Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[Christophera]

Unless it's a steel columns. Oh, no. Chris "knows" that those never existed. All those columns were just for show, and the concrete had no structural usefulness whatsoever because it was poured after the rest of the building.

Your words are empty with images. Show us columns inside the core.

 

[Oliver]

Nahh I prefer to us the people in these pictures for scale.

[qimg]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v229/azazal/Misc/WTC2working.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v229/azazal/Misc/WTC1working.jpg[/qimg]

But you go ahead and just keep on ignoring them

You´re wrong - no matter what you say.

 

[Christophera]

Your observations are disillusional to say the least. We have shown you a dozen of photo's with steel core columns, more steel core columns and hella lot steel core columns.

Actually you may have shown 2 images that might be interpreted as showing "core columsns" by people who don't know better.

I ususally show an image that should show steel core columns in the core but does not. It does show what can only be concrete.

 

[Oliver]

Actually you may have shown 2 images that might be interpreted as showing "core columsns" by people who don't know better.

I ususally show an image that should show steel core columns in the core but does not. It does show what can only be concrete.

It was a Jellyfish-Core. Here´s my evidence:

 

[Bell]

Actually you may have shown 2 images that might be interpreted as showing "core columsns" by people who don't know better.

I ususally show an image that should show steel core columns in the core but does not. It does show what can only be concrete.

Yes, you have posted that image about 122 times by now (give or take 23). Now, are you going to stop this performance art or what?

 

[Oliver]

Yes, you have posted that image about 122 times by now (give or take 23). Now, are you going to stop this performance art or what?

Is posting a picture 122 times spamming in terms of board rules?

 

[Christophera]

it's been a long old haul but here goes..............
chris claims to have interviewed a mohawk ironworker who helped construct the towers (who btw seems to have been working there at least 3 years before constuction of the towers began). anyway, according to our chris, this windwalking fellow was very reticent about the whole deal. becoming terrified when chris even hinted at a concrete core. it seems the steel workers were sent packing for extended periods while special NYPA operatives painted a special coating onto the rebar supposedly used in the "concrete core". these mohawks apparently fear for their lives if they blab about anything to do with the "core". but strangely this same terrified individual must have told him that mohawks sabotaged the work of the secret rebar police. this is chris' explanation of why some of the rebar didn't detonate during the collapse.

Well, it seems you've gotten the bad habit of distortion from the deniers of this thread. The steel worker was not terrified, he just seemed hesitant to continue with remembering. Now engineers are terrified of stating what they see inthe images which show the core.

And I've never said the PA applied the C4 coating, flat our error. The rebar was delivered with the coating on it.

The notion that the Indigenous steel workers sabotaged the explosive circuits is entirely mine, but it its logical.

Form te errors evidenced here in examining your efforts to make a simple communication, it can be easily seen that you might not hve the integrity to discuss evidence reasonably.

 

[Gravy]

Actually you may have shown 2 images that might be interpreted as showing "core columsns" by people who don't know better.

I ususally show an image that should show steel core columns in the core but does not. It does show what can only be concrete.

As I've explained to Chris many times, his image "southcorestands" shows part of the north tower's core. Every single time I've quizzed him on which tower was pictured in a photo I've presented he's gotten it wrong.

After years of "research," he doesn't even know which tower was where on the site. It doesn't get much worse than that.

In the photo above, note the 16-inch wide tongue-in-grove gypsum panels that comprised the core walls. Chris cannot explain how the gypsum survived while a 17-foot thick concrete wall was blown to smithereens around it.
​

​

 

[Christophera]

Is posting a picture 122 times spamming in terms of board rules?

No. as long as it is providing proof that quashes unreasonable denial of facts. Unreasonably denying facts is considered spamming in the most rational circles .

To be reasonable you must post evidence with reason.

 

[Oliver]

Well, it seems you've gotten the bad habit of distortion from the deniers of this thread. The steel worker was not terrified, he just seemed hesitant to continue with remembering. Now engineers are terrified of stating what they see inthe images which show the core.

And I've never said the PA applied the C4 coating, flat our error. The rebar was delivered with the coating on it.

The notion that the Indigenous steel workers sabotaged the explosive circuits is entirely mine, but it its logical.

Form te errors evidenced here in examining your efforts to make a simple communication, it can be easily seen that you might not hve the integrity to discuss evidence reasonably.

You´re wrong. It was a jellyfish core. Look

 

[Bell]

Is posting a picture 122 times spamming in terms of board rules?

22 times, 122 times, I don't know how often, and I don't care. We all have seen those pictures before. All I care for is for Bleeding Virgin to stop this performance art. Or see a doctor, the blood in his eyes is blocking a clear view.

 

[Oliver]

No. as long as it is providing proof that quashes unreasonable denial of facts. Unreasonably denying facts is considered spamming in the most rational circles .

To be reasonable you must post evidence with reason.

You want evidence? Here it is:

You are wrong.

 

[Oliver]

22 times, 122 times, I don't know how often, and I don't care. We all have seen those pictures before. All I care for is for Bleeding Virgin to stop this performance art. Or see a doctor, the blood in his eyes is blocking a clear view.

What are the admins in here doing? Don´t they know his stupid thread?

 

[Christophera]

After years of "research," he doesn't even know which tower was where on the site. It doesn't get much worse than that.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/8790453c68cab4cea.jpg[/qimg]

​

We cannot tell from your image where that stairwell is. I think is is inside the core and not by the core wall. The vertical steel is not the same dimensions as the interior box columns outside the core.

Most importantly is that at elevations above ground where we can easily find the core area, not steel columns are present.​

 

[Oliver]

We cannot tell from your image where that stairwell is. I think is is inside the core and not by the core wall. The vertical steel is not the same dimensions as the interior box columns outside the core.

Most importantly is that at elevations above ground where we can easily find the core area, not steel columns are present.

You´re wrong because it was Jellyfish that brought the buildings down.
Here, take a look for your own:

 

[Bell]

As I've explained to Chris many times, his image "southcorestands" shows part of the north tower's core. Every single time I've quizzed him on which tower was pictured in a photo I've presented he's gotten it wrong.

After years of "research," he doesn't even know which tower was where on the site. It doesn't get much worse than that.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/8790453c68cab4cea.jpg[/qimg]

In the photo above, note the 16-inch wide tongue-in-grove gypsum panels that comprised the core walls. Chris cannot explain how the gypsum survived while a 17-foot thick concrete wall was blown to smithereens around it.
​

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/8790452c0ed9a19b0.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/8790452c0ed9d1efb.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/8790452c0ed979936.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/8790452c0ef8e8610.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/8790452c11e07a3ea.jpg[/qimg]
​

F-ing hell, Gravy! Never seen that one before, the first picture is very unsettling...
Imagine if you where just on one of those stairs (like the firefighters and the lady) and to have survived the collapse. This picture gives me more insight on what happened to that core. F-ing hell...

 

[Oliver]

F-ing hell, Gravy! Never seen that one before, the first picture is very unsettling...

Not for Christophera. In his case it´s a funny concrete-core picture.

 

[beachnut]

Well, it seems you've gotten the bad habit of distortion from the deniers of this thread. The steel worker was not terrified, he just seemed hesitant to continue with remembering. Now engineers are terrified of stating what they see inthe images which show the core.

And I've never said the PA applied the C4 coating, flat our error. The rebar was delivered with the coating on it.

The notion that the Indigenous steel workers sabotaged the explosive circuits is entirely mine, but it its logical.

Form te errors evidenced here in examining your efforts to make a simple communication, it can be easily seen that you might not hve the integrity to discuss evidence reasonably.

you do know there was not concrete core in the WTC?

it was just steel and wallboard, 2 pieces of 3/4 inch wall board

this is why the guys trapped in an elevator were able to cut and dig through the wall board into a bathroom,

no concrete, just wall board! you need to study better or were you just point out how the CT web site is full of dolts who can not research or are just telling lies for fun?

If you think the web site is correct, then why worry about research, it will just make your fantasy vaporize.

the floors were poured of light weight concrete

the core was steel with fire coating, the fire coating consisted of 2 layers of 3/4 inch gypsum board, no concrete, there may of been concrete in the lower levels, some places had just blown on fire protection

wall board walls to protect steel from fire and concrete floors,

why do you think the core was concrete and steel? you can find references to tell you about the wall board, plus you could look up the guys stuck in the elevator who broke through the layers of wall board between the steel column in the steel core of the WTC and ended up in a bathroom then beat feet out before the WTC fell, if the core was concrete they would have been stuck for days and the WTC may have survived.

 

[Oliver]

you do know there was not concrete core in the WTC?

it was just steel and wallboard, 2 pieces of 3/4 inch wall board

this is why the guys trapped in an elevator were able to cut and dig through the wall board into a bathroom,

no concrete, just wall board! you need to study better or were you just point out how the CT web site is full of dolts who can not research or are just telling lies for fun?

If you think the web site is correct, then why worry about research, it will just make your fantasy vaporize.

the floors were poured of light weight concrete

the core was steel with fire coating, the fire coating consisted of 2 layers of 3/4 inch gypsum board, no concrete, there may of been concrete in the lower levels, some places had just blown on fire protection

wall board walls to protect steel from fire and concrete floors,

why do you think the core was concrete and steel? you can find references to tell you about the wall board, plus you could look up the guys stuck in the elevator who broke through the layers of wall board between the steel column in the steel core of the WTC and ended up in a bathroom then beat feet out before the WTC fell, if the core was concrete they would have been stuck for days and the WTC may have survived.

You´re wrong. It was a jellyfish core.

 

[Oliver]

Someone who sees a chocolate-core or a bambus-core?