• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Clinton's Dead Bodies List

I read your 2 accounts. Thanks for telling me about them. But I trust my own senses. If Harvey set himself up, why would he declare himself to be innocent and a patsy at the police station, if he wanted to go out with glory? Recently there was that freak named Carr who claimed he killed JonBenet Ramsey. He loved the camera and insisted he did it. But Oswald in police custody and before the press claimed he was innocent.

I've seen many LHO photos. Even as a kid I could tell the Backyard photos were not him.

And you've heard "Thou doth protest too much"? Robert Oswald is vehement about his brother's guilt and has never visited Marina in the years since the crime, nor his "nieces." Why? He is not a blood relative of the 2 girls. He was not Harvey's brother. DNA would prove it.

About Oswald exhumed, the head and the torso are of 2 different people. How did Oswald's head get severed from his body or skeletal remains?

In Mailer's book about Oswald, he describes LHO being arrested in a near riot outside the theater and a merchant seeing the police exit with LHO from the back door of the theater. Mailer might not have understood the implications of what he wrote.

I'm sorry. I can't believe what you do.

kc440

You are quite welcome to your reality

but I don't think it will fit you and me

Therefore I shall just let you be

In the darkness of what you see.
 
I've seen many LHO photos. Even as a kid I could tell the Backyard photos were not him.

Some things can be debunked by kids because they are so obviously wrong. Other things cannot be debunked by kids because they do not know what they are talking about. Be careful you don't confuse the two.

Would you really accept a child's interpretation of evidence over that of qualified professionals?
 
But I trust my own senses.

...

I've seen many LHO photos. Even as a kid I could tell the Backyard photos were not him.
Here you have effectively contrasted the way you work and the way that the regulars here work. We don't trust our senses. We demand evidence, and when evaluating evidence is beyond our abilities, we put trust in the consensus of the subject matter experts.

You can trust your senses if you so choose, but be aware that out of those two ways of operating, sense-trusting very frequently results in wrong answers, and demanding evidence is almost always right.
 
Well, I guess you've taken a step forward, kc440: you're derailing your own threads with JFK assassination nonsense. Am I going to find this everywhere you post? I'd like to know so I can steer clear.

I can see how this thread went astray, but I wasn't the only guilty party. It's a case of all roads lead to Dealey Plaza.

kc440
 
The Problem

Here you have effectively contrasted the way you work and the way that the regulars here work. We don't trust our senses. We demand evidence, and when evaluating evidence is beyond our abilities, we put trust in the consensus of the subject matter experts.

You can trust your senses if you so choose, but be aware that out of those two ways of operating, sense-trusting very frequently results in wrong answers, and demanding evidence is almost always right.

You leave it in the hands of experts. Well, there's a class of experts on jfkresearch.com. Whom am I to believe?

kc440
 
Actually, 9/11 is what finally convinced me that there was no conspiracy surrounding the assassination of JFK. I have watched the trooth movement spring up in the face of such insurmountable evidence for really no other reason than that it satisfies the psychological needs of its believers. Big events must have big causes? Not in the case of 9/11. And it helped me see that I had falled into that trap regarding JFK.

Oswald acted alone.
I second that. That is my story too and I am sticking too it! The fact that both of came to that conclusion must mean their was a conspiracy not to believe this stuff
 
You leave it in the hands of experts. Well, there's a class of experts on jfkresearch.com. Whom am I to believe?

As you say 'a class of experts'

Which 'experts' told you Oswald's head was seperated from his body without even going through the autopsy report to see the explanation?

Which 'experts' have decided that the photos are fake despite several witnesses seeing them, Maria admitting she took them, and markings that indicate that they came from Oswald's camera to the exclusion of all others?

Many CT 'experts' are self-styled amatuers who embarass the term 'amatuer'. Like how every 911 CT'er is a structural engineer, a demolitionist, a fire expert, a metallurgist, and a seismologist all in one.
 
Yeah, but what I want to know is who killed Rooseveldt and McKinley?
Was Grover Cleveland all that people say he was?
 
You leave it in the hands of experts. Well, there's a class of experts on jfkresearch.com. Whom am I to believe?
If you'll notice, I said "subject matter experts." Not "experts at dreaming up wild, unsubstantiated tripe," or "experts in philosophy."
 
My Alternate Universe

You are quite welcome to your reality

but I don't think it will fit you and me

Therefore I shall just let you be

In the darkness of what you see.

Thank you ever so. ;) Are those lines from a song?

kc440
 
Well if pictures are all it takes to convince kc440 I have just seen an amazing video used as a trailer for a radio station which shows that Keith Moon and Elvis Presley are alive and well and gigging with Noel Gallacher, Sheryll Crowe, the Sugababes and Stevie Wonder. It must be true, it was in a moving picture...
 
Well if pictures are all it takes to convince kc440 I have just seen an amazing video used as a trailer for a radio station which shows that Keith Moon and Elvis Presley are alive and well and gigging with Noel Gallacher, Sheryll Crowe, the Sugababes and Stevie Wonder. It must be true, it was in a moving picture...

Radio 2 is run by TEH GLOBALISTS! ;)

Proof!

 

Back
Top Bottom