Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Parsman said:
And you can't help but be impressed by the skills of our ancestors if you do stand at Maes Howe while the sun rises, not sure that the current evidence is that we have made much progress in the last 4,000 years though.
Click to expand...


In Maes Howe, surely?

Personally, I always thought the Viking grafitti told us just how much (or rather little) we had progressed........
 
Chris, maybe you got hypnotized into believing you was not hypnotized.

Or maybe you got hypnotized into believing it is all one big conspiracy and it isn't.

Maybe we are really the ones that aren’t hypnotized but you are.

Seriously Chris, get help mate.
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
The only feasible, realistic explanation for near free fall and total pulverization in existence is found here.
Click to expand...

As has been pointed out to you before, there was neither free fall NOR total pulverization, therefore there need not even be an explanation for them.

Dude. You're crazy, not stupid. You should know better. What's up with that?
 
twinstead said:
As has been pointed out to you before, there was neither free fall NOR total pulverization, therefore there need not even be an explanation for them.

Dude. You're crazy, not stupid. You should know better. What's up with that?
Click to expand...

Willfull ignorance is a sin.

NEAR free fall & total pulverization, except for heavy steel.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

Perhaps now you are getting an idea of how deeply you are deprived.damaged by the lack of a full and open education.
 
Let's agree that there are people out there a LOT smarter than me ...

...people who could read and understand you websites (I couldn't tease the meanig out of them so forgive me.) But even if I don't get it, well, forget about me.

But, what about the smart ones? Once they understand what you have revealed, what do you want them to do to help you turn things around? (I'm assuming you've written this to try to help.)

Miss

Christophera said:
Yes, I understand. The confusion that denial creates really makes it hard to have a clear thread of knowledge.
I have a site that is dedicated to creating an understanding of the unconscious, hypnosis and the various actions I've taken to expose the neglect and incompetence in the field of psychology.
I appreciate your efforts to understand.
Click to expand...
 
Christophera said:
I've been trying to get help for crazies (or people programmed to kill) since 1998 when the county failed to appear on subpoena duces tecum. That is what the Failure to appear on subpoena, interfereing with the appearance of a witness. was about.
Click to expand...

Not every loon is going to get the proper treatment. I suppose this thread is a prime example.

Their superiors are like you. They like things the way they are and do ont want anyone to know about the unconscious mind.
Click to expand...

So, I'm in on it now ? Cool. Did I place that C4 in the WTC towers ?
 
Christophera said:
Notice that belz ignores the date/numerological coincedences between the montreal shootings and the Attias killings here of 4 with a car.
Click to expand...

Interesting argument, since I didn't know about this coincidence. If the powers that be are that smart, why the hell would they place such importance in a symbolism that may very well blow their cover ?

9-11 was carried out partially by people acting unconsciously. The towers were designed to be demolished by people who thought they were doing something for one reason, when actually they were doing it for another.
Click to expand...

Again, why ? Why did they design the towers 30 years ahead of time to be demolished in this fashion ? Wasn't there a better, easier and simpler way to get what they wanted ? Sounds like a bad Deus Ex Machina to me.

People can be hypnotized even if they do not want to be hypnotized. Bottom paragraph. You are wrong and I've proven it. Now will you act to protect lives with your knowledge?
Click to expand...

Anecdotal evidence will not convince me, chris. Some people simply can't be hypnotised, and I can only summise that I'm one of them. I'm simply resilient to that kind of idea. Damn, I can't even do it to myself, let alone let someone else do it. I suggest you do some actual reading!

Do you have any idea WHY the crusades happened? WHY the inquisitions happened? Was the entire thing a delusion after all?
Click to expand...

Please. Educate me.

There is a page there just for you relating to 2 minds. You are sort of right but mostly wrong, This is an excellent compilation from medicine on the right and left brain.
Click to expand...

No, I'm either right or wrong. You have two minds because you have two brains. Normally this isn't a problem because the two are connected. Exactly how another mind could exist there is beyond me, but I'm always ready to learn if you can explain it to me. No links, please. Just the short version.
 
Brainache said:
From what I have read here at JREF it appears that the centre of gravity would have to shift a long way before the top could topple.
Click to expand...

If the supporting structure below it were undermined then the tilt over the centre of gravity would not have to be as great.

When I get 5 minutes I'll do some brief sketches to explain a little better.

BTW I am not advocating that explosive charges were used to undermine the tower. At least not yet ;)
 
Last edited:
A diagramatic explanation of what you mean, and how it would make the toppling easier, would be appreciated, if you are trying to convince us of this point.

TAM
 
Well. The musician 'Poe' wrote a song with the lyrics "you can't talk to a psycho like a normal human being".

I am beginning to suspect she was right.
 
Christophera said:
Perhaps now you are getting an idea of how deeply you are deprived.damaged by the lack of a full and open education.
Click to expand...

Uh, no, perhaps I am getting an idea of how deeply out of touch with reality you are, my dear crazy person.

But, I do respect people who stay true to themselves no matter what.

Rock on, crazy dude. Rock on.
 
missyvanwinkle said:
...people who could read and understand you websites (I couldn't tease the meanig out of them so forgive me.) But even if I don't get it, well, forget about me.

But, what about the smart ones? Once they understand what you have revealed, what do you want them to do to help you turn things around? (I'm assuming you've written this to try to help.)

Miss
Click to expand...

Well, ...... smart doesn't have much to do with understanding this information. It is more conditioning. If you are like belz you are conditoned unconsciously to think that science already knows enough and that everything else is there to ridicule.

http://members.tripod.com/truthasaur/

Once a few power people understand, they will communicate to others that our entire system of; mental health care, education, the courts, law enforcement, has been deprived of a tool that will greatly improve our ability to adapt and survive. To protect our environment by creating behaviors that are sustainable rather than ones that feed corporatons the profits they want.

We are missing about 70% of the sentience we might know in our lives,
 
Belz... said:
Again, why ? Why did they design the towers 30 years ahead of time to be demolished in this fashion ? Wasn't there a better, easier and simpler way to get what they wanted ? Sounds like a bad Deus Ex Machina to me.
Click to expand...

I thought about this one and figured out one reasonable scenario.

In the case of damage to the structure (not necessarily terrorist damage) a suitable designed and controlled failure would result in far less risk of damage to the surrounding real estate and potentially reduced loss of life.

I wouldn't even think it unreasonable that despite knowing that people were alive up there then someone ultimately had to make a decision to cut the losses and bring it down.

It doesn't have to have any sinister conspiracy overtones.
 
T.A.M. said:
A diagramatic explanation of what you mean, and how it would make the toppling easier, would be appreciated, if you are trying to convince us of this point.

TAM
Click to expand...

When I get 5 minutes I will do that and scan it in TAM. I also have a serious problem with the FEMA report in how it has diagramatically represented the stresses but more on that later.

Is there a limit on the size of pictures you can upload?
 
Originally Posted by Christophera View Post
Notice that belz ignores the date/numerological coincedences between the montreal shootings and the Attias killings here of 4 with a car.

Belz... said:
Interesting argument, since I didn't know about this coincidence. If the powers that be are that smart, why the hell would they place such importance in a symbolism that may very well blow their cover ?
Click to expand...

The individuals have not blown their cover. The idea is that folks like you realize that we do not know everything about the mind and that it is what we don't know that is the problem.

Nov. 19, 1999, Deming, N.M. 1 killed

May 20, 1999, Conyers Georgia, 6 wounded

April 20, 1999, Littleton, Colo., 15 killed, 22 wounded

May 21, 1998, Springfield, Ore., 2 killed, 22 wounded

May 21, 1998, St. Charles, Mo. , Plan modeled after Jonesboro uncovered

May 21, 1998, Onalaska, Wash., 1 killed

May 21, 1998, Houston Tex. , 1 wounded

May 19, 1998, Johnston, R.I., Threatening notes

May 19, 1998, Fayetteville, Tenn.,1 killed

April 24, 1998, Edinboro, Pa., 1 killed

March 24, 1998, Jonesboro, Ark., 5 killed, 10 wounded

Feb. 19, 1997, Bethel, Alaska., 2 killed, 2 wounded

is this enough?
 
Christophera said:
Originally Posted by Christophera View Post
Notice that belz ignores the date/numerological coincedences between the montreal shootings and the Attias killings here of 4 with a car.



The individuals have not blown their cover. The idea is that folks like you realize that we do not know everything about the mind and that it is what we don't know that is the problem.

Nov. 19, 1999, Deming, N.M. 1 killed

May 20, 1999, Conyers Georgia, 6 wounded

April 20, 1999, Littleton, Colo., 15 killed, 22 wounded

May 21, 1998, Springfield, Ore., 2 killed, 22 wounded

May 21, 1998, St. Charles, Mo. , Plan modeled after Jonesboro uncovered

May 21, 1998, Onalaska, Wash., 1 killed

May 21, 1998, Houston Tex. , 1 wounded

May 19, 1998, Johnston, R.I., Threatening notes

May 19, 1998, Fayetteville, Tenn.,1 killed

April 24, 1998, Edinboro, Pa., 1 killed

March 24, 1998, Jonesboro, Ark., 5 killed, 10 wounded

Feb. 19, 1997, Bethel, Alaska., 2 killed, 2 wounded

is this enough?
Click to expand...

It goes from 1, to 2, to 4, to 2 to 1 ?
Thus? :confused:
Please, educate me.
 
William Rea said:
I thought about this one and figured out one reasonable scenario.

In the case of damage to the structure (not necessarily terrorist damage) a suitable designed and controlled failure would result in far less risk of damage to the surrounding real estate and potentially reduced loss of life.

I wouldn't even think it unreasonable that despite knowing that people were alive up there then someone ultimately had to make a decision to cut the losses and bring it down.

It doesn't have to have any sinister conspiracy overtones.
Click to expand...

Please do... go on....
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom