• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Moving On is coming.

Russell Pickering said:
Even now they have 82 unreleased videos from the Pentagon and all of the physical wreckage of Flight 77 in their possession as well as five unidentified bodies. They are in a position to demolish the no plane theory there and prove who the hijackers were but despite many requests and the benefit it could bring to the families and victims they REFUSE to.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/evidence.html
Russell
Click to expand...

Bolding mine.

I would like to walk through the FOIA process as well as the declaration of Jacqueline Maguire to illustrate how the government acted properly in this manner. The bolded part of the above quote implies that the government is hiding 82 relevant videos. This is simply untrue.

I am going to hold off for the time being for two reasons.

1. Its been a long day, I don't know if I'm up to wading through this at the moment.

2. More importantly, I suspect that Russell is in rebuttal overload at the moment. There are oodles of us and only one of him. I believe that these discussions could be much more productive if they were much narrower in scope and discussed in more detail. I'm guesing there are about 30 unresolved talking points in this thread at this time.

Russell, let me know if/when you are ready to discuss.
 
Gravy said:
This wasn't directed to me, but I'd like to see a single piece of solid evidence of ANY kind.

Do you have ANY evidence that anyone in the U.S. government, or connected to it, was responsible for LIHOP or for planning or executing the 9/11 attacks?

If so, present it. Preferably to a prosecutor, secondarily to a respected news outlet, but we'll do in a pinch.
Click to expand...

Are the circumstances surrounding Pakistan's General Mahmoud Ahmad payment to the hijackers and breakfast meeting with Senator Bob Graham and Porter Goss on the morning of 9-11 considered evidence or coincidence?

Note: I'm not trying to pull this off topic or change directions (a ploy you claim popular among the CT crowd). I'm just wondering if this might be a more legitimate avenue of discussion.
 
Russell
Welcome,
To the forum, I am tied up Right now working on producing the material that was falling from the towers, you know that bright Yellow glowing stuff at 1000 c.
I am also working on showing how the carbon and sulfur in the High sulfur diesel fuel would have affected the steel in World Trade Center 7.
I have had interesting results so far from simple experiments with only the compounds present in the buildings on that day.
 
amazing.....

has there ever been a "conspiracy theory" to be proven true? or even considered true?

i mean is anything against bush a "conspiracy theory" ? and dismissed as inhannity?
 
So, rearnakedchoke, welcome to the JREF Forum. I have a question.

Do you live within THE DECIDER, like a voice inside his brain, lol, or somewhere else...just asking questions?

TAM
 
So when you put down "THE DECIDER" under your location, what does that mean. I am unfamiliar with any placed named or labeled "THE DECIDER". Please help me to understand.

TAM:)
 
No i think it is THE DECIDER, who was posting over at LC Forum a long time, and then came over to SLC Forum for a while...but I could be wrong...I am just speculating...lol

TAM
 
So do you want to be referred to as rearnakedchoke or THE DECIDER?

lol

and my welcome to the forum still stands, of course.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
So when you put down "THE DECIDER" under your location, what does that mean. I am unfamiliar with any placed named or labeled "THE DECIDER". Please help me to understand.

TAM:)
Click to expand...
just letting you know who it is..... i would usually put "FEMA camp" for a location,
 
T.A.M. said:
No i think it is THE DECIDER, who was posting over at LC Forum a long time, and then came over to SLC Forum for a while...but I could be wrong...I am just speculating...lol

TAM
Click to expand...
"a long time ago" is a few days? ;)

So DECIDER, let's hear your best evidence for CT.
 
T.A.M. said:
No i think it is THE DECIDER, who was posting over at LC Forum a long time, and then came over to SLC Forum for a while...but I could be wrong...I am just speculating...lol

TAM
Click to expand...

LC eh? Sniff, sniff . .

Welcome RNC. MMA fan? Royce was da man!
 
T.A.M. said:
So do you want to be referred to as rearnakedchoke or THE DECIDER?

lol

and my welcome to the forum still stands, of course.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

seeing as how i lost all respect for dylan, im going to spread my wings a bit....

i still KNOW 9/11 was an inside job though...
 
TheGrunion said:
How can you be so sure of this? How much time elapsed between Cheney giving the shoot down order and Cheney receiving word that Flight 93 crashed?

If it was less time than what Cheney believed it would take to implement a shoot down order, then it would have been reasonable for the concept that the plane was brought down by passengers to enter his mind.
Click to expand...

My thoughts exactly.

Besides, these guys are top operatives of the US government, it's possible that this time they got things right.
 
Chuck. He's too hard to keep down and Tito's got no chance standing. KO, rd.2. I'm waiting for Prdie in LV though baby. Fedor is king!
 
WildCat said:
"a long time ago" is a few days? ;)

So DECIDER, let's hear your best evidence for CT.
Click to expand...

i made a very sexy motive thread.....doesnt prove guilt though.. none the less interesting...

going back to unocal having the taleban over to texas in 95 to try and sweet talk them into permitting the oil pipeline.....

the deal turned sour in 98.......thus begins the EVIL taleban saga..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom