LC Forum Officially offline

[JamesB]

It seems like everything has been wiped clean. I had private messages waiting to be read when the boards went down and now there is nada.

Oh well, the whole loose change thing has shot its wad, to use the crude vernacular, and I doubt I'll bother posting there any more. Plus, the black screen with white lettering is annoying and hard on the eyes.

To "shoot your wad" is a term from muzzle loaders, when you loaded the wadding into the barrel while neglecting to add the bullet, thus making the firing ineffective.

What did you think it meant?

 

[money]

To "shoot your wad" is a term from muzzle loaders, when you loaded the wadding into the barrel while neglecting to add the bullet, thus making the firing ineffective.

What did you think it meant?

umm.... (nsfw)

 

[DarkMagician]

Wow, that Dylan sure is one modest chap.

Fair and balanced!

They keep on using the wrong words. Has anyone proofread that introduction?

 

[rjh01]

LC down for more than 2 days. They said it would be down for 1 - 2 days. They forgot to remember that where computers are involved everything is more difficult and takes longer than what you thought it would.

Either that or it is a government conspiracy with loose change one of the parties involved in the conspiracy.

The new board now has over 150 members. The members list only shows the first three pages of members.

And no-one in this thread trying to defend LC?!

This is my first post in this sub forum.

 

[LashL]

To "shoot your wad" is a term from muzzle loaders, when you loaded the wadding into the barrel while neglecting to add the bullet, thus making the firing ineffective.

What did you think it meant?

Given your use of the "jaw dropping" smiley, I'm quite sure that you know exactly what "crude vernacular" I was referring to

But just to make it abundantly clear to anyone who might not, let's just say that it's closely related to getting a raging clue and the "clue goo" that follows.

 

[Pardalis]

Given your use of the "jaw dropping" smiley, I'm quite sure that you know exactly what "crude vernacular" I was referring to

Let's just say he wasn't clueless.

 

[LashL]

Let's just say he wasn't clueless.

 

[eeyore1954]

Rules at the new Loose Change thread

The Loose Change Forums are a place for intelligent, respectful exchange of ideas, regardless of opinion.

If you cannot comprehend that sentence, then this is not the place for you

i wonder if that means it is ok to disagree whether it was a missile or remote controlled 757 or if it is OK to argue it was in fact a terrorist attack.

 

[rearnakedchoke]

Rules at the new Loose Change thread



i wonder if that means it is ok to disagree whether it was a missile or remote controlled 757 or if it is OK to argue it was in fact a terrorist attack.

was their a stand down?

and who is the mastermind behind 9/11?

 

[60hzxtl]

was their a stand down?

and who is the mastermind behind 9/11?

1.) No.

2.) Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Have a nice day.

 

[Popeholden]

Rules at the new Loose Change thread



i wonder if that means it is ok to disagree whether it was a missile or remote controlled 757 or if it is OK to argue it was in fact a terrorist attack.

of COURSE that's not what it means

i recently said that yes, we really did land on the moon

i expect to be banned soon

 

[rearnakedchoke]

1.) No.

2.) Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Have a nice day.

KSH in prison since 2003? somebody wanna tell the troops that? seems they must have missed the memo, its been 3 years since we officially "arrested the mastermind"...if the perp has allready been caught, why stay and fight for 3 years?

Question: How was a plane which was known to be hostile able to have an unimpeded 48 minute joyride around US airspace before slamming into the heart of the US military?

Answer: Stand down.​

 

[60hzxtl]

KSH in prison since 2003? somebody wanna tell the troops that? seems they must have missed the memo, its been 3 years since we officially "arrested the mastermind"...if the perp has allready been caught, why stay and fight for 3 years?

Question: How was a plane which was known to be hostile able to have an unimpeded 48 minute joyride around US airspace before slamming into the heart of the US military?

Answer: Stand down.​

1.) War on an ideology is not checkers. In Chess, you take care of the pawns, keep the queen busy, and box in the king. Want a historical precedent? Piracy - there were state sponsored privateers, and individual pirates. Piracy has never been eliminated, but it is no longer the problem it was in the days of the Barberry pirates.

2.) Known to be hostile? Beyond a reasonable doubt? Innocent airliner full of Japanese tourists bound for Vegas with the transponder innocently turned off? Or, lethal hijacked plane with deadly intent. Think the fighter planes were within visual recognition? Shadowing every airliner in the sky? Able to accelerate within a 3 dimensional box to catch everything in the sky, and still have a place to refuel and a divert field for themselves?

Put the remote down and stop watching daytime TV.

 

[stateofgrace]

Question: How was a plane which was known to be hostile able to have an unimpeded 48 minute joyride around US airspace before slamming into the heart of the US military?​

Answer: Stand down.​

So how did they shoot down flight 93?

 

[rearnakedchoke]

So how did they shoot down flight 93?

i think the real question is, why?

 

[Hellbound]

i think the real question is, why?

Actually, the REAL question is, if?

Until that's answered, why is meaningless speculation and slander.

And so far, the "if they did" questin has been answered with a resounding "no".

 

[W6102LA]

i think the real question is, why?

Some info in this thread...

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=61752

 

[rearnakedchoke]

Actually, the REAL question is, if?

Until that's answered, why is meaningless speculation and slander.

And so far, the "if they did" questin has been answered with a resounding "no".

angle of crash, angle of crater, angle of burned ground, witness reports, inconsistant debris field, witnesses reports being ommited and ignored by the media, inconsistancies within 9/11 report, make me tend to belive we have not been told EXACTLY what happened, to flght93.

 

[stateofgrace]

angle of crash, angle of crater, angle of burned ground, witness reports, inconsistant debris field, witnesses reports being ommited and ignored by the media, inconsistancies within 9/11 report, make me tend to belive we have not been told EXACTLY what happened, to flght93.

Then why not admit they shot down flight 93 straight away? Why this elaborate cover up?

 

[Hellbound]

angle of crash,

What, specifically, is inconsistent about the angle of the crash? What should it have been?

angle of crater,

Again waht, specifically, is wrong with the angle of the crater? What should it have been?

angle of burned ground

Problem is? What should that "angle" have been?

witness reports

The vast majority of which are consistent with the official story as stated, and the ones that contradict are not backed by physical evidence and most likely the result of mis-interpretation. Have any that don't follow this profile? What should have been expected for witness reports?

inconsistant debris field

Again, specifics? What should it have looked like?

witnesses reports being ommited and ignored by the media

You mean all those that were not backed up by any other evidence at all? What's the problem?

inconsistancies within 9/11 report

Such as?

make me tend to belive we have not been told EXACTLY what happened, to flght93.

Well, we won't ever know exactly, but we have more than enough to be sure far beyond reasonable doubt.