images/client/beirut_hilton.mpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-n0YTtc_QM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXfRJPoPNxc

More can be found on the net.

Here's a failed demolition:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-OtZKzEKVk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1vzg1lAIvM


Notice how in all of these videos, its damn noisy?
 
Point 1) "Squibs" is not a term used in the CD industry. They're called charges. Squibs are what they use in Hollywood to simulate bullet hits. By using the term squibs you're just exposing your ignorance of the subject.

Point 2) Those "squibs" you refer to are a handfull of windows getting blown out by the increasing air pressure due to the collapse.

Point 3) If those really had been charges, then the building would have started to collapse there. Watch the video. No collapse initiates at that point.

Steve S.

So answer my question. If the "squibs" are 20 storeys lower then the floors must be collapsing internally faster than gravity?
 
You said no controlled demolition, so you would need to look at them all.

Wouldn't it be easier if you showed us a controlled demolition with random explosions during collapse, because we all know that no matter how many videos of CDs we put, you are always going to say "There are probably others that support me"

So answer my question. If the "squibs" are 20 storeys lower then the floors must be collapsing internally faster than gravity?

That isn't a sign of falling fater than gravity. It is a sign of increasing air pressure.

And how is it possible for something to fall faster than gravity? Were the towers built on top of a vaccum?
 
You said no controlled demolition, so you would need to look at them all.


no, you would not need to look at them all.
you can look at a handful and get a consensous on how they are done and what happens as they happen.

again you're being purposefully obtuse.
 
Docker, tell me something. If it was a CD, what is the special property of CD that's different from a collapse that causes things to move downward at freefall speed in a vacuum? Rockets attatched to the top of the tower?

Cd takes out the supports in sequence so that the mass above does not have to break through floors below.
 
So answer my question. If the "squibs" are 20 storeys lower then the floors must be collapsing internally faster than gravity?

docker remove myquote from your sig.
YOU Do not have my permission TO EVER use anything i say as your sig fodder.
 
Cd takes out the supports in sequence so that the mass above does not have to break through floors below.

How does that make a building fall faster than gravity allows it?
 
So answer my question. If the "squibs" are 20 storeys lower then the floors must be collapsing internally faster than gravity?

The "squibs" and the acceleration are not connected, especially to the extent you're trying to connect them.
 

Back
Top Bottom