• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Huntsman said:
42?
Click to expand...

No, that was a wrong answer in HHGTTG.

We phycos would never steer you wrong.

If you can't trust the word of someone on the net, who can you trust.

Scary questions demand scary answers.
 
chipmunk stew said:
:nope: ...22.
Click to expand...

23?

DHR said:
We may be getting closer to the hole source of Chris's problems.
Click to expand...

Ew, let me know when I get too close, I don't want to get any on me.

eddyk said:
May I see it?
Click to expand...

That depends, got a $20?

:D

Mancman said:
You find ol' Queeny quite the looker eh? :D
Click to expand...

No, just a fetish for nose picking.

DHR said:
No, that was a wrong answer in HHGTTG.

We phycos would never steer you wrong.

If you can't trust the word of someone on the net, who can you trust.

Scary questions demand scary answers.
Click to expand...

Yep.

Like my new Halloween avatar?
 
I'll show you mine if you show me yours ^^


The CTs over at LC hope to show their clues to someone one day.
 
eddyk said:
I'll show you mine if you show me yours ^^


The CTs over at LC hope to show their clues to someone one day.
Click to expand...

If you only show your clues to those who pay the price well.......
 

Attachments

  • WTC2.coreariel.jpg
    WTC2.coreariel.jpg
    54.9 KB · Views: 3
all emphasis is mine

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, geneva, verdana]Also unique to the engineering design were its core and elevator system. The twin towers were the first supertall buildings designed without any masonry. Worried that the intense air pressure created by the buildingsâ high speed elevators might buckle conventional shafts, engineers designed a solution using a drywall system fixed to the reinforced steel core. For the elevators, to serve 110 stories with a traditional configuration would have required half the area of the lower stories be used for shaftways. Otis Elevators developed an express and local system, whereby passengers would change at "sky lobbies" on the 44th and 78th floors, halving the number of shaftways.
Click to expand...
[/FONT]The inner box at the core of each tower measured about 135 feet by 85 feet (41x26 m). Its 47 heavy steel columns surrounded a large open area housing elevators stairwells and restrooms.
Click to expand...



it won't let me link to my sources, but i'll provide them to you if you want them.
 
Huntsman said:
23?



Ew, let me know when I get too close, I don't want to get any on me.



That depends, got a $20?

:D



No, just a fetish for nose picking.



Yep.

Like my new Halloween avatar?
Click to expand...


I think your Avatar is eating the thermite evidence. COVER UP!!

or maybe nuclear enhanced spiders ate the steel. The fire couldn't harm them because of being NE.

The truth is out
 
Popeholden said:
all emphasis is mine


it won't let me link to my sources, but i'll provide them to you if you want them.
Click to expand...

The term "masonry" referres to actual stone not concrete. Is that source in the UK?

The below is actually very accurate, in some ways. The inside dimensions of the concrete core was 80x120 feet and it was surrounded by interior box columns outside the core. Interior referres to the inner wall of the outer tube of the "tube in a tube" construction. The "MASSIVE BOX COLUMNS" are correctly annotated in that image as ONLY being around the outside.


Quote:
The inner box at the core of each tower measured about 135 feet by 85 feet (41x26 m). Its 47 heavy steel columns surrounded a large open area housing elevators stairwells and restrooms.
 
Christophera said:
The royals protect their fingers.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3509&stc=1&d=1160761998
Click to expand...

Along with your interviews of the construction workers involved, perhaps you could contact people who worked for Otis Elevators about how they designed an elevator system for your concrete core.

All it takes, all it has ever taken, is ONE person, one construction worker involved in the building, one receipt for massive amounts of concrete, one engineer from Otis Elevators who knew about the core, some witness, one picture taken during construction, something, ANYTHING, for you to be taken seriously. I mean seriously. Do you even understand the concept of corroborating evidence?

But no, all you have is a couple inconclusive pictures and a web site full of unsubstantiated and unproven claims. Just remember you can believe anything you want no matter how crazy or bogus; reality doesn't care. It just is.
 
DHR said:
Chris, if you will take the finger from the nose and put it in the ear, do the same with the other hand, now sing "I cannot hear you" and you will have a very good view of how I see you.
Click to expand...

If this is not concrete, what is it?
core​

If you can see and type, you can answer, if you are using your brain.
 
Christophera said:
If this is not concrete, what is it?
core​

If you can see and type, you can answer, if you are using your brain.
Click to expand...

And, for the 100,000th time, we submit that the picture is inconclusive. We therefore request some corroborating evidence that it is indeed a concrete core. What part of that do you not understand?

Even if you dismiss it all, you can't deny we have shown you literally dozens and dozens of bits of evidence supporting a steel core. Yet, all you do is keep posting that same stupid picture as it it trumps everything. Well, IT DOESN'T.

Do you have any other evidence of a concrete core? Specifically during construction, since there's not all the dust concealing everything like in your pictures.

Just one piece of evidence Chris that a concrete core was poured during construction. That's all we ask. Some corroborating evidence to support your theory.
 
twinstead said:
Just one piece of evidence Chris that a concrete core was poured during construction. That's all we ask. Some corroborating evidence to support your theory.
Click to expand...

OR the testimony of anyone who worked on the construction and design of the twin towers that can attest to the concrete being poured for the core. Something that I've asked him to provide evidence of in the last 3 days.
 
Christophera said:
If this is not concrete, what is it?
core​

If you can see and type, you can answer, if you are using your brain.
Click to expand...

Chris I have looked at it time and time again. I see lots of smoke and a tower in the background but no concrete core.

So we are at a crossroads. I love fantasy but we have to live in reality.

Oh Chris "I AM GRAVITY"
 
Huntsman said:
999,999 bottles of beer on the wall, 999,999 bottles of beer,

Take one down, pass it arouns, 999,988 bottles of beer on the wall...
11107451f109db90e3.gif


(Sorry, I got thirsty passing that one around and drank 10 more while singing).
Click to expand...


999,988 bottles of beer on the wall, 999,988 bottles of beer,

Take one down, pass it arouns, 999,993 bottles of beer on the wall...

I bought a Six-Pack for some thirsty guys in here.
11107452fdd37546bc.gif
 
Last edited:
mortimer said:
What part of 'Your own site and drawings on your site cannot be accepted as evidence' do you not understand?
Click to expand...

Watching Chris in action has lead me to a deeper understanding of the SP 911 episode.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom