• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11 was 'inside job'

Gravy said:
It's not easy to get a sense of scale, though, without knowing how large that motor or steel plate are.
Click to expand...
Actually, there is a yardstick in the pic. That steel plate is a common enough item - it's walkway sheeting. The bumps would typically be around and inch and a half long, I suspect.

I've tried doing a cursory search for the plating, but have not found anything so far (lack of time). The material could be aluminium, but is most probably steel.

That would make that motor/alternator thingy in front maybe a foot long? <thumbsuck>
 
Gravy said:
He chose this one:
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/879045001ee78db7b.jpg[/qimg]​
Click to expand...
OMG! The rock on the right side of the photo (at the same vertical as the motor) looks like a screaming human head! Someone needs to notify icantakepicturesofdemons immediately!
 
Long ago, in another thread, I used the original report to show that, even if it were completely pulvarized into dust, the CTers claims about the energy required were off by a factor of about 8 because they used a wrong average particle size. Taking that into account, I concluded there was enough energy to pulverize everything even if it were completely destroyed.

Which it of course wasn't
 
OK, I don't usually play the "what are your credentials" game, but in this case, the article brings it up, not me:

Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries.
Click to expand...

By what measures are these "top" professors and "leading" scientists?

What the heck makes a "top" professor in the first place? I can get a good handle on "leading scientists" (publication record, funding support (indicating peer recognition), national awards), but I don't know that any of these stand out in those regards, as would be expected for a "leader." And I have no idea what a top professor is. My best guess is that it would be a professor at a top university. The closest I can see is Jones at BYU, but that's not anywhere near the very top.
 
pgwenthold said:
OK, I don't usually play the "what are your credentials" game, but in this case, the article brings it up, not me:



By what measures are these "top" professors and "leading" scientists?

What the heck makes a "top" professor in the first place? I can get a good handle on "leading scientists" (publication record, funding support (indicating peer recognition), national awards), but I don't know that any of these stand out in those regards, as would be expected for a "leader." And I have no idea what a top professor is. My best guess is that it would be a professor at a top university. The closest I can see is Jones at BYU, but that's not anywhere near the very top.
Click to expand...

No, you misunderstand.

They mean top professors. You know, professors who study those little spinning children's toys. And leading scientists, as in asking leading questions of nature and formulating biased theories.

:D
 
Beerina said:
Well in excess of a hundred thousand tons comes careening downward, heavy girders and big blocks by the thousands, bumping and grinding each other for 1000 feet, and he can't grasp that? Just a small fraction needs to be pulverized to create that dust cloud.
Click to expand...
I think a lot of CTers look at the videos of the towers collapsing and assume the large amount of dust is merely from the concrete. I don't think any of them take into consideration the THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of sheets of drywall that must have been in the towers. Anyone who's worked with the stuff can tell you that you'll get a fair amount of dust simply from dropping a small chunk of it from only a few feet up. Imagine how much dust will result from thousands of sheets being crushed by tons and tons of steel and concrete falling at the Speed of Gravity™.
 
CurtC said:
OMG! The rock on the right side of the photo (at the same vertical as the motor) looks like a screaming human head! Someone needs to notify icantakepicturesofdemons immediately!
Click to expand...
I just noticed that too...
 
I saw the Pompeii stuff in Dallas first, while in highschool. I will never forget that look. I saw it too first time, in that pic. Nice to see others see the clouds in life like me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom