• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Thought id say hello

now i know why i was dared to come here. this is your little ambush site

well it wont work lads
 
When I go to the conspiracy theory boards, they do the exact same thing to me.

The way you "fight" the 20v1 mentality is to pick a person who seems to understand what you are saying, and only respond to them.

The 20v1 thing is exceptionally overwhelming, and I agree with you that it's virtually impossible to argue with 20 people and 20 lines of questioning at once.

Just pick one.

If you want to start a thread of just me and you, talking about areas I am comfortable discussing, I'll be happy to do it. Of the things you've mentioned, I'll be happy to discuss your claim that "near free fall" is impossible due to the "laws of momentum".
 
pdoherty76 said:
now i know why i was dared to come here. this is your little ambush site

well it wont work lads
Click to expand...

Name 1 site where posting a dissenting opinion wouldn't result in the exact same "gang-up."

Everyone here has been rather polite to you. Why the insults?

Pick one person and debate that person. the rest of us will wait our turn.
 
nope ive decided to be a coward and run away

u people are impossible to debate

heres how it would go

have u consulted any experts?

so ur disagreeing with all the worlds structural engineers?

Do u have a personality disorder?

im too grown up for this rubbish
 
pdoherty76 said:
nope ive decided to be a coward and run away

u people are impossible to debate

heres how it would go

have u consulted any experts?

so ur disagreeing with all the worlds structural engineers?

Do u have a personality disorder?

im too grown up for this rubbish
Click to expand...

Yes you've clearly demonstrated your maturity. :rolleyes:
 
gravy u stick to harassing people at ground zero who are practising their constitutional right to free speech and ill stick to making sure im there next year to piss u off
 
That is what I suggested, but it seems he has already had a debate with himself, and is opting out. Can't say I am surprised...perhaps a little disappointed. Oh well.

TAM
 
pdoherty76 said:
gravy u stick to harassing people at ground zero who are practising their constitutional right to free speech and ill stick to making sure im there next year to piss u off
Click to expand...

Would you like to comment on my answers? Or are you going to waste your limited time with taunts?
 
pdoherty76 said:
nope ive decided to be a coward and run away

u people are impossible to debate

heres how it would go

have u consulted any experts?

so ur disagreeing with all the worlds structural engineers?

Do u have a personality disorder?

im too grown up for this rubbish
Click to expand...

If you find posting in open threads to be distubring, there is a long and storied history of having debate threads that are 1 on 1, where you have plenty of time to respond and only a single person to deal with.

I completely understand the overwhelming 20 on 1 questioning of your beliefs. I believing running away with them unchallenged is the incorrect course of action.

I challenge my beliefs every day on the conspiracy theorists website and would more than welcome your challenging of mine. If that's not to your taste, so be it.
 
pdoherty76 said:
gravy u stick to harassing people at ground zero who are practising their constitutional right to free speech and ill stick to making sure im there next year to piss u off
Click to expand...
loosers spreading "truth" GZ = excercising rights

gravy spreading truth at GZ = harrassment


gotta love those double standards
 
pdoherty76 said:
ok gravy just me and

1 of me and one of u

its physically impossible for me to debate 20 people, although i would destroy each of u one by one
Click to expand...
As this is a discussion forum, I can't prevent others from posting. If you'd like to name a claim that you believe Loose Change gets right and we get wrong, that can form the basis for a discussion. Be prepared to back your statements with evidence. Your opinions won't do.
 
TAM dont u try calling me a coward, ive debated u people a lot at screw loose change. but in this context it cant work

this is an internet version of american gladiators, its pathetic

u have set up ur little arena and u dare people to come here and take on 20 people

and as i mentioned earlier the christophera post says it all
 
pdoherty76 said:
TAM dont u try calling me a coward, ive debated u people a lot at screw loose change. but in this context it cant work

this is an internet version of american gladiators, its pathetic

u have set up ur little arena and u dare people to come here and take on 20 people

and as i mentioned earlier the christophera post says it all
Click to expand...

I don't see where TAM called you a coward.

I do see where you came in insulting, and appear to be leaving while insulting without actually attempting to have a debate.
 
pdoherty76 said:
gravy u stick to harassing people at ground zero who are practising their constitutional right to free speech and ill stick to making sure im there next year to piss u off
Click to expand...
Oh? Name one person I prevented from speaking at Ground Zero.

Guess who tried, on two different days, to physically prevent us from exercising the same Constitutional right of free speech that they were exercising?

Your side did.

Guess who ripped our literature out of our hands and tore it up?

Your side did.

Guess who took our signs and threw them into a construction area?

Your side did.

Guess who accuses the FDNY of being "In on it?"

Your side does.

Now, pdoherty76, what did my side do?
 
and as i mentioned earlier the christophera post says it all
Click to expand...

Chris has done remarkably well debating many people at the same time (granted he doesn't have much of an arguement).
 
gravy opinions wont do? who do u think u are?

i dont think loose change gets anything right

the pentagon stuff is nonsense, the flight 93 stuff is nonsense, the plane swap nasa type scenario is ridiculous, however the collapse section is somewhat compelling but nowhere near as convincing as other films

i would say in loose change the only thing that really got me thinking was northwoods, if a government can commit that to paper and get it signed by the joint chiefs of staff it shows a mindset that is perfectly capable of complicity in 911
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom