Ok then show me if you did your homework, I'm curious about the results tomorrow
http://members.lycos.nl/einsteen/
First off, you said that after 95 pages there was no realistic explanation. I just pointed to the NIST website, as they have investigated the collapses.
Second, even though I'm not qualified to examine the collapse, I find nothing courious about it, and that includes the squibs (giggle). And the fact that almost all structural engineer agrees with the findings, does prove a point, I'd say.
I've seen the conclusions of the NIST investigation, not the entire report where for examples all the calculations are presented. I confesse, I'm not as smart or as educates as some around here. That doesn't mean I can have an opinion on something.