Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[bonavada]

And Another Thing Christophera..........

why didn't you inform other contributors to THIS THREAD about the long-lost documentary about the "concrete" core? one would think you would be tireless in your fruitless search for this (what would be a) holy grail for conspiracy theorists. and that the like-minded souls encountered there would be very interested in such information. you espouse there (in that thread) much about your "embedded C4" accusations yet fail even once to mention the missing PBS docu. that gives an enormous hint as to your motives here. you fabricate a frankly ridiculous, convoluted story about a non-existent documentary just to re-inforce your entirely groundless ill-informed fallacious ideas about what happened that terrible day.

it seems your arguments here are, at best, based on fallacy but perhaps more likely, that you are just a malicious and self-grandising person bent on carving a niche in some god-forsaken wasteland that is the CT morass.

go see a shrink FFS

BV

Swansea Wales UK

 

[Arus808]

Chris, have you bothered to contact those who were involved in the design and construction of the twin towers? You've now had 24 hours to do so.

 

[TK0001]

Hey guys.

Just popping in to drop the knowledge that they didn't really free fall.

Have we considered this yet?


Thanks,

TK

 

[Bell]

I've answered this question maybe 3 times in the last 6 pages.

There was 2 delays systems, one for the floors and one for the core. The lower core had a slower or less predictable fuse system and took a number of seconds to intitate. It was also safer and would not be inadvertantly detonated by a stray radio signal.

<snip> redundant links

What is the point of detonating it later?

Why did the corresponding part of the outside of the building collapse if not exploded?

 

[Hellbound]

Hey guys.

Just popping in to drop the knowledge that they didn't really free fall.

Have we considered this yet?


Thanks,

TK

All but one of us has.

Now somome seems to have the album "999 lies to support conspiracy" stuck on track 12, "Con-ca-ca-con-ca-ca-concrete core!"

 

[Spektator]

Hey guys.

Just popping in to drop the knowledge that they didn't really free fall.

Have we considered this yet?


Thanks,

TK

Yes, beginning in the first answer to the question, which was the second post in this whole thread.

Won't the mods kill this thing?

 

[Hellbound]

Yes, beginning in the first answer to the question, which was the second post in this whole thread.

Won't the mods kill this thing?

No.

It's the Thread of Sisyphus. Just keep pushing the rock

 

[Architect]

What he said.

BTW, Architect, the building in your avatar: I can't identify it, so I'm wondering -
1) Is it real or an artistic rendering?
2) Were you involved in its creation?

1. It's the planning application illustration.

2. Yes.

It's in Manchester. The British one. We're just finishing it off now.

 

[Bell]

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1991142#post1992412

 

[Belz...]

Won't the mods kill this thing?

Nope. It's the new thread that won't die.

 

[alexg]

Oop's my mistake, but you've correctly interpreted it. The photograper of WTC 2 core did not catch that phase of 2. Correct, I posted the same event at about the same elevation for WTC 1.

Here is WTC 2 just before that which is shown happening to the north tower.

The core lower

So this:

Is the south tower just about to do this:

Time machine!


OK, enough. You couldn't actually believe any of this. You're here for the clicks or the attention or for the fun of puting us on. Which is it? It better be one of the above because the alternative is capitol I insanity.

 

[tsig]

Yes, beginning in the first answer to the question, which was the second post in this whole thread.

Won't the mods kill this thing?

Try asking them.

 

[Blue Mountain]

1. It's the planning application illustration.

2. Yes.

It's in Manchester. The British one. We're just finishing it off now.

Thanks. It looks like the Beetham Tower [wikipedia.org]. Am I right?

Does it have a concrete core? On a more serious note, did the events of September 11 have an effect on the design?

 

[Mancman]

Thanks. It looks like the Beetham Tower [wikipedia.org]. Am I right?

Does it have a concrete core? On a more serious note, did the events of September 11 have an effect on the design?

No, the one in Architects avatar isn't built yet.

The Beetham Tower just opened this week. It actually does have two concrete cores! They were really very prominent during construction.

 

[Bell]

No, the one in Architects avatar isn't built yet.

The Beetham Tower just opened this week. It actually does have two concrete cores! They were really very prominent during construction.

[qimg]http://www.webbaviation.co.uk/gallery/d/3397-1/beetham9995.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://static.flickr.com/25/37328670_72c305de82_o.jpg[/qimg]

You dumb@ss! Don't you know they were removed AFTER construction? Jeez... get your facts right.

 

[mortimer]

Manc,

Those must be photoshopped. If the concrete core is being built higher than anything else, where are the floors not supposed to attach?

 

[Z]

As a related aside, and just to feed Chris' paranoia a bit, I contacted KCET. Apparently, THEY got to the archives a few years ago...

Unfortunately much of KCET's archived collection was destroyed in a fire
several years ago. What survived was transferred to the University of
California, Los Angeles Film & Television Archive.

Eh, I concede. I'm too lazy to go chasing a ghost of a video that never existed through fire, flood, and acts of Bob.

Obviously, the video existed, and THEY destroyed all records of it.

(Damn, that fire was awful convenient..)

(BTW - this just goes to show a true skeptic reveals evidence, whether in support of his points or not... )

 

[Christophera]

Chris, have you bothered to contact those who were involved in the design and construction of the twin towers? You've now had 24 hours to do so.

This is the second (at least) time I said no. Other have done this and there is no response.

 

[Christophera]

Distraction, yes: I'm trying to get you to show people here you have even a single clue. It's a simple experiment, really, akin to flipping a light switch to see if the electricity is on. Answering my questions about floors that held the skylobby and mechanical equipment would show a couple of things:
1. You're willing to work with us instead of calling the whole lot of us names,
2. You are actually capable of locating references and getting information from them.

Now, if you wish to be belligerent, by all means go ahead. The room will empty out eventually, and no one will be left to argue with you.

Waht you really mean here,

1. You're willing to work with us instead of calling the whole lot of us names,

is; That I'm willing to change the subject.

NO.

Get reasonable and you will find I stop calling you names.

If this is not concrete what is it. Drywall is not logical.

core​

 

[Bell]

<snip>
<snap>
<snip>

If this is not concrete what is it. Drywall is not logical.

<snip>redundant link

Why is it not logical?