• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Val McClatchey's camera identified, contained editing software

Status
Not open for further replies.
LashL said:
That's a good idea. Be sure to keep the IP records as well so that he cannot later claim that someone else was impersonating him.
Click to expand...

Or be pro-active and let her know that this information is available; she may or may not know of this forum and if she does not would not know to contact the admins for information.
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
1) You need to know the answers to those questions in order to substantiate your claim.

2) Yes, I was writing up a summary of the thread on the forums. However, I put that on the back burner to address Hoffman's claims of 60 microns. Your point?
Click to expand...
1) What are my claims?

2) just curious when you are finished "debunking" me, that's all.
 
A few notes:

Can edit does not imply did edit.
Saying something false does not imply lying.

You need to prove, including in any court of law, that not only did she have editing software, but she KNEW she had editting software, to prove she was lying. Furthermore, you would need to prove she both had the oppurtunity, and took it, to edit the photo.

As far as I can tell, you've found that she was in possession of editting software that she was unaware of, at worst. You need more proof.
 
If he was doing anything close to this level of harrassment, in real life, not on the net, she would have a restraining order on him. You are nasty KT.

TAM
 
Killtown said:
Sure! It's about time someone did some actually science and not insults.
Click to expand...

Says the guy who makes accusations against innocent people without doing the ten minutes of research required to ascertain whether it's even possible for his unfounded accusations to be true.

Unbelievable.
 
Before this becomes another 70-page monument to ignorance

We've already beat this paranoid delusion of Killtown's to death and beyond.

In this post, poster Arkan_Wolfshade shows the geometry of the crash. The impact crater, the extent of foliage burned, and the debris field are all consistent with Val's photograph.

The photograph is also consistent with the aircraft's true direction of travel and the prevailing wind direction, but not consistent with the direction of travel made up by conspiracists, as shown in this post. Their claim that the aircraft was travelling due west is a result of quote-mining. The FDR and radar data all support the official direction of travel.

In this post I summarized two calculations (done by people who can add numbers properly) that independently showed the smoke plume size was completely credible.

I could go on, and on, and on.

We know that Flight 93 crashed there. Tons of debris were found. Many people witnessed the crash. The cloud of smoke created and seen is right where, when, and how Val McClatchey's photograph says.

And we're supposed to be impressed that she had access to editing software.

Killtown, you have a vendetta against Val McClatchey. You libel her on your website, and here. Your actions are borderline criminal.

But please, go on posting. It only serves to further undermine you.
 
Killtown said:
Well what about her husband?
Click to expand...

Now you are being dishonest. If you want to insinuate that she has doctored the photo, you can't bring up her husband.

It is either her or someone else. When you continue to implicate her in something sinister, you are smearing her name.

Why are you so darn interested in attacking her? She's a human being, who witnessed a terrible event, costing many people's lives.

Have you no decency?
 
LashL said:
That's a good idea. Be sure to keep the IP records as well so that he cannot later claim that someone else was impersonating him.
Click to expand...

And I should have written "posterity", instead of "prosperity"...

How embarrassing :o
 
Killtown said:
Your other stuff was so amazingly stupid that I'm not even going to bother responding, especially about the "echoing" plane!!!!
Click to expand...
so you think echoes are a conspiracy too?


personally i think everything that spews out of your mouth is amazingly stupid, but i still take the time to respond, whats your problem?

so, whats your theory on what happened in shanksville?
 
Anti-sophist said:
1) but she KNEW she had editting software, to prove she was lying.

2) Furthermore, you would need to prove she both had the oppurtunity, and took it, to edit the photo.
Click to expand...
1) Where did I ever say she was lying about not having editing software? Apparently "JREF" is an acronym for "I can't read very well".

2) I did prove she had opportunity along with motive.
 
As always, this moron smears by insinuation and innuendo so that he can play word games and claim that he's just JAQing off.

I'd suggest not giving him the audience that he so obviously craves, but I know how compelling it is to watch him contradict himself and bury himself deeper and deeper in the eternal morass of his paranoia.
 
defaultdotxbe said:
what does that have to do with anything? i have an autographed picture of leonard nimoy on my wall, does that make me jewish?


...actualyl youd probably think it does
Click to expand...

I have an autographed Johnny Bower jersey, an autographed Darcy Tucker stick, an autographed Tragically Hip jersey, and an autographed Johnny Depp photograph. Does that make me a hockey playing, rock star/actor?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom