Alareth
Philosopher
More trouble in LC paradise. JohnDoe takes his research and goes home.
- Thread starter LashL
- Start date
Well I just registered yet again at the JDX forum, and tried to make this post ->
------------
Tsk tsk John, I wasn't being unprofessional, I merely disagreed with you.
I'm not required to agree with you, and on many things I do not.
As I clearly mentioned in my other posts, the method I used to calculate the flight path does not require any barometric correction.
We know the 757 hit the Pentagon.
We know the elevation of the impact point.
We know the angle of the flight path.
We know the distance and elevation of the street lights.
And if you do some simple calculations it's clear that the 757 could very easily hit all the poles it is known to have done.
So there ya go, a post that's totally professional and straight to the point.
You can't reasonably ban me for that.
Billzilla.
----------
But the forum software may genuinely be playing so I can't post it yet. It's to go into the Billzilla Challenge thread.
------------
Tsk tsk John, I wasn't being unprofessional, I merely disagreed with you.
I'm not required to agree with you, and on many things I do not.
As I clearly mentioned in my other posts, the method I used to calculate the flight path does not require any barometric correction.
We know the 757 hit the Pentagon.
We know the elevation of the impact point.
We know the angle of the flight path.
We know the distance and elevation of the street lights.
And if you do some simple calculations it's clear that the 757 could very easily hit all the poles it is known to have done.
So there ya go, a post that's totally professional and straight to the point.
You can't reasonably ban me for that.
Billzilla.
----------
But the forum software may genuinely be playing so I can't post it yet. It's to go into the Billzilla Challenge thread.
Also on JDX's Youtube video thingy he says, "3500-6000 fpm are not abnormal for jets. Especially with an Air Data Computer."
That is totally incorrect.
Normal decent rates are more like 1,500fpm to maybe 3,000fpm.
6,000fpm is close to what you get with an emergency decent. There's no doubt many other errors, but that's a quick one I spotted.
That is totally incorrect.
Normal decent rates are more like 1,500fpm to maybe 3,000fpm.
6,000fpm is close to what you get with an emergency decent. There's no doubt many other errors, but that's a quick one I spotted.
Okay, yet again he proves what a little Hitler he is.
He's banned me yet again (not for long) and completely ignored my logical and correct explaination as to the flight path.
He's still carrying on about pressure corrections and such, which are not needed and indeed misleading.
He's banned me yet again (not for long) and completely ignored my logical and correct explaination as to the flight path.
He's still carrying on about pressure corrections and such, which are not needed and indeed misleading.
DavidJames
Penultimate Amazing
Here is the link I use.
http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?act=idx
He claims there are other pilots but there isn't much action at all.
You may want to mention to JDX that thing about wings, I want to make sure he is up on the latest
he has a new site here too:
http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/
http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/
Here is the link I use.
(edited out)
He claims there are other pilots but there isn't much action at all.
You may want to mention to JDX that thing about wings, I want to make sure he is up on the latest
I'll check it out... let's see...
Idiots for Truth said:
Yes, but, how many of those are Billzilla?
DavidJames
Penultimate Amazing
I believe both sites are the same.
Yeah JDX is big into claiming he's not making claims, a claim which is BS, like most of the nonsense he spews.
Love the headline:
Breaking News: Boeing Refuses to Decode Additional FDR Data due to "Corporate Relationships".
....which points here: http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=11159
D'oh Boy after banning 16 dissenters before breakfast said:
DavidJames
Penultimate Amazing
By "Boeing", he means, some guy that someone knows someone who works at Boeing who was sent an email asking them to do it.Love the headline:
Breaking News: Boeing Refuses to Decode Additional FDR Data due to "Corporate Relationships".
....which points here: http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=11159
I just signed up there, using the name RussellCasse, as a nod to
forums.randi.org/imagehosting/36174504033371510.jpg
(can't link yet)
Since aledged pilot JohnD'oh is monitoring this forum, I wonder if I get banned even before I post anything?
forums.randi.org/imagehosting/36174504033371510.jpg
(can't link yet)
Since aledged pilot JohnD'oh is monitoring this forum, I wonder if I get banned even before I post anything?
Last edited:
That was fast. Nice work Lil' Jon, oh and
Who is your MD-88 Pilot for Truth anyways? It cant be Glen (ok you got me - the morons at st911.org spelled his name wrong. He is a pilot. I stand corrected.)
Stellafane
Village Idiot.
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2006
- Messages
- 8,368
Good work, JDX. Now here's one for you: Starting in a little while, the next 10 accounts that register at your site will all be my socks. I won't do it all at once though; I'll space them out a little so you can't really be sure they're all me. Think you can ban them all before I get a few posts in about how you're either a total fake, or you belong in Guinness as the world's youngest commercial pilot ever (at the precocious age of 6)?
ETA: [Actually, I'm going to do no such thing. Just wondering if JDX would ban someone sight-unseen simply because they might be a troll.]
Last edited:
DavidJames
Penultimate Amazing
Hey johndoex, a couple of questions for you.
1. Any luck finding a job?
2. Since you aren't working, are you sponging off your parents or the government?
1. Any luck finding a job?
2. Since you aren't working, are you sponging off your parents or the government?
WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
JDX makes an attempt to address hysteresis error here. Noy being a pilot, I do however find some curious analysis going on here. First, he calculates the descent rate per minute using 1 sec. intervals in altimeter readings, doesn't seem a good way to go about it to me. He then claims this rate (roughly 4000 feet per minute) is normal, and would only have a negligible effect on hysteresis error. Does the jack-booted fascist idiot unemployed looser have a point?
Did I just poison the well?
Did I just poison the well?
He's loosing it, getting paranoid. That's why he is keeping an eye on this forum. I just hope the voices in his head are not gonna send him onto some devine mission...
JDX makes an attempt to address hysteresis error here. Noy being a pilot, I do however find some curious analysis going on here. First, he calculates the descent rate per minute using 1 sec. intervals in altimeter readings, doesn't seem a good way to go about it to me. He then claims this rate (roughly 4000 feet per minute) is normal, and would only have a negligible effect on hysteresis error. Does the jack-booted fascist idiot unemployed looser have a point?
Did I just poison the well?
Well, its probably something Bill can address. I know that Boeings, like the 757, have what are called IVSIs which stands for Instantaneous Vertical Speed Indicators. They remove the lag in pressure that happens in quick ascents/descents for an accurate indication. I do not think that the FDR takes IVSI samples in any event.
I can tell you that 4000-6000 fpm descents are not normal and would exacerbate any lag/error. Whether its possible that that error could be 450 ft - or - 5 seconds, I cant answer and I suspect the NTSB cant either..