• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Explosions in the Twin Towers

kc440_

Thinker
K
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
246
I am providing a link to a video from youtube.com that shows ordinary people and fire fighters talking about explosions, a secondary device and detonations, This was as the buildings were coming down. Please watch it.



kc440
 
Last edited by a moderator:

If you want to post a youtube video you only need to bracket it with yt and /yt.
They are talking about explosions, but not explosives.
 
Explosions ≠ explosives, and there was a lot of confusion at the time about bombs. People were panicking. No bombs were ever found, no "secondary devices" were found. Your video proves nothing.

Of course, troofers cherry picking news reports from the confusion immediately following the attacks is par for the course, isn't it?
 
Getting tired of explaining this to the tinfoilers.

THINGS...

EXPLODE...

INSIDE...

BURNING...

BUILDINGS.

Any questions?
 
The firefighters said they heard detonations and that the building(s) came down like demolition. The firefighter illustrates this with his hands. Did you not see that part of the clip? He was an expert on fires, a firefighter and an eyewitness.

Let me put it this way. Osama bin Laden paid for the Islamics to hit the WTC in a way we'd never forget. So a plane flew into each tower. If he could pull this off, why not have bombs planted in the buildings to go off at a certain time?

I don't understand why you are afraid of bombs being there. They hijacked several airplanes, and they had explosives planted in the buildings. Are you saying the terrorists couldn't have done that? Why not? They did everything else to scare us and kill people.

kc440
 
Not to mention those same terrorists definitely had explosives in those buildings in 1993.

However, a youtube video of eyewitness statements is about as far from empirical evidence as one can get.
 
kc440_ said:
The firefighters said they heard detonations and that the building(s) came down like demolition. The firefighter illustrates this with his hands. Did you not see that part of the clip? He was an expert on fires, a firefighter and an eyewitness.

Let me put it this way. Osama bin Laden paid for the Islamics to hit the WTC in a way we'd never forget. So a plane flew into each tower. If he could pull this off, why not have bombs planted in the buildings to go off at a certain time?
Click to expand...

Because flying planes into a tower involes hijacking planes. Planting sufficent explosives to destroy a pair of 110 story tall buildings is vastly more complex, difficult, and costly.

I don't understand why you are afraid of bombs being there.
Click to expand...

No one's afraid of it being true, it simply isn't true. There is no evidence supporting your claim.
They hijacked several airplanes, and they had explosives planted in the buildings. Are you saying the terrorists couldn't have done that? Why not? They did everything else to scare us and kill people.

kc440
Click to expand...

Just because the terroists did X does not mean they did Y. X has evidence supporting it. Y is a cruel fiction you've concocted.
 
explosions? Yeah, large fires in 110 story buildings caused by large airliners is going to be a silent affair.
 
Let me put it this way. Osama bin Laden paid for the Islamics to hit the WTC in a way we'd never forget. So a plane flew into each tower. If he could pull this off, why not have bombs planted in the buildings to go off at a certain time?
Click to expand...

I thought that might be possible early on that day. There has never been any evidence to support it, however. So what was your point?
 
kc440_ said:
The firefighters said they heard detonations and that the building(s) came down like demolition.
Click to expand...

Heard detonations? No, you misquote many of them. They are quoted as saying they heard explosions. However, explosions can be caused by electrical units, the many computers found in a 110 story office building, electrical conduits, cleaning supplies found in a 110 story office building.

Heard does not mean there was any type of explosives.

The firefighter illustrates this with his hands. Did you not see that part of the clip? He was an expert on fires, a firefighter and an eyewitness.
Click to expand...

I illustrate with my hands when I pop a balloon. Does that mean explosives were involved?

I illustrate with my hands when I describe how a volcano eriupts lava. Does that mena explosives were involved?

I illustrate with my hands when Im describing how a water fount is able to give us water to drink. Does that mean explosives were involved?

Let me put it this way. Osama bin Laden paid for the Islamics to hit the WTC in a way we'd never forget. So a plane flew into each tower. If he could pull this off, why not have bombs planted in the buildings to go off at a certain time?
Click to expand...
Because it was a lot easier to hijack planes than it is to wire a building to explode.

I don't understand why you are afraid of bombs being there. They hijacked several airplanes, and they had explosives planted in the buildings.
Click to expand...
Why hijack the planes then if there were bombs in the buildings?

Are you saying the terrorists couldn't have done that? Why not? They did everything else to scare us and kill people.
Click to expand...

Yes the terrorists couldn't have done that. Because the time needed to plant said explosives would be on the length of nearly 4 months and the personnel needed would be over a 100 to do so working 24/7. YOud figure that of the thousands of people who work there morning, noon and night, in a building that is pretty much open 24/7, they'd had noticed someone using cutters to dig into the walls in order to plant said explosives.
 
kc440_ said:
The firefighters said they heard detonations and that the building(s) came down like demolition. The firefighter illustrates this with his hands. Did you not see that part of the clip? He was an expert on fires, a firefighter and an eyewitness.
Click to expand...

Except the buildings did not come down like a controlled demolition. Controlled demolitions do not make buildings collapse starting from a point high in the structure, and they certainly don't make buildings fall from the top down.

Let me put it this way. Osama bin Laden paid for the Islamics to hit the WTC in a way we'd never forget. So a plane flew into each tower. If he could pull this off, why not have bombs planted in the buildings to go off at a certain time?
Click to expand...

The question is, after flying planes into buildings, why would you need to blow them up? Planes flying into two of the world's largest buildings in one of the biggest cities in the world is enough of a terrorist attack, I think. Why spend extra money and time to prepare them to be destroyed hours after the plane impacts when most of the people would have been evacuated?

I don't understand why you are afraid of bombs being there. They hijacked several airplanes, and they had explosives planted in the buildings.
Click to expand...

Hijacked airplanes, yes. Planted explosives, no.

Are you saying the terrorists couldn't have done that?
Click to expand...

I can't speak for everyone here, but, I am saying that.

Why not? They did everything else to scare us and kill people.
Click to expand...

As it's been pointed out, it wouldn't have been necessary.
Also, the largest building to have been demolished in history took a demolition crew of 21 about 7 months in total to investigate the building for demolition, wire it, and blow it up - keep in mind that this was an empty building which was nowhere near the sheer size of WTC 1, 2 and 7. To have wired 1, 2 and 7 would have taken years, years of not getting caught I might add, plus the bombs and detonators would not have survived the plane crashes.
.....not to mention that if you make allegations of bombs bringing down the towers, the arguments for thermate are rendered meaningless.
 
defaultdotxbe said:
there was no evidence of explosives found, doesnt matter who you think planted them
Click to expand...

To be fair, NIST said they specifically did not test for evidence of explosives.

That's not to say they would have if they did, but its important to note.
 
It Doesn't Matter Who

defaultdotxbe said:
there was no evidence of explosives found, doesnt matter who you think planted them
Click to expand...

Guiliani had all the material of those 2 buildings sent to a dump. I think it was just clean up and rescue trapped people. They were looking for cadavers. Those buildings were so incinerated, no one could have found evidence of explosives. All the "evidence" was carted off by Guiliani. I trust the firefighter who was there and illustrated with gestures how the building fell. He is an expert.

kc440
 
kc440_ said:
Guiliani had all the material of those 2 buildings sent to a dump. I think it was just clean up and rescue trapped people. They were looking for cadavers. Those buildings were so incinerated, no one could have found evidence of explosives. All the "evidence" was carted off by Guiliani.
Click to expand...
so now you implicate rudy in a coverup..this is where the explosives theory takes you

besides the stel was still examined, just not in-situ, of course that doesnt matter much when it comes to finding evidence of explosives

not all the floors were on fire, on those non-burning floors there would have been chemical traces of explosives, the remains of blasting caps, steel columns clearly cut by explosives, undetonated explosives, etc

I trust the firefighter who was there and illustrated with gestures how the building fell. He is an expert.

kc440
Click to expand...
this is so dumb its almost not worth responding to

1: since when are hand gesture of how a building fell evicdence of what caused them to fall?

2: since when are firefighters experts on explosives demolitons?
 
Demolition

Sword_Of_Truth said:
Getting tired of explaining this to the tinfoilers.

THINGS...

EXPLODE...

INSIDE...

BURNING...

BUILDINGS.

Any questions?
Click to expand...

But do they explode one floor at a time, systematically, from below the plane crash till all floors have been demolished?

kc440
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom