Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gravy, that is a good collection of flight 93 witness accounts. Have you posted that in Killtown's "smoke plume" thread? These accounts would be impossible to reconcile with his accusations of fakery.
Yes, I gathered them specifically because Killtown dared me to show eyewitness reports of the plume. When I posted them on that thread and repeatedly asked him if these people were lying, he wouldn't respond.
 
Gravy, that is a good collection of flight 93 witness accounts. Have you posted that in Killtown's "smoke plume" thread? These accounts would be impossible to reconcile with his accusations of fakery.

Gravy posted those links for Killtown on many occasions. Not sure what Killtowns response was, he probably just ignored them.....like he does everything that destroys his idiotic claims.
 
Gravy posted those links for Killtown on many occasions. Not sure what Killtowns response was, he probably just ignored them.....like he does everything that destroys his idiotic claims.

I'll second that. Not only did he not respond when Gravy posted them, but when asked (very politely) repeatedly by me (yea, even made me delurk) and many others to make a comment, any comment, on the excellent information Gravy posted, the silence was deafening.
 
Yes, I gathered them specifically because Killtown dared me to show eyewitness reports of the plume. When I posted them on that thread and repeatedly asked him if these people were lying, he wouldn't respond.
Hmm, it would be a shame if someone copied all that and posted it in his "smoke plume" thread over at the LC Forum.
 
http://www.rense.com/general33/legal.htm
The "Bressler Report" is an interesting read, it's not that I don't like to read or that I am too lazy to invest the time to investigate these reports "properly".. I've read and seen enough to accept reality for what it is.
http://www.dorway.com/bressler.html

1977 ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bovine_somatotropin
I understand that you are having some trouble questioning the "official" reports, but if you spend a little bit of time looking at the facts contained on the "organicconsumers" page that explains the TRUE history of MONSANTO, then you can go back to the wiki definition of r(BGH) and swallow the fact that the science giant of the world is in fact lying.

Ah! So ALL scientists are evil bastards ? Scientists don't become scientists to understand how stuff workstm, but to poison the human world ? What the hell are you saying, here ?

Make sure you scroll down to the bottom left hand side of that page for some lovely mug shots. :jaw-dropp
And there is about two or three dozen more that I can list for you that have walked through the "revolving door" that have played an important part in our genetic rape... but they eat a little further down the line.
lemme know if your interested, I can rattle that shiite off like a "professional".

You DO know that food doesn't change your DNA, right ?

If I may go out on a limb, I'll presume you're a person without actual expertise, angry at how other, smarter people actually manage to make a life for themselves and be more successful, economically.

Everything is not derived from natural stuff anymore.

REALLY? So we can make molecules out of thin air ?

http://health.centreforce.com/health/laetrile.html

"It was even more strongly claimed that when one eats about 7 apricot seeds per day they can never develop cancer, just as one can never get scurvy if they have an orange every day, or pellagra if they have some B vitamins every day.

And eating shark genitalia makes you a sex machine. Gosh, I hate alternative crap.

If it's that easy, sub, it should be a breeze to double-blind test this one. Wanna have a go at it ?

Do you have an image of a 757 on approach to the pentagon before it crashed ? Didn't that plane make a U-turn and show up on three or four other closed circuit cameras that were swiftly collected by the "men in black" ? Where are they?

They only exist in your head. The Pentagon had surveillance cameras for its parking lot. Why would you want those cameras to follow an approaching plane is beyond me.


Do you DENY that explosions can be the result of things that aren't explosives ?

Well, maybe I AM qualified to interpret them,

Then present your credentials.

Well maybe they can get ahold of that high speed RECYCLING machine and send it on down to N.O... the least FEMA could let them do is borrow it dontcha think?!

Who to the what, now ? You don't think they just feed the steel to sharks, do you ?

And as far as the planes being taken away, it doesn't look like there was enough left of flight 93 to put in a wheel-barrow.

You haven't seen the same images I have. Personally, I'd have gone without the charred bodies.

My double blind test machine is on the fritz, but since you still can't see how most of this puzzle fits together maybe it will help if you invest the time to read the links and analyze the information from the only blog I've ever written, and you can come up with a reply to that "overall picture".

Yes, assembling puzzles is fun, but your "overall picture" looks like this:

SBI-MishMash.jpg


My little sister told me recently that most people are unable to understand that "expression" because either they knew me previously and it was somewhat foreign coming from me, or they just didn't know how to respond because they couldn't accept the fact that we have been intentionally misled, so blatantly.

Misled by who ? It's not like I trust M. Bush.

I spent three months in federal custody and am currently awaiting trial for discussing the solution to the problems in that blog ONCE on the telephone.It's a little bit "heated" and I guess you could say I've matured since then.

No. I don't suppose I could.

Thanks, last time I checked Canada and the UK were both still considered as being on EARTH.

You have a very short memory. You said: "We ARE all ONE, and in this country, we are not far from suffocating ourselves."

Clearly, people from other countries are not adressed by this assertion.

Anybody got a picture or written explanation for why the structural integrity of this building failed in the center of the structure?

Why shouldn't it ?

Do you think the pharmacutical companies would allow something a simple as B-17 to put a dent in their Trillion dollar game of "medical monopoly" ?

If they can market it ? Sure.

Why can't you buy raw apricot seeds in this country?

You can, here.

Other than Posilac, the herbicides pesticides and fertilizer monopoly that exist in this country effects us all on a worldwide scale. There are 4 or 5 "Gene Giants" in the world and they have all chosen to "treat" the population of the world with the same recipe.
There are a few countries that do not permit (GE) food or seeds.

Gotta hate those resilient, nutritious and fertile genetically-engineered food, as opposed to the far less-reliable, "natural" foods.

I don't claim to KNOW anything friend.

Even about cancer and the medical "monopoly" ?

And I don't respect the majority of the people who are in charge of making decisions in this country, especially the "experts". As a matter of fact, I've found them to be VERY misleading.

Why ? Doesn't appeal to your "common sense" ?

And there hasn't been one fanatical terrorist to be found in this country since then eventho' the American war machine is in their home land destroying and taking the lives of a few hundred thousand innocent women and children.

Are... are you supporting the terrorists ?
 
Last edited:
Terrific New Debunker!

I'm just staggered by this site, called Internet Detectives. It's right up there with 9-11 Myths, Gravy's Guide, and Debunking 9-11. Well-written, solid analysis, links to data... terrific job. I've invited the site creator to join us over here.
 
Here is something that I do not understand; perhaps someone could clear it up for me?
How could it BOTH be obvious that
(a) in the case of WTC1 and WTC2, the collapse was going to continue all the way down once one (or perhaps a couple) of floors were destroyed, and
(b) point 2 above?

I mean...it would then make sense with such buildings to blow up just one or two floors to perform a CD, would it not?

Let it be clear for you: there were already explosions! Remember those planes slamming in these buildings?
 
I'm just staggered by this site, called Internet Detectives. It's right up there with 9-11 Myths, Gravy's Guide, and Debunking 9-11. Well-written, solid analysis, links to data... terrific job. I've invited the site creator to join us over here.

I loved this line:

Attempting to be prepared for a farfetched situation doesn't indicate an intention to create the situation. Do you put on your seatbelt and drive off a cliff?

:D
 
Submersible does have a point about the apricot seeds. If you eat a large quantity of them you will never develop cancer - because the cyanide in the seeds will kill you long before cancer develops.

Similarly, you will not die of cancer if you get a bullet shot through your head... but most of you probably understand that is hardly a good preventative measure.
 
Wow - that is a terrific site indeed!
Hi LL I read most of your 15 rounds with Jondoex at the CN. Shame you got banned.

JDX has never flown a plane, Billzilla showed that over at LC. JDX just doesnt have the confidence that pilots have.
 
Attempting to be prepared for a farfetched situation doesn't indicate an intention to create the situation. Do you put on your seatbelt and drive off a cliff?

That line turned up at the LC forums:

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=12298&st=30

For those who can't / don't want to go there, the thread concerns a bunch of speculation on "something big" happening on 7 Sept 06 based on:

* a terrorism emergency preparedness drill scheduled for that day
* a paranoid article about a coming "nuclear false flag" operation
* bizarre numerology that's being taken far too seriously
* stock trade records

Anyway, the apropriately-named site admin "CrazyBlade" wins the Utterly-Oblivious-To-The-Obvious Award by replying with:

And you know its a far-fetched situation how??

/upwardpointingsmiley
 
At the 35:20 point or so, Mr. Montablan (I dont know his real claim) claims that ALL of the events you see in the movie "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" atually took place...

quite entertaining...like watching a flie with its wings cut off....i know..sick...but you know I am right...

TAM
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom