Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
uruk said:
The elevators used a suspended cable system, including any "frieght elevators. Anyhoo, there would be only a few frieght elevators in comparison to all the passenger elevators. all those columns in the picture could not possibly justify them being used for frieght elevators.
Here is a picture of the elevator cable wench:

Take alook at pictures from this site:

They contain picture of the core in question from different angles. Where is the concrete wall?

Your simply making things up as you go along. your backed into a corner trying to gab at very flimsy threads.
Click to expand...

Pssst, hey Uruk: He already said that he has hard facts for his theory. So let´s nail him on that one... ;)

Christophera said:
I have raw evidence, hard evidence, of which you have none.
Click to expand...

(click little blue arrow to view his comment)
 
Here's a few more.
Oh and where are the center columns? What holding up the floors?

Where's the concrete?
 

Attachments

  • wtc045_1024x768.jpg
    wtc045_1024x768.jpg
    104.4 KB · Views: 3
  • wtc064_1024x768.jpg
    wtc064_1024x768.jpg
    138.8 KB · Views: 5
  • wtc065_1024x768.jpg
    wtc065_1024x768.jpg
    108.2 KB · Views: 4
  • wtc070_1024x768.jpg
    wtc070_1024x768.jpg
    123.3 KB · Views: 4
  • wtc072_1024x768.jpg
    wtc072_1024x768.jpg
    68.2 KB · Views: 6
Lisa?
11107452129a890f55.gif
 
Chris. Where is your core? You are wong, and have been wrong since day one. Show that you are not totally crazy and admit it.
 
twinstead said:
Chris. Where is your core? You are wong, and have been wrong since day one. Show that you are not totally crazy and admit it.
Click to expand...

Pssst, hey Twinstead: He already said that he has hard facts beside the pictures for his theory. So let´s nail him on that one... ;)

Christophera said:
I have raw evidence, hard evidence, of which you have none.
Click to expand...

(click little blue arrow to view his comment)
 
Brainache said:
Has anyone seen a realistice explanation for Chris's monomania on this concrete core business?

The only one I can see is total insanity.

Just a few posts above he says that his concrete core would have stopped the plane from causing the collapse from happening in the way that it did. He then uses this as proof that the core is real. Most rational people would conclude that the core simply was not there in the first place.

If the core is real, then it must have been rigged to explode. If it was rigged to explode, then everyone connected with the concrete must have been hypnotised to forget about it. How this mass hypnosis was achieved is never explained.

If everyone who denies the concrete was hypnotised, then hypnotists have worked their mesmerism on almost everyone in the whole world except Chris.

These hypnotists have been active for several millennia and have still not managed to control the world, despite being able to sneak into every house on the planet to plant false memories in the minds of several billion people.

So I say to Chris again: You are being delusional and I think you should seek help from someone you trust. Don't believe me if you don't want to, but please think of your kids and at least consider that they would be better off with a dad who spent more time caring for them than the WTC's concrete core.

Cheers.
Click to expand...

This sounds alot like a common delusion amoung schizophrenics. I had a friend who claimed the his parents had the FBI implant a radio transmitter in his head so that his parents could hear his thoughts. He was of course schitzophrenic. It's a small step to a global hypmotist
 
@ADMINS:



Rule4: You will not post "copyright-protected1" material in its entirety, including "hotlinking2" to images or other media.

Rule5: You will not post anything that demonstrates a clear and present danger to the welfare of another person, or otherwise tends to create alarm or apprehension that the welfare of any person is in imminent jeopardy.

Rule6: You will not "spam" or "flood" the Forum.
Click to expand...
 
Christophera said:
You might want to rephrase that first question.
Click to expand...

So your ignoring all those other pictures in favor of your one, single picture?

Your being completely irrational.

All the pictures I posted from that site shows no concrete walls whatsoever.

Your in complete denial.

Oh, and where's and what is this "hard" evidence?
 
Brainache said:
Has anyone seen a realistice explanation for Chris's monomania on this concrete core business?

The only one I can see is total insanity.

Just a few posts above he says that his concrete core would have stopped the plane from causing the collapse from happening in the way that it did. He then uses this as proof that the core is real. Most rational people would conclude that the core simply was not there in the first place.
Click to expand...

It seems you are misrepresenting my statements. Can you quote me to prove I've said this?

Even if you think I have, you have made an error.
 
Chris. the pictures presented to you show NO trace of a concrete core.

And yet, you have the NERVE to suggest we are wrong.

Give it up. Give it up. Give it UP dude. You have NOTHING.
 
Christophera said:
Your question does not seem understandable. Get to that first.
Click to expand...

So now your claiming ignorance.
Ok let me reword it more simply. Show....me...where...the ...concrete...wall...is....in...the...pictures...I...posted.

Where is the concrete wall?

The pictures I posted are of the same thing in the picture you keep posting but from different angles. You know the one with the 17 foot wall?
Where is the 17 foot wall?

Oh, yea. What is the "hard" evidence that you have?
All you seem to have is a bunch of pictures and a web site where you've written what you THINK happened. You have no evidence backing up what you wrote.

WHERE IS THIS "HARD" EVIDENCE?
 
Christophera said:
gwb is a puppet. I sue puppeteers if anyone.

What is hilarious is that you actually think this nation has courts of law. So far, I've not seen that in many years of failing lawsuits.

Law has one purpose, to protect life with reason. Our courts here are not measuring up.
Click to expand...
ADMINISTRATION said:
Rule2: You will not post anything that is considered indecent, pornographic,
obscene, or contains excessive reference to violence.
Click to expand...

He says the gov and/or the "above" leadership killed 3000 people.
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
This I agree with. Meaning that the combustibles were pushed up against the core and the interio box columns burning there and weakening them, causing the tower top to fall to the north.
Click to expand...

Here you say that the debris of the plane etc would have been pushed up against the core, but if there was no concrete core, those combustibles would have ended up on the far side of the building (and they did).

Oops, it fell to the south. Uhhh, .... critical thinking leads me to think that plane impacts had nothing to do with the towers coming down.
Click to expand...

Here you say this proves that the raging fires on the far side of the building didn't affect the stuctural integrity of the tower.

Ohhhh and the towers went to the ground at near free fall rates.
Click to expand...

Here you ignore the fact that rate at which the towers collapsed is perfectly consistent with the mechanism described in the official report.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom