We have untrained, inexperienced people who think they know demolition techniques and effects, structural engineering, physics, jet aircraft capabilities, passenger aircraft capabilities, material strengths, etc better than the vast majority of recognized experts in the field, based on misinterpretatitons and ignorance (used in the actual meaning of the word-lack of knowledge). We have people who latch onto one or two unclear staements from a several-hundred page report, or a single still photo from a poor angle of one of the buildings, and wave it around as if it were "proof" of anything beyond their inability to interpret photos and videos and their ability to ignore the totality of evidence. We get people who come on here and make the exact same arguments that have been debunked several times already, but the truth apparantly doesn't mean enough to them to read a few pages where these issues have already been discussed.