• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
wow! this thread finally made it off the front page.

I just wanted to post this link here since this thread was so popular and it goes along with the rest of the warnings and help I was trying to offer you.

http://www.parkc.org/GeneticEngCancer.htm

I'm not saying that I KNOW what and how this happened either, but if you are interested in reading some non-controversial and incriminating evidence against the USG, or one that contains evidence that the ARE intentionally destroying our health on purpose...
walla !

http://www.mindfully.org/Farm/Green-Revolution-Revolving.htm

for you wise guys, this should read like a quick "howdy doody" episode, and it appears to be almost as simple for most people to understand.

http://www.mindfully.org/GE/GE3/rBGH-Got-Pus.htm

food for thought ?
 
So, seriously, if I leave and come back five years from now, are people still going to be having these exact same discussions?
 
David Wong said:
So, seriously, if I leave and come back five years from now, are people still going to be having these exact same discussions?
Click to expand...

Yes and no.

By that time, we'll have a new "click and post" interface. You won't actually have to type put your arguments. The CTers will select theirs from a drop-down list box, and then a reply will be automatically generated including links to the 27+ posts that have already been made debunking this argument.
 
You NWO shill, quoting the good Mr. Avery out of context again. The entire quote was:

"it wasn't a virgin, none of them were"
Click to expand...

And has he stopped beating his goats?? (or gooses)
 
Jennie C. said:
Can't we make him defile a goose? It would help with Goose Change....
Click to expand...

That's the great thing about CTs - this would just as well if you asserted that Dylan were defiling goats, or geese, or bigfoot :D Just like the 9/11 CT works just as well if were talking about the CIA or MI6 or Jews or masons or big lizard aliens being responsible for the conspiracy. I agree, though - it was definitely the geese that were responsible ;)
 
Extra-Bwahahaha!

2) I finally received a reply from Mark Roberts (at itmatters@mail.com). It was received two days after my email, which is odd for an "out of office" reply, which are usually immediate. Also, the email text is embedded with a lot of cryptic gibberish of the form:

BarrilleauxChek
Chek=No
Hold Not Approved
NoDirectAuth
ttBlockSatAutoresponse
UpSat
...
Waiting
Rerouting
ConnectNSAConnectprotocolNSAMD-NSANYC003
Waiting for authorization
NSApga1rraunogitd1lkg10r018y5h82_qrnbpif2h-85u1njb3]0I)OOOafbabqo__*MarkRobertsPseudoGo
EncryptAuthMarkRobertsMerck1ConAg1Archer1Archer2KBR18yq3iujyo
...

Anyone want to venture a guess as to what this might be? I've never seen this before and neither have any of my colleagues.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Loose_Change_(video)#Mark_Roberts_critique
Click to expand...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Loose_Change_(video)#Mark_Roberts_critique
 
Last edited:
this is kinda liek when your playing with your dog with a tennis ball and you make like you throw the ball and but you actually hold it and the dog goes running after nothing

poor little CT-puppies.....
 
defaultdotxbe said:
this is kinda liek when your playing with your dog with a tennis ball and you make like you throw the ball and but you actually hold it and the dog goes running after nothing

poor little CT-puppies.....
Click to expand...

The crazy thing this, not only do they run after it - they find it and bring it back!
 
The really sad thing is that someone on Wikipedia was being nice and told him that I posted here as Gravy, and gave the link. I also gave him my regular email addy, which I check more often. But did he check here or try my other email? Noooooooooo, that would go against every CT precept.
 
But did he check here or try my other email? Noooooooooo, that would go against every CT precept.
Click to expand...

Hehe, fish'en for fools is fun! You caught a keeper. Wiki Bwahaha......
Screen shot worthy?
 
2) I finally received a reply from Mark Roberts (at itmatters@mail.com). It was received two days after my email, which is odd for an "out of office" reply, which are usually immediate. Also, the email text is embedded with a lot of cryptic gibberish of the form:

BarrilleauxChek
Chek=No
Hold Not Approved
NoDirectAuth
ttBlockSatAutoresponse
UpSat
Click to expand...

You are a baaaaad man.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom