• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

of WTC7 and things being pulled

defaultdotxbe said:
since WTC damaged surrounding structures it was cleaerly not an implosion, and clearly not pulled away from the structures it damaged
Click to expand...
Didn't you see the East Pent fall first in the internals of the buidling, then the West Pent followed by the building kinking almost in the middle causing it to fall practically straight down the free-fall speed? If that's not a classic implosion, I don't know what is.

Say, those demo companies sure are wasting a lot of time and money. They should just set buildings on fire next time.
 
Killtown said:
Didn't you see the East Pent fall first in the internals of the buidling, then the West Pent followed by the building kinking almost in the middle causing it to fall practically straight down the free-fall speed? If that's not a classic implosion, I don't know what is.

Say, those demo companies sure are wasting a lot of time and money. They should just set buildings on fire next time.
Click to expand...

yeah but the passenger jet is more expensive than explosives...and what with the price of oil.....
 
Killtown said:
1) That's right, a building at TALL and as CLOSE to other skyscrapers has NEVER been demo'd by explosives. So by 9/11 being the first time that's happened, I thought they did a pretty good job considering it was pulled by a bunch of murdererous scum who I doubt care if it scrapped the neighboring buildings on it's way down.
Click to expand...

So the FDNY is lying? Present your case.

And who are these murderous scum you're referring to? Your evidence that there was any wrongdoing concerning WTC 7? Present it now or retract your claim.
 
Gravy said:
So the FDNY is lying? Present your case.

And who are these murderous scum you're referring to? Your evidence that there was any wrongdoing concerning WTC 7? Present it now or retract your claim.
Click to expand...
Go back and answer all the questions I've asked you in this thread that you've avoided or side-stepped first.
 
Killtown said:
Didn't you see the East Pent fall first in the internals of the buidling, then the West Pent followed by the building kinking almost in the middle causing it to fall practically straight down the free-fall speed? If that's not a classic implosion, I don't know what is.

Say, those demo companies sure are wasting a lot of time and money. They should just set buildings on fire next time.
Click to expand...

If it had imploded, it wouldn't have damaged the oter structures.

Plus it didn't fall straight down.

Plus it didn't fall at freefall.

Plus I think the penthouses falling is irrelevant when it comes to whether it was a demolition or not. Where were the explosives?
 
uk_dave said:
Ohhh even better....just collapse a big old **** off tower next to your intended demolition project.

The price just keeps on going up!

:eek:
Click to expand...
Dave, I take it you're not from the U.S. We have some powerful lobbying interests here, two being the National Federation of Arsonists and the Amalgamated Iron Hurlers' Union. They have succeeded in getting legislation passed that requires any building to be demolished to first have tons of structural steel thrown at it, and then to be set on fire for a minimum of six hours. There wasn't a great deal of opposition to the legislation, because, hey, the buildings are coming down anyway. WTC 7 is merely proof of how involved these interests are with organized crime.
 
Gravy said:
Show me.
Click to expand...
I'll re-ask them for you:

1) How is Val a "9/11 victim"?

2) which of your 26 first responders who mentioned the word "pull" used the phrase "pull it"?

3) Silverstein spokesperson said this:

"The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires."

My recollection has it that fire fighting efforts never took place in the WTC 7 and FDNY ordered FF's away at around 11:30am. "Afternoon" technically starts at after 12pm or "after noon".

It seems like Dara's statement contradicts the news reports. Maybe you can clarify it?
 
Originally Posted by Killtown
Who said he called to "discuss"? Why couldn't he have just called to
INFORM?
Click to expand...

Originally Posted by sleahead
Inform him of what? If he's a perp he knows it all already, probably for months. You CTs have them discussing, Silverstein tells him to "pull it" (CTspeak for blow it up) and then the F.C. goes off and does exactly what he's told. So, inform him of what exactly?
Click to expand...

sleahead said:
No answer, Killtown?
Click to expand...


Still waiting for an answer on this one , Killtown.
 
sleahead said:
Still waiting for an answer on this one , Killtown.
Click to expand...
Inform him that they are going to pull his building to keep him up to date, duh.


""pull it" (CTspeak for blow it up)"

No, CT speak for demo a building. We don't care how it's demo'd.
 
Killtown said:
Inform him that they are going to pull his building to keep him up to date, duh.
Click to expand...

If Silverstein is a perp, he knows exactly what will happen on September 11th, including what will happen to WTC7. He does not need anyone to ring him up and tell him anything. He can switch on his TV or listen to the radio and hear it all unfold. Are you seriously suggesting the F.C rang to say "we're blowing up your building now, Mr Silverstein".
 
Last edited:
sleahead said:
If Silverstein is a perp, he knows exactly what will happen on September 11th, including what will happen to WTC7. He does not need anyone to ring him up and tell him anything. He can switch on his TV or listen to the radio and hear it all unfold. Are you seriously suggesting the F.C rang to say "we're blowing up your building now, Mr Silverstein".
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom