Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bell said:
Welcome to the forums, Bonavada. I wonder why the heck I'm still argueing with Christopher. No one and nothing can make him see that he is completely, 100% wrong. But hey, you give a shot at it, okay? ;)
Click to expand...

thanks for the welcome Bell.......
i'm also wondering about my motives for traipsing this endless path as well. must be a masochistic streak in me somewhere.

BV
 
Christophera said:
Just becausethe extensive proof of the concrete core found at,

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

is meaningless to those who fearfully believe lies doesn't mean that you, hitting youself on the head repeatedly, gives me an "intellectual beating."

Sow us your intellectual capacity.

If the below image is not the top of tower 2 and its core falling onto WTC 3, what is it.

The core of the top of tower 2 falls on WTC 3
Click to expand...

Your in complete denial. Your completely predictable, You keep running in circles in complete denial of what your pictures show. Give up. Your never going to convince us of what is not there. You have nothing. This whole thread has gone beyond the rational into desprate mania.
 
uruk said:
Your in complete denial. Your completely predictable, You keep running in circles in complete denial of what your pictures show. Give up. Your never going to convince us of what is not there. You have nothing. This whole thread has gone beyond the rational into desprate mania.
Click to expand...

I ones saw this movie called Murder on Denail, with Peter Ustinov. It was a good movie about a murder onboard a ship, on Denail.
 
Did I misspell denial? Damn it Jim! I'm an computer maintenance instructor not an english teacher!
 
Christophera said:
No I don't have that source. I wish now I had tracked the snip I saw on a message board that had it over a year ago. I had actully seen it once but was looking for other stuff and forgot to copy it and its url.

Yes, the elevators could have easily had drywall on all sides. However, since that diagram does not show the core it is a pre Yamasaki diagram and the space inthe core was seriosuly reduced by the thickness of the concrete core, meaning there probably was no room for that. I would bet that elevators were even redesigned so they could be closer together.
Click to expand...
Please define "pre Yamasaki". I'm not sure what you're referring to.

BTW, that diagram is from the FEMA report, and it shows what the 96th floor of WTC 1 looked like on September 11, 2001!
 
David Wong said:
EDIT: This is re: the documentary christophera described two posts back.

This is terrifying, the way the human mind can construct something like that purely from imagination.

From a psychological perspective, how does that work? You need this piece of evidence to exist and so the mind just cobbles it together? Maybe he actually saw some documentary and his memory has just twisted and augmented it beyond recognition, all to fit this theory he's latched onto?

Is that possible? I didn't think it was until now, because I think christophera really does "remember" seeing this, despite 100% of the evidence being to the contrary.

Fascinating. And scary.
Click to expand...
There is good evidence memory is constructive in nature. It's not like a photograph where the brain simply pulls up the image.

The theory that memory is constructive is what helps explain false memory syndrome.
 
Goodness, lock this worthless thread and let it fade away. The kid is a certified liar and/or a nut. Who the fook creates their own website filled with fake evidence to support a theory and cites the website(s) as if it had any validity? Let the clown cry about censorship. Force him to start worthwhile topics or take his material elsewhere.
 
stateofgrace said:
Chris, here is a documentary for you. It is called “Building the WTCs"

I have watched, so should you. There is no, repeat no mention whatsoever of concrete cores.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfGc5tM_oa4
Click to expand...

I already brought it to his attention. He dissmissed it even though it makes no mention or shows a concrete core. And you can clearly see the center steel columns, and see clear through the core area,...etc
 
uruk said:
I already brought it to his attention. He dissmissed it even though it makes no mention or shows a concrete core. And you can clearly see the center steel columns, and see clear through the core area,...etc
Click to expand...

Figures,I should have known.

Chris,please disregard my post and link.
 
This has no doubt been covered before but I think this picture is proof of no concrete core.

1183545299e080f50d.jpg


I'm no expert in building construction so please correct me if I am missing something but it seems to me that the tower on the left could not have a concrete core of any significance, you can see right through the core section of the building. Let me repeat, you can see right through the building! The only kind of concrete core it could have would be on two sides only, and a very thin one at that. What we see is PERFECTLY consistent with the steel core everyone, save Chris, knows to have existed. I know Chris has some vague explanation for this on his website but I couldn't make much sense of it. Perhaps you could spell it out for me again Chris?

The tower to the right, seemingly further along in construction, clearly has something in the core area which at least appears to be more solid. I'm thinking they may have already hung the drywall to the core in that building.

ETA I know you say on your site Chris that there were holes in the core for hallways and doorways, which there surely would have to be for access, but this picture is far too full of holes. The core would have to be some kind of netting around a thousand openings. As it is the non-transparent areas are clearly what would need to be there for the steel core, elevator shafts etc. or in your model, the box columns and elevator shafts. There's not nearly enough dark area for any core walls.
 
Last edited:
118354529a780cbbc8.gif


Here is the core pic from your site for reference. ETA I hope you are not going to claim that that tinyslice of dark in the center of the photograph is the view of the short side of the core because it would not be nearly large enough.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom