Chavez Says Oil Should Not Fall Below $60/Barrel

BPSCG

Penultimate Amazing
B
Joined
Mar 27, 2002
Messages
17,539
Link
CARACAS, Venezuela (Reuters) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said on Tuesday the price of oil should not fall below $60 a barrel, two days after the OPEC country cut its production to stem price declines.

Oil has tumbled more than 20 percent from peak levels of close to $78 per barrel in July, sparking concerns among some producer nations of a prolonged slump in oil prices.

Chavez said he had ordered Venezuela's cut of 50,000 barrels per day because oil prices had fallen to $65 a barrel, in an apparent reference to world crude prices -- as opposed to Venezuela's own cheaper crude.

"The price of a barrel of oil today should not fall below 60 dollars. That is a fair price," he said in a speech promoting Venezuelan scientific programs.
Click to expand...
I guess he knows what a fair price is better than the market does. Maybe he should get a Nobel Prize in economics.
Only three days ago, Chavez a fair price was $50 a barrel. But at that time it was not clear if he was talking about world or Venezuelan domestic prices.

Venezuela's own crude, which is generally below-average quality, has fallen toward $50 a barrel in recent weeks.
Click to expand...

Meanwhile...
SINGAPORE, Oct. 4, 2006

(AP) Oil prices fell for a third day Wednesday after settling the day before at a seven-month low amid signs of rising global supplies.

Light sweet crude for November delivery fell 18 cents to $58.50 a barrel in midafternoon Asian electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

November Brent crude fell 41 cents to $58.02 at London's ICE Futures exchange.
Click to expand...
 
BPSCG said:
Link
I guess he knows what a fair price is better than the market does. Maybe he should get a Nobel Prize in economics.
Meanwhile...
Click to expand...
Fair. An interesting concept, from dear old Hugo.

What was the price of crude three years ago?

What is so magical about 60 dollars per barrel? Could it have to do with his 3 and 5 year budget forecasts, and his arms purchase plans?

Perish the thought.

DR
 
BPSCG said:
I guess he knows what a fair price is better than the market does. Maybe he should get a Nobel Prize in economics.
Click to expand...

The market isn't that relivant this is oil we are tlaking about.
 
BPSCG said:
:confused:

Care to explain (this should be interesting...)?
Click to expand...

OPEC have a long history of preventing a free market in oil appearing.

There are other problems such as the way oil is sold inflateing certain currencies but OPEC is the main reason why the free market has traditionaly only had a limited ability to decide oil prices.
 
geni said:
OPEC have a long history of preventing a free market in oil appearing.

There are other problems such as the way oil is sold inflateing certain currencies but OPEC is the main reason why the free market has traditionaly only had a limited ability to decide oil prices.
Click to expand...
More specifically, when that particular syndicate agrees to production quotas, or limits production thresholds (and members don't cheat, which occasionally happens) they have a significant input to global supply, which influences bidding prices on both long and short term contracts in the market.

DR
 
geni said:
OPEC have a long history of preventing a free market in oil appearing.

There are other problems such as the way oil is sold inflateing certain currencies but OPEC is the main reason why the free market has traditionaly only had a limited ability to decide oil prices.
Click to expand...
To be precise, OPEC can only control their portion of the oil supply, which will then have an effect on prices. But this is a rather clumsy and indirect way to try to control prices, and has sometimes worked, sometimes not. The late 90's were not good years for OPEC. And in any cartel, the incentive to cheat is always present.

eta: The recent fluctuations in oil prices had little to do w/ supply, and everything to do w/ fear of wars in producing nations (esp. Iran), and even weather in the Gulf of Mexico.
 
Last edited:
WildCat said:
To be precise, OPEC can only control their portion of the oil supply, which will then have an effect on prices. But this is a rather clumsy and indirect way to try to control prices, and has sometimes worked, sometimes not. The late 90's were not good years for OPEC. And in any cartel, the incentive to cheat is always present.

eta: The recent fluctuations in oil prices had little to do w/ supply, and everything to do w/ fear of wars in producing nations (esp. Iran), and even weather in the Gulf of Mexico.
Click to expand...

Of course last I heard opecs target price was 30$ a barrel. Chavez is simply suggesting that they aim somewhat higher. What do you think would happen if saudia arabia cut oil production at the moment?
 
geni said:
Of course last I heard opecs target price was 30$ a barrel. Chavez is simply suggesting that they aim somewhat higher. What do you think would happen if saudia arabia cut oil production at the moment?
Click to expand...
I think if OPEC pushes prices up any higher than they ae now and manage to keep them there alternate energy sources will look a lot better (esp. nuclear), energy conservation will greatly increase, and OPEC nations long-term economic viability will be in serious trouble.

SA and most other OPEC nations know this, and don't want to upset the apple cart. Chavez is too much influenced by the short-term to have seriously considered a real long-term oil pricing strategy. I doubt he'll get his way.
 
WildCat said:
I think if OPEC pushes prices up any higher than they ae now and manage to keep them there alternate energy sources will look a lot better (esp. nuclear), energy conservation will greatly increase, and OPEC nations long-term economic viability will be in serious trouble.

SA and most other OPEC nations know this, and don't want to upset the apple cart.
Click to expand...

That assumes they have been truthful about the size of their oil resevers.


Chavez is too much influenced by the short-term to have seriously considered a real long-term oil pricing strategy. I doubt he'll get his way.
Click to expand...

It is somewhat unlikely. A swtichover to the euro for oil priceing would be about the only way it could rationaly happen.
 
geni said:
Of course last I heard opecs target price was 30$ a barrel. Chavez is simply suggesting that they aim somewhat higher. What do you think would happen if saudia arabia cut oil production at the moment?
Click to expand...
Economically, what should happen is that SA reduce its production like Venezuela. When the price is higher, suppliers prefer to sell more to improve their profits. Likewise, when the price is lower, the supply should be decreased.
 
geni said:
OPEC have a long history of preventing a free market in oil appearing.

There are other problems such as the way oil is sold inflateing certain currencies but OPEC is the main reason why the free market has traditionaly only had a limited ability to decide oil prices.
Click to expand...
Indeed! Their mission is to control the price of oil. Chavez is simply appealing to the OPEC. I would think Iran would also say the same thing right now and I woulnd't be surprised if both decided to highten their rhetoric against the US to force higher prices right now.

http://www.opec.org

OPEC’s mission is to coordinate & unify the petroleum policies of Member Countries & ensure the stabilization of oil prices in order to secure an efficient, economic & regular supply of petroleum to consumers, a steady income to producers & a fair return on capital to those investing in the petroleum industry.
Click to expand...
 
I think Chavez should not fall below two kilometers - so let's push him out of a plane at 2 1/2. No parachute though - messes up the elegant mathmatics. He should make a really great impression!!
 
Last edited:
Chavez Says Oil Should Not Fall Below $60/Barrel
Click to expand...

I suppose he'd say such a thing.

If it does, his "BIG" voice is all of a sudden very insignificant.

Frankly, even though Alaska state and local politicians would be screaming the blues, I hope oil goes back down to $15.

In fact, I'd love to see it go lower...........
 
Huntster said:
I suppose he'd say such a thing.

If it does, his "BIG" voice is all of a sudden very insignificant.

Frankly, even though Alaska state and local politicians would be screaming the blues, I hope oil goes back down to $15.

In fact, I'd love to see it go lower...........
Click to expand...

What you want is rather irrelivant unless you happen to be a major oil producer.
 
BPSCG said:
:confused:

Care to explain (this should be interesting...)?
Click to expand...
Here's how.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/bus...&en=761b1be0dcf304a1&ei=5094&partner=homepage

Oil Prices Rise on Reports of Possible OPEC Cuts

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: October 5, 2006
Filed at 9:16 a.m. ET

LONDON (AP) -- Oil prices shot up Thursday after OPEC's president said the cartel is considering an emergency meeting to discuss cuts in output.

Dow Jones Newswires, citing an OPEC governor, said OPEC ministers agreed to cut 1 million barrels a day from its current oil production levels, with Saudi Arabia cutting 300,000 barrels per day, effective as soon as possible.
Click to expand...
 
FreeChile said:
Here's how.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/bus...&en=761b1be0dcf304a1&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Click to expand...


This really isn't an explanation of how the market isn't relevant, which is what gemi was claiming.

If OPEC does in fact lower production, then market forces will raise the price of oil. And if they increase production, market forces will lower the price of oil.

My point is, for Chavez to claim that some arbitrary price is too low is silly. The supply and the demand determine what the price will be. And if supply goes down, whether due to natural causes (hurricanes that wreck refineries) or man-made (restrictions, cut-backs, or embargoes), the price will tend to go up.

For a very old critique of Chavez's kind of thinking, see here.
 
geni said:
Originally Posted by Huntster
I suppose he'd say such a thing.

If it does, his "BIG" voice is all of a sudden very insignificant.

Frankly, even though Alaska state and local politicians would be screaming the blues, I hope oil goes back down to $15.

In fact, I'd love to see it go lower...........
Click to expand...
What you want is rather irrelivant unless you happen to be a major oil producer.
Click to expand...

Sometimes what they want is irrelevant, too:

This year the petroleum industry observes the 20th anniversary of the Oil Price Collapse of 1986.

No one in the industry who went through that time will, or can, forget it.

In less than 12 months, world crude oil prices fell by more than 60 percent.

The global oil and gas business collapsed like air screaming through the neck of an over-inflated balloon.

Hundreds of thousands of oil workers were laid off.

Texas reported 366,200 jobs related to oil and gas extraction and oilfield equipment in the early 1980s, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

By 1987, only a year after the price collapse, 175,000 of those jobs had vanished.

Company divisions evaporated.

"There were guys with doctorates flipping burgers," is a comment you'll still hear in Houston oil firm offices.

The biggest employer of petroleum engineers after 1986 was said to be Safeway grocery stores.

Texas alone -- just Texas -- lost more than $1 billion in oil and gas severance taxes.

Australia's oil industry spent $740.4 million on petroleum exploration in 1984, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

In 1987, it spent $346.4 million.

The Oil Price Collapse of 1986, coming so quickly and cutting so deeply, created a mindset in the global oil industry that persists to today......
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom