• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

william rodriguez

We aren't talking about the south tower here


That's true. AA11 had an even GREATER fuel capacity because it was a 767-223ER, rather than a 767-222.

The ER models of the 200 and 300 series have a 74,000kg fuel capacity, rather than the 51,000kg capacity of the regular models.

-Gumboot
 
If you have done the research you claim then you have also seen these accounts. If not then i'm not going to do your homework for you.
I've read over 14,000 pages of first-person accounts, and seen many videos. I have not seen the accounts you speak of, either for the towers or for WTC 7.

Either present them or admit you cannot.
 
Yes, I've been linking to it since the first page. :rolleyes:

It's okay, gumboot, you've been out of the action for a while!

Plus the quotes I included a few posts back, plus my conversation with William Rodriguez.


Oops. Heh. :o Many of the quotes are familiar and many are new. Also, I notice there's a few I had come across that aren't in your compilation, but would make excellent additions (accounts specific to destroyed elevators on multiple floors). If I can manage to dig up the post I'll link you to it.

-Gumboot
 
Just saying I dont have to see your garbled nonsense if I dont have to. Incidentally, is that why you're called garb?

Are you threatening to ignore me? Well then, why don't you show me my "garbled nonsense"
 
You missed the whole poverty00 episode, didn't you? :D

You might have something there. He was so at a loss, for a three day suspension, he broke that, only to get banned. Vowed to come back! Not saying it is... just thinking of questions! Things that make you go Hmmmm.....
 
Are you threatening to ignore me? Well then, why don't you show me my "garbled nonsense"

Im threatening nothing. You implied that I am OBLIGED to look at your posts. I just pointed out that I am not.
 
Im threatening nothing. You implied that I am OBLIGED to look at your posts. I just pointed out that I am not.

Actually no I didn't. I implied that you shouldn't whine every time I say something.
 
You might have something there. He was so at a loss, for a three day suspension, he broke that, only to get banned. Vowed to come back! Not saying it is... just thinking of questions! Things that make you go Hmmmm.....

I have already been accused of being killtown, are you already accusing me of being someone else?

You see a lot of shadows don't you Dog Town.
 
Actually no I didn't. I implied that you shouldn't whine every time I say something.

Whine is not the word I would use. Hand you your posterier in a bag would be a far more appropriate set of words.
 
So now I'm pdoherty lol

Actually he is in other forums telling a very different story about this place.
 
Whine is not the word I would use. Hand you your posterier in a bag would be a far more appropriate set of words.

No. Whine is the correct term.

Have you seen Austin Powers? Are you Gravy's mini-me?

That is an attack because for some reason discussing something seems to strike a nerve with you. Seriously, do you hate it when people come into discussions or make an observation based on your statements?
 
So now I'm pdoherty lol

Actually he is in other forums telling a very different story about this place.

Of course he would. He couldn't show up at LC and tell he got banned because he tried to circumnavigate the JREF rules, would he? No, he talks about how he beated Gravy's ass (lol), and therefor Gravy got him banned. Luckely some other LC members pointed out his misconceptions.
 

Back
Top Bottom