Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[Gravy]

The point being that you said the top twisted and not only can I find pictorial evidence that the top toppled there is also a caption that confirms this. Both of these things appear to be in the official report, and both of these back up my theory to an extent. The question I ask myself now is why the top didn't continue to topple once the forces were unbalanced in favour of this?

Because it was also falling straight down in addition to leaning and twisting.

 

[Brainache]

The point being that you said the top twisted and not only can I find pictorial evidence that the top toppled there is also a caption that confirms this. Both of these things appear to be in the official report, and both of these back up my theory to an extent. The question I ask myself now is why the top didn't continue to topple once the forces were unbalanced in favour of this?

From what I have read here at JREF it appears that the centre of gravity would have to shift a long way before the top could topple.

I have no idea where you got the idea that the unconscious compulsive hypnosis by people of or associated with the Masonic order in Australia was associated with 9-11. Are you saying that to try and confuse people?

Well Chris you said that the reason I and others didn't accept your loonatic assertions about the construction of the WTC was because of some post hypnotic suggestion planted by hypnotists in our childhoods.
This suggestion was supposedly triggered by mention of "cocrete cores".

Do you begin to see just how insane this is?
(I knew taking him off ignore was a mistake)

 

[Gravy]

it was hit on the north side but fell south.

There is an explanation,

Yes, there is.

​

 

[ghost707]

I started reading this thread a while back....and have just now returned to see where it is at.

Either christophera is just having fun pulling everyones' leg, or he is quite insane.

There is not a 3rd explanation that I can think of.

 

[Bell]

I'll go with insane. It' a bit sad, actually

 

[Z]

I see some of you discussing the Adyge. They have nothing to do with the term circa. But, then, I expect you know that already.

Whatever lifeless spirit is sending such suggestions should be properly ignored. Offer his spirit your light, but do not offer communication with his corpse.

 

[Christophera]

The June bug

done already, i see nothing connecting them to the etymology of circa or circadian

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63738

I have to refer again to the victims of an educational conspiracy and your official etymological sources.

Let us go back into the original Latin uses relating to an insect that makes shrill noise on June 21st. The June bug.

cicada

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source
ci‧ca‧da  /sɪˈkeɪdə, -ˈkɑ-/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[si-key-duh, -kah-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun, plural -das, -dae /-di/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[-dee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation.
any large homopterous insect of the family Cicadidae, the male of which produces a shrill sound by means of vibrating membranes on the underside of the abdomen.
[Origin: 1350–1400; ME < L cicāda]

The relation of Latin to the circassians is historical beyond any of our records. I do believe I've made my point.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

I do believe I've made my point.

by taking another word from latin yet still showing no relation to cassians? no, i dont think so

besides, what difference does it make? are you saying the circassians did 911? or was it the druids? or the egyptians?

 

[Christophera]

by taking another word from latin yet still showing no relation to cassians? no, i dont think so

besides, what difference does it make? are you saying the circassians did 911? or was it the druids? or the egyptians?

My point is that formal oral histories of ancient earth are traditionally kept with hypnosis wherein the circadian rhythm is exploited (pioneered by the circassians) used also by the Masonic Order who has been infiltrated through its oral histories and turned against it's higher purposes or used to create towers built to demolish.

I know you won't want to understand that but pretending you don't won't look good.

 

[Christophera]

What Pitiful Opposition

I'll go with insane. It' a bit sad, actually

You act as if we knew everything about the mind, or at least you do. (not)

Of course you cannot even prove the towers core to be as FEMA states it was by using the absolutes of the demolition photos. Where I can do it over and over.

core​

The site,

http://concretecore.741.com

has redundant proof from images of the demolition as well as links to web sites of universities and engineers, not at all CT'ers as those here would term many sites.

And all here have utterly failed to explain rates f fall near free fall as well as total pulverzation, how pitiful when they act so superior.

here is the only feasible and realistic explanation for near free fall and total pulverization on the web.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

 

[Parsman]

I actually registered because I wanted to correct Christophera's mistaken history here (Druids built Stonehenge? Different culture/religion/history/tradition/race from the original builders and it is doubtful if any organised community use of the Stonehenge site for the whole of the celtic iron age) but reading on... you can't argue with this guy from evidence or facts can you? Sorry that this revelation came to me a bit late, but the patience and intelligence of your replies to this guy shows that you forum members of long standing have far more patience and grace than I could ever manage. I do think it would be kindest to leave him to his delusions, he won't change.

 

[gumboot]

You act as if we knew everything about the mind, or at least you do. (not)

While we may lack the ability to diagnose people with minor psychological disorders, if a naked man runs past me in the middle of the night howling at the moon, smearing peanut butter over his private parts, and screaming "I'm the little teapot boy, I go BOO!" I would feel fairly confident diagnosing him as [rule8]ing crazy.

-Andrew

 

[Bell]

You act as if we knew everything about the mind, or at least you do. (not)

Of course you cannot even prove the towers core to be as FEMA states it was by using the absolutes of the demolition photos. Where I can do it over and over.

core​

The site,

http://concretecore.741.com

has redundant proof from images of the demolition as well as links to web sites of universities and engineers, not at all CT'ers as those here would term many sites.

And all here have utterly failed to explain rates f fall near free fall as well as total pulverzation, how pitiful when they act so superior.

here is the only feasible and realistic explanation for near free fall and total pulverization on the web.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

Indeed I do not know everything about the mind. But is is a save guess non the less. Seriously, Christophera, SEEK HELP.

And yes, those pictures are not redundant evidence of a concrete core inside the WTC, which did not fall near free fall and did not totally pulverize. The buidings contents prety much did pulverize, however.

 

[Belz...]

The Neolithic era is inhabited by people that are unnamed. They could easily be the ancetors of the Celts and Druids were their preisthood.

What about hte word CIRCA. What is its meaning?

Don't forget the hyborian age.

 

[Belz...]

Yes, as far as I can tell, the hypnotisim I refer to is conducted unconsciously, a state I'm sure is deeper than subconscious implies.

We're inventing psychological entities, now ? Does it have a concrete core and, if not, how does it relate to this thread ?

 

[missyvanwinkle]

Morning Chris,

I was going to try to chat with you by asking questions one at a time and waiting for individual answers, but it seems my posts were kinda' just "one in the crowd" and didn't get the attention they deseved. <smile> But, in the intervening wait time, I decided to change of my conversation.

Soooooo, from reading your recent posts, I have some new ideas and questions I need your help with:

As I understand it now, you're the only one who comprehends the enormity and interconnectedness of all these things -- but you seem to be having a difficult time persuading The Powers That Be of your knowledge. Is that right? In real life (not cyber) no one else knows what you know? Not even a friend? (You know how notoriously bad at keeping secrets they are! You can't tell friends anything without them blabbing.)

If you're the only one who gets it, then where to from here? What happens when you finally bring the evidence to light in real life and get it through everyone's thick skulls? What will the result be?

I'm apparently a victim of the system and need elucidation,
Miss
P.S. Old business:
It still wouldn't hurt my feelings if you straightened me out on the seeming disagreement between the evidence you posted that said a person undergoing hypnotism had to be a willing participant and your saying it was done unconsciously.

You act as if we knew everything about the mind, or at least you do. (not)
Of course you cannot even prove the towers core to be as FEMA states it was by using the absolutes of the demolition photos. Where I can do it over and over.
<URL clipped>
The site,
<URL clipped
has redundant proof from images of the demolition as well as links to web sites of universities and engineers, not at all CT'ers as those here would term many sites.
And all here have utterly failed to explain rates f fall near free fall as well as total pulverzation, how pitiful when they act so superior.
here is the only feasible and realistic explanation for near free fall and total pulverization on the web.

<URL clipped>

 

[Belz...]

I have proven that the world of clinical psychology considers hypnosis on children under five "Too disorienting".

It is very likly you were hypnotized at age 3 if I am on ignore.

Is everyone in the world hypnotised ? And, if so, why aren't you ? 'Cause I'm not from the US!

CIRCA refers to circadian, as in the circadian rhythm as in the biological clock as in oral histories (hence approximate). Do you know where the term originates, which people?

You just like to make up things as you go, don't you ? So do I, but I seel that as fiction...

[drivel...] The Circassians use the Winter Solstice sunrise to create chronological accuracy as well as can be expected, or perhaps better over many generations.

That's an unreliable clock if I ever heard of one.

The specific language indicating interference with the appearance of the witness. The words "Have been advised" and "to advise you" indicate interference.

Not necessarily.

 

[Belz...]

The point being that you said the top twisted and not only can I find pictorial evidence that the top toppled there is also a caption that confirms this. Both of these things appear to be in the official report, and both of these back up my theory to an extent. The question I ask myself now is why the top didn't continue to topple once the forces were unbalanced in favour of this?

It didn't topple, obviously. It tilted. Once all its supports failed, it went down. Simple as that.

 

[Belz...]

Are you speaking of the north tower? Impossibly it was hit on the north side but fell south.

"Impossibly" ? Based on what ?

My point is that formal oral histories of ancient earth are traditionally kept with hypnosis wherein the circadian rhythm is exploited (pioneered by the circassians) used also by the Masonic Order who has been infiltrated through its oral histories and turned against it's higher purposes or used to create towers built to demolish.

And why, oh, why would they do this ? Pray tell.

 

[NobbyNobbs]

While we may lack the ability to diagnose people with minor psychological disorders, if a naked man runs past me in the middle of the night howling at the moon, smearing peanut butter over his private parts, and screaming "I'm the little teapot boy, I go BOO!" I would feel fairly confident diagnosing him as [rule8]ing crazy.

-Andrew

Nominated.

And you owe me a new keyboard. Mine now has orange juice all over it.