jhunter1163
beer-swilling semiliterate
But you still have no evidence that the photo was faked. You admitted as much. Leave the poor lady alone. Go back to the Oneonta Onanists.
As I ALREADY SAID, just wanted to point out that she did have access to photo-altering software unlike the Post-Gazette said.If a reporter had asked her (prior to her asking me) if she had access to image editing software, she certainly would have said no. Is that a conspiracy? Or just a mistake.
As I ALREADY SAID, just wanted to point out that she did have access to photo-altering software unlike the Post-Gazette said.
You tell me.And as I said, is this all part of some grand conspiracy, or is it an honest mistake on the part of someone who probably didn't even know she had access to the software?
You tell me.
Well, what were the others, then?
I have ArcSoft Photoimpression suite, the program provided by HP.
Killtown, I had a HP PhotoSmart 315 back in 2001, you pathetic troll.
911 
Jeez, go back and look at the link in #5.Killtown,
1. What software, by name, did she have access to which was capable of doctoring an image to this extent?
2. How is all of this relevant to 9/11 CTs?
Jeez, go back and look at the link in #5.
PS - Read and watch Val calling me out on a Pittsburgh TV station here!
Um, does somebody want to tell Lash, or should I?As usual, you don't provide any straight answers to simple questions; instead, you just try to get people to visit your pathetic conspiracy blogs.
Big deal.5. [Her camera] came with PHOTO-ALTERING software!
Now it is not known if the editing software her camera came with was able to photoshop that plume on her photo and I'm not trying to claim she photoshopped that plume on her photo, but just wanted to point out that she did have access to photo-altering software unlike the Post-Gazette said.
Jeez, go back and look at the link in #5.
1) So, after being comprehensively roasted about your claims that the smoke plume was "impossible," and demonstrating your utter lack of scientific understanding, even an inability to perform basic arithmetic... you come back.
2) And this is the best you can muster:
Big deal.
I suspect that, being a resourceful woman, she would have access to "editing software" even if it wasn't bundled with her camera. So, for that matter, do I. And she happens to be a realtor, for whom pictures are an important part of doing business. Gosh, how suspicious is that.