• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Architect said:
Chris, I don't think that accountable means what you think it means. If you're asking for evidence that I am indeed qualified, then do tell me what information would suffice? RIBA number? ARB? RIAS? Details of education?

Or would they all be part of the Government disinfo plot too?


As for credibility, mate, there's not ONE person on this site who agrees with you regarding the concrete core theory. Tell me why you think this might be?!
Click to expand...

Your numbers are not worth anything here. Only reason has value.

You have failed to provide that, you have no credibility. You are out of the picture.
 
Belz... said:
None of those points are valid, because they ASSUME that what you see in that picture isn't just dust. You haven't shown this to be true.
Click to expand...

What you assert is not reasonable. The image of the WTC 2 core proves it. That dark form is not dust.

Such an assertion reduces your credibility as your sincerity can no longer be supported. Such an assertion in view of the evidence is not reasonable.
 
Chris,

Have you bothered to make contact with the design firm, the construction companies and the Port Authority about the plans for WTC towers?

and dont answer with some bullcrap story about how you tried, but no one was willing to talk with you or that they are now under a "code of silence".
 
Christophera said:
Your numbers are not worth anything here. Only reason has value.

You have failed to provide that, you have no credibility. You are out of the picture.
Click to expand...

OH! that is precious!
First Chris demands proof of Arch's credentials. Arch gives credentials. Then Chris says "AH! that's not important!" and then dismisses him.
OH LORD! That's funny!

Chris You can't even prove that there's any concrete in that picture. The whole core is occluded by dust. Hey, just because you can't imagine that that could be drywall or even denser dust in the core does not mean that it cannot be it.
It is your credibilty that is nonexistant.


P.S. You never responded to my post #5008
 
What you assert is not reasonable. The image of the WTC 2 core proves it. That dark form is not dust.

Such an assertion reduces your credibility as your sincerity can no longer be supported. Such an assertion in view of the evidence is not reasonable.
Click to expand...

This is starting to sound a lot like the Timecube website.
 
"Your numbers are not worth anything here. Only reason has value."

SO even though I can prove that:

1. I'm a qualified, chartered architect

2. Have a track record in tall structures

3. And hold passes in fields such as structures and fire safety

these count for nothing?

What a laugh. Especiallly your quote to the effect that we stand or fall on our reasoning skills, given that this is where you woefully fail.
 
Architect said:
"Your numbers are not worth anything here. Only reason has value."

SO even though I can prove that:

1. I'm a qualified, chartered architect

2. Have a track record in tall structures

3. And hold passes in fields such as structures and fire safety

these count for nothing?

What a laugh. Especiallly your quote to the effect that we stand or fall on our reasoning skills, given that this is where you woefully fail.
Click to expand...

blah blah blah,

With that much hot air you could of answered the question from what, 30 pages back about the flex of steel of long lengths and the effect of bundling the same and the comparitive gains in torsion resistence over a square of the perimeter walls with the proportions of the towers.

You didn't do it then, you didn't do it now, you are fake. Either architect or seeker of truth.
 
Christophera said:
blah blah blah,

With that much hot air you could of answered the question from what, 30 pages back about the flex of steel of long lengths and the effect of bundling the same and the comparitive gains in torsion resistence over a square of the perimeter walls with the proportions of the towers.

You didn't do it then, you didn't do it now, you are fake. Either architect or seeker of truth.
Click to expand...

Physician heal thyself, methinks. :boggled:

I seem to recall - I can't be arsed reading back through the e-mails - that I pointed out that you hadn't asked a real question and seemed to misunderstand the term torsion. Hence there was no valid answer. :confused:

Face it mate, you're nuts. bonkers. Mad. In fact certifiably so, as your ample earlier posts about hypnosis show. :jaw-dropp
 
perhaps you could answer the (4x) question as to when this cloud is going to blow sky high?

11835452bc52f3e976.gif


Lemme guess, you forgot that they only planted c4 in the higher levels?

What else could it be?:D
 
Christophera said:
blah blah blah,

With that much hot air you could of answered the question from what, 30 pages back about the flex of steel of long lengths and the effect of bundling the same and the comparitive gains in torsion resistence over a square of the perimeter walls with the proportions of the towers.

You didn't do it then, you didn't do it now, you are fake. Either architect or seeker of truth.
Click to expand...


The corner is getting smaller isn't it Chris.
 
uruk said:
OH! that is precious!
First Chris demands proof of Arch's credentials. Arch gives credentials. Then Chris says "AH! that's not important!" and then dismisses him.
OH LORD! That's funny!

Chris You can't even prove that there's any concrete in that picture. The whole core is occluded by dust. Hey, just because you can't imagine that that could be drywall or even denser dust in the core does not mean that it cannot be it.
It is your credibilty that is nonexistant.


P.S. You never responded to my post #5008
Click to expand...

The reverse is true.

What is there looks like it must be concrete. The image of the core proves there are no steel core columns.

homer, all that striking your head has given you brain damage.

Recall, this is the internet and fakery is the norm. Accordingly, to separate myself from the fakes, I post raw images and use reason to impliment ALL of them with consistency.

meaning I post another image that can only be interpreted as showing concrete.

 
Christophera said:
The reverse is true.

What is there looks like it must be concrete. The image of the core proves there are no steel core columns.

homer, all that striking your head has given you brain damage.

Recall, this is the internet and fakery is the norm. Accordingly, to separate myself from the fakes, I post raw images and use reason to impliment ALL of them with consistency.

meaning I post another image that can only be interpreted as showing concrete.


Click to expand...



There IS an impressive concrete core, between someone's ears.
 
chris, why are you again ignoring my question, that i've asked two times to you already?
 
Arus808 said:
Chris,

Have you bothered to make contact with the design firm, the construction companies and the Port Authority about the plans for WTC towers?

and dont answer with some bullcrap story about how you tried, but no one was willing to talk with you or that they are now under a "code of silence".
Click to expand...

No, but others have and those folks are not communicating.

You are welcome to try and see if they will act to reinforce the FEMA lie.

I'm betting no. People are done lying for murderers.

Gravy did not find any declarations of engineers in the WTC report and NIST or he would have posted it.
 
Christophera said:
No, but others have and those folks are not communicating.

You are welcome to try and see if they will act to reinforce the FEMA lie.

I'm betting no. People are done lying for murderers.

Gravy did not find any declarations of engineers in the WTC report and NIST or he would have posted it.
Click to expand...


1. See if they will act to reinforce the FEMA lie: A self fulfilling prophecy; if they tell the truth, you call them liars.

2. Declarations of engineers. Yawn. You actually want them to ceritfy that they agree with the report? See item 1, above.

Ye'r nuts mate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom