Architect, considering you cannot understand questions about load bearing capacities related to deformations of bearing structure, you hardly have any credibility, or no more than anybody else with a keyboard.
I can see no inherent respect for human values, reason and principles or the capacity to use an idea that would protect children, life, now and in the future, such as justice with truth, protecting rights and freedoms. You demonstrate far less awareness of principles than others here do.
In the realm of reason you suffer badly.
You have not shown in a way meeting simple and logical criteria for consistency with raw evidence of photographic nature from the scene, to support a position you actually have never made and rarely mention. The steel columns, remember? You could never produce a photo of the core that actually showed the same size of vertical steel as the obvious heavy columns around the outside of the core. What comprises the spire, held up there by the remnants of concrete shear wall.
What you and yours produced were misrepresented construction photos showing NO heavy columns in the core. Or the shot with the core to the left, on the top floor with interior box columns on the left. The shot is not loking out into the core.
Here is genuine evidence showing a concrete shearwall holding up a sagging steel column.
http://algoxy.com/psych/images/corewallspirearrows.gif
Hard, raw evidence Archie.