• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Video of wtc 7

First flaw: Limited fires.


Way to not talk about the extensive damages on the south side. :rolleyes:
 
Hmmm, a building's about to "blow up" and it will be "coming down soon". Hmmm. How did they know that?

Great find! Let's see how the JREFers spin this one. :D
 
pdoherty76 said:
In this video you see several emergency workers warning people that building 7 is about to "BLOW UP". yes thats right, they say blow up, not collapse

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4556787288866368337
Click to expand...

So you're saying that the emergency workers were in on a plot to kill thousands and they were shouting about it in the street? Presumably they were demolition technicians disguised as rescue workers, but they hadn't yet been briefed on what 'undercover' really means.

Or are you saying they were wrong?
 
I love the comparisons of WTC 7 and standard demos. Funny how there were no squibs or explosions to be seen before collapse.

Precisely in its own footprint?
 
Killtown said:
Hmmm, a building's about to "blow up" and it will be "coming down soon". Hmmm. How did they know that?

Great find! Let's see how the JREFers spin this one. :D
Click to expand...

they will come up with a ridiculous debunk

so we now have the pull it quote and several emergency workers saying blow up, and they call us mad for thinking it was demolished
 
So basically you're accusing the emergency workers of being complicit in the controlled demolition?

Or maybe they just said "blow up" for lack of a better expression, you know, kind of like a spear of the moment expression?

ETA: Damn, Shrinker was faster!:D
 
pdoherty76 said:
In this video you see several emergency workers warning people that building 7 is about to "BLOW UP". yes thats right, they say blow up, not collapse

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4556787288866368337
Click to expand...

This one again?

How do you know they were referring to building 7?

How do you know they weren't using a colloquialism?

How do you know when the video was taken?

You are aware that there was a major bomb scare, and a report of a major gas leak, both that afternoon, both of which caused the evacuation of the area north of WTC 7, right?

Right?
 
Garb said:
I love the comparisons of WTC 7 and standard demos. Funny how there were no squibs or explosions to be seen before collapse.

Precisely in its own footprint?
Click to expand...

notice in the video that fema admits they dont know why builing 7 collapsed

so do u know more than them?
 
pdoherty76 said:
they will come up with a ridiculous debunk

so we now have the pull it quote and several emergency workers saying blow up, and they call us mad for thinking it was demolished
Click to expand...

Pull it meant pulling the firefighters out of there.


Pull it does NOT mean blowing up a building. How many times does this have to be bashed in your head for you to understand?
 
Gravy said:
This one again?

How do you know they were referring to building 7?

How do you know they weren't using a colloquialism?

How do you know when the video was taken?

You are aware that there was a major bomb scare, and a report of a major gas leak, both that afternoon, both of which caused the evacuation of that area, right?

Right?
Click to expand...


gravy u r insane

if i presented u with 70 sworn confessions of demolition guys saying they blew building 7 u would refute it

u r a lost cause
 
Gravy said:
This one again?

How do you know they were referring to building 7?

How do you know they weren't using a colloquialism?

How do you know when the video was taken?

You are aware that there was a major bomb scare, and a report of a major gas leak, both that afternoon, both of which caused the evacuation of that area, right?

Right?
Click to expand...


Jeez...you're no fun
 
pdoherty76 said:
notice in the video that fema admits they dont know why builing 7 collapsed
Click to expand...

That's because unlike you CTist idiots, they don't claim to know everything and won't advance any theory before a proper investigation is done.

Get it?
 
Garb said:
Pull it meant pulling the firefighters out of there.


Pull it does NOT mean blowing up a building. How many times does this have to be bashed in your head for you to understand?
Click to expand...

really?

so when jeff from pumpitout called controlled demolition inc and asked what pull it meant, why was he told it meant demolishing a building?
 
Killtown said:
Hmmm, a building's about to "blow up" and it will be "coming down soon". Hmmm. How did they know that?

Great find! Let's see how the JREFers spin this one. :D
Click to expand...
So, the workers are so clueless so clueless as to not be able to tell that a building gutted by debris from the WTC and ravaged by fires is at risk of collapsing, but are intelligent enough to figure out the super secret plot to demolish the building? Or are you claiming that not only were these workers complicit in the conspiracy but also were careless enough to confess this to everyone in the area with a video camera?
 
So the fire- and policemen are in on the plot and blew up the building. That sounds unbelievable. oh wait it is unbelievable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom