Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[Ducky]

Except for the weather controlling thing, the government does control it, that's why the skies where blue that day. Made it easier to put in a CGI airplane.

But seuriously, I really don't understand how all of you keep your cool with all these deniers, and asking questions and answering questions time and again. Must feel like talking to a brick wall?

It's what we do.

Where else on the net will you find people that when unsupported claims are made, will actively search for evidence to support or disprove?

All of my socks are banned now at the LC forum (except the three I gave away) so I haven't been over there in a while, but I would bet you will find no one actually quoting source documents. Everything is a copy of a copy of a photoshopped copy and no one making any claims about NIST or PBS would go directly to the source and get those documents.

That's why it is easy to keep our cool. It is easy to get facts from the source and make people look like idiots.

All that said, Gravy has the patience of a saint. I don't post much in these threads anymore because I kept having to replace my displays after punching them due to offensive, stupid and ridiculous statements made by CTers.

Nothing pisses me off more than seeing Avery laugh and get catty about victims on the planes. The part where he makes fun of the phone calls home from the victims on a particular flight is so horrifyingly offensive he'd better hope we never meet in a dark alley.

 

[Christophera]

Maybe you should look at the pictures, again, and at the videos linked that clearly show the steel columns failing, with no concrete in sight, and your oft-vaunted "concrete core" invisible, in every way..

DUH, typical. Steel columns are NOT "core columns"

I know steel columns are seen falling. I know that they are interior box columns which surround the core. Nto "core columns".

 

[Christophera]

I got a call from Rosie in Viewer Services and she has tracked down the only construction video/documentary they can find and it was done in 1983, and was for the Port Authority.

I have requested a copy be sent to me.

However from the discussion with the programming folks (and being bounced around the phones a bit) that footage was re-used in many of the 911 documentaries since. It also doesn't show what Christophera describes.


Now, Christophera:

I have put to rest once and for all that PBS did NOT produce what you said. Therefore you may now retract your inaccurate statements.

What wishful thinking.

The video Rosie refers to was also mentioned in the 1990 video which was 2 hours in length. It was refered to as a "celebratory" video of the completed construction, not an intimate documentary of the constrcution.

I knew on 9-11 that the documentary I saw was gone.

If you beleive that PBS was no infiltrated before 9-11 and the video I saw removed from their records, you are also capable of believing in Santa.

You real problem is that the supposed steel core columns are never seen in the demo images, not that you cannot find a copy of the documentary I viewed in 1990.

 

[Bell]

What wishful thinking.

The video Rosie refers to was also mentioned in the 1990 video which was 2 hours in length. It was refered to as a "celebratory" video of the completed construction, not an intimate documentary of the constrcution.

I knew on 9-11 that the documentary I saw was gone.

If you beleive that PBS was no infiltrated before 9-11 and the video I saw removed from their records, you are also capable of believing in Santa.

You real problem is that the supposed steel core columns are never seen in the demo images, not that you cannot find a copy of the documentary I viewed in 1990.

Let me get this right. The video you aledgely saw on PBS or BBC or wherever was confiscated by the government? And you say WE are capable of believing in Santa?

 

[KingMerv00]

What wishful thinking.

The video Rosie refers to was also mentioned in the 1990 video which was 2 hours in length. It was refered to as a "celebratory" video of the completed construction, not an intimate documentary of the constrcution.

I knew on 9-11 that the documentary I saw was gone.

If you beleive that PBS was no infiltrated before 9-11 and the video I saw removed from their records, you are also capable of believing in Santa.

You real problem is that the supposed steel core columns are never seen in the demo images, not that you cannot find a copy of the documentary I viewed in 1990.

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

*Sigh*

Am I the only one getting the image of Navy Seals storming the PBS archives?

 

[Belz...]

DUH, typical. Steel columns are NOT "core columns"

I know steel columns are seen falling. I know that they are interior box columns which surround the core. Nto "core columns".

It must be fun, making all those unsupported assertions without ever bothing to verify them.

They seem pretty damn thick for box columns. Are you SURE they're not steel columns ?

 

[Peephole]

Troother: 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!! WE HAVE THE EVIDENCE!!!!!

Skeptic: So where is the evidence?

Troother: IT WAS CONFISCATED BY THE GOVERNMENT!!!!!!

Skeptic:So you have no evidence?

Troother: Errr.... LOOK OVER THERE, 3" REBAR ON 4' CENTERS !!!!!1111

 

[Belz...]

I knew on 9-11 that the documentary I saw was gone.

If you beleive that PBS was no infiltrated before 9-11 and the video I saw removed from their records, you are also capable of believing in Santa.

So... you think the evil gubmint ninjas stormed PBS and took the documentary from them because... it would... tip... structural engineers... around the globe to the fact that... there was a... concrete core ?

Why ?

You real problem is that the supposed steel core columns are never seen in the demo images, not that you cannot find a copy of the documentary I viewed in 1990.

Just like there is NO, I repeat, NO concrete in THIS image.

At all.

 

[Alareth]

At this point I'm not sure what I believe:

A: Christophera is simply a troll trying to see how long he can string this thing on just for laughs

or

B: He really is so completely deluded that he belives what he says.

I really hope it's option A because for it to be otherwise is truely too depressing and pathetic to contemplate.

 

[Alareth]

Troother: 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!! WE HAVE THE EVIDENCE!!!!!

Skeptic: So where is the evidence?

Troother: IT WAS CONFISCATED BY THE GOVERNMENT!!!!!!

Skeptic:So you have no evidence?

Troother: Errr.... LOOK OVER THERE, 3" REBAR ON 4' CENTERS !!!!!1111

Skeptic: We have verifed, undeniable evidence that says you are wrong.

CT: There is absoulutely no evidence to prove our claims. Thats proof it was destroyed to cover it up.

 

[chipmunk stew]

If you beleive that PBS was no infiltrated before 9-11 and the video I saw removed from their records, you are also capable of believing in Santa.

I'm on the edge of my seat here--tell me about your daring escape from the mind-erasers!


This quote is all anyone ever needs to read to understand Christophera.
If I had room, I'd add it to my sig.

 

[Dave_46]

Architect.

He's seen those pictures, or some similar ones before. What a sensible person calls the core columns he calls interior box columns, or something similar. They are apparently there to support the formwork for the concrete, which is poured seven storeys behind the rest of the construction (yes, I know its crap).

Dave

Told you

DUH, typical. Steel columns are NOT "core columns"

I know steel columns are seen falling. I know that they are interior box columns which surround the core. Nto "core columns".

Dave

 

[chipmunk stew]

At this point I'm not sure what I believe:

A: Christophera is simply a troll trying to see how long he can string this thing on just for laughs

or

B: He really is so completely deluded that he belives what he says.

I really hope it's option A because for it to be otherwise is truely too depressing and pathetic to contemplate.

Apparently he's been doing this for like five years or something. Don't you think the joke would get old? Especially if no one else is laughing?

I'm afraid it's B.

 

[Architect]

Told you



Dave

Sigh.....you were right, m8.

I'd love to know why he thinks you'd need a concrete core and inner steel columns.

Well, okay, I wouldn't.

 

[Bell]

Sigh.....you were right, m8.

I'd love to know why he thinks you'd need a concrete core and inner steel columns.

Well, okay, I wouldn't.

Because else his picture which shows something standing up within the cloud of debris can't be labeled as a concrete core.

 

[Architect]

Don't you mean Invisicrete tm ?

 

[Bell]

Don't you mean Invisicrete tm ?

Yes! Exactly!

I was in the WTC three months prior to 9/11 and have seen the Invicicrete my self. Or actualy, I didn't see it, because... ehm... it was invicible.

 

[Architect]

Yes! Exactly!

I was in the WTC three months prior to 9/11 and have seen the Invicicrete my self. Or actualy, I didn't see it, because... ehm... it was invicible.

Didn't notice anybody planting, like, tonnes and tonnes of invisible explosive did you?

 

[Mr. Skinny]

Sigh.....you were right, m8.

I'd love to know why he thinks you'd need a concrete core and inner steel columns.

Well, okay, I wouldn't.

Always wondered that myself, Architect.

And no, I don't want to hear his explaination either.

 

[Bell]

Didn't notice anybody planting, like, tonnes and tonnes of invisible explosive did you?

The only oddity I noticed at the WTC was that me and my father were able to get into a turbo elevator to the 110th floor, even though the liftshafts were hermetical sealed.