• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Anomolies at ground zero

Docker said:
By fall I mean came down due to fire etc rather than blasts.
Click to expand...

So in your mindset there is absolutely no other explanation for the collapse of WTC 7 than "blasts"? None whatsoever?

So why should NIST bother investigating it all for you?
 
Docker said:
The people that say I never cite sources are liars. I do if I can and if I can't I make clear it's an opinion.
Click to expand...
Then 28 miutes later, this was a post of yours, quoted here in it's entirety.

Docker said:
Incidentally, OKC was not a single truck bomb.
Click to expand...

In those 8 words, can you point out either your source, or where you "make clear it's an opinion"

edit to add - 10 minutes later:
Docker said:
Unexploded devices were removed.
Click to expand...
4 words, where is your source or where you "make clear it's an opinion"
 
Last edited:
Docker said:
I never claimed it did. That is one hypothesis NIST is considering. So until they reach conclusions we cant claim to know what happened.
Click to expand...

OK, agreed. So we should let this topic rest until the NIST shows its conclusions. Will you agree to not be accusing anyone of complicity in its demolition until we have NIST's report?

Do I have your word, Docker?
 
Docker said:
I never claimed it did. That is one hypothesis NIST is considering. So until they reach conclusions we cant claim to know what happened.
Click to expand...
i think the only reason they are considering it is so CTers will shut up

but regardless, if they find it collapsed due to the damage it sustained and the uncrontrolled fires, will you accept that conclusion or will you claim they "fudged the data?"
 
Docker said:
You claim that building 7 fell. It is still under investigation so you cannoy claim this. You have also endorsed claims that Rodriguez testimony has changed. Totally unsubstantiated.
Click to expand...
I'll give you a final chance to prove that you're not a liar. I asked you for evidence to back these claims. Produce it.
 
Pardalis said:
OK, agreed. So we should let this topic rest until the NIST shows its conclusions. Will you agree to not be accusing anyone of complicity in its demolition until we have NIST's report?

Do I have your word, Docker?
Click to expand...

Yes , but tell that to gravy who is writing papers saying it collapsed from fire and damage.
 
Docker said:
I don't believe it was. Damage was too extensive. Unexploded devices were removed.
Click to expand...
:dl:

Present your evidence, chief. Go right ahead. Think we're not informed?

Docker, do you know what the "unexploded devices" were?

Do you? I'll start another thread so you can elaborate on this claim.
 
when do Air Force Generals, active or retired, investigate terror attacks the occur domestically? espically when truck bombs are used?
 
Docker said:
You wrote a paper on 7 saying it collapsed due to fire and debris damage.
Click to expand...
You're not even trying to address the other claim? Last chance before proving that you're a liar, once again. Go right ahead, Docker.
 
omission is bliss!

Docker said:
By fall I mean came down due to fire etc rather than blasts.
Click to expand...

gee, Maybe you should run for some political office! You really know how to "GeNeralIze"!

Docker, its about details, details, detailz... those pesky details, especially in the use of language!!! leave out a word... and POOF! you look very ignorant!!

lh
 
Docker said:
Yes , but tell that to gravy who is writing papers saying it collapsed from fire and damage.
Click to expand...

What is wrong with him putting forth his analysis based upon the available evidence? If you do some cursory searching of the forums, you will see that Gravy is quite willing, and speedy, in correcting errors of fact. I have no doubt that if the NIST report on WTC 7 contains information in addition to what he has, or the come to a credible different conclusion that he will adjust his paper accordingly.
 
firecoins said:
when do Air Force Generals, active or retired, investigate terror attacks the occur domestically? espically when truck bombs are used?
Click to expand...

Air Force Generals that are explosives experts. There are also numerous news clips showing bomb squad removing bombs. You really do believe anything the government tells you.

Reality check: Governments do bad things
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom