• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I retract my previous post. This thread is interesting again:

Christophera said:
Uh, ................ I ask for accountability and I get the above. Reason not available, hmm, ........... must be OUT TO LUNCH! The laws of conservation of energy deny you are reasonable.


Try some emotional reasoning.
Click to expand...

Oh THAT'S what we are forgetting! Quickly everyone, be sure to factor emotions into your physics calculations!

How about you try reasonable emotions?


Your children will suffer because you cannot use truth to aid in the protection of their lives, their futures.
Click to expand...

I don't plan on having kids. Thanks.

A chance of harmony and sustainability. peace and strenght based in knowledge. Your race will suffer becaue your vision does not include a sense of justice, fairness and understanding of our natures.
Click to expand...

My race? Which race would that be?

My sense of justice must be all out of whack. I like to blame the people who actually caused 9/11.

Your lack of acceptance will cause your mis decision and demise for those you love in all ways in your failure to use truth.
Click to expand...

My grammar and spelling skills suck...no doubt. Oh the other hand, I still have to laugh at this.

Mankind did not find its way down the better path it has walked at times and in ways by using your gifts of communication that you use in the ways you are now using them.

Knowledge and power serve love, because love protects life.
Click to expand...

What in the blue hell are you talking about?


Dumbsh#ts.

Whattsa' matta w'dat? Are your children going to complain?
Click to expand...

Assuming Chris is not a troll:

Don't ban him. He is trying to martyr himself. Ironic really.
 
Stellafane said:
Agreed...because, Chris my man, you somehow managed to post some 660+ times without actually making any "solid inquiries."
Click to expand...

Delete "solid", add "competent and understandable".

As far as I can gather, Chris believes that

(a) The core was concrete, in direct contrast to the links he posts

(b) That the rebar was C4 coated, in the complete absence of any substantive evidence that such material was used.

(c) That the building was exploded (with the C4) but the rebar somehow stood on it's own thereafter.

ad infinitum.

Nuts.
 
Architect said:
1. What made you think that they analytically planned to collapse it they way they did? Do not confuse happy (for them) chance with a deliberate plan.

2. They weren't plastic knives, Einsteen, and well you know it. The reports just said knives, American security sources said "boxcutters", however "boxcutters" are better known to the rest of the world as Stanley knives and have a whole track record in serious attacks in my country.
Click to expand...

1. I mean why not taking a nuclear reactor or something like that, if nobody knows what would happen they also wouldn't know. With the knowlegde that you only will kill a few people on the floor of impact why would you do it? If someone's purpose is to kill as many people as possible you wouldn't hit the WTC only to show that you are able to hijack a plane and show what you can do as a kind of status, you would hit a target to kill as many people as possible. They had their lucky day, another near zero chance to add to the product of chances, this does not proof that they had that knowledge, they couldn't have that but it's at least suspicious that they choose this target

2. Ok Archie, this was not meant to be seriously, it just popped in my mint and I added it
 
Christophera said:
Try some emotional reasoning
Click to expand...

Ok Chris, whatever you say.

Please, please, please. Please stop going on about the concrete cores, nobody believes you, even the guys across at LC don't believe you. So please. Please for the love of god and Jesus and all things sacred stop going on about them. Please.....please.... please.

Is that emotional enough for you?
 
Last edited:
Einsteen...

I believe there is a video where Osama is talking to some of his fellow Al-Qeada friends, and in the convo they admit they were SURPRISED, but pleased when the towers actually collapsed. If they were SURPRISED it happened, I doubt they planned it.

TAM
 
stateofgrace said:
Ok Chris, whatever you say.

Please, please, please. Please stop going on about the concrete cores, nobody believes you, even the guys across at LC don't believe you. So please. Please for the love of god and Jesus and all things sacred stop going on about them. Please.....please.... please.

Is that emotional enough for you?
Click to expand...

Very good! But you forgot, "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!1111elevenoneone!!!"

;)
 
stateofgrace said:
Ok Chris, whatever you say.

Please, please, please. Please stop going on about the concrete cores, nobody believes you, even the guys across at LC don't believe you. So please. Please for the love of god and Jesus and all things sacred stop going on about them. Please.....please.... please.

Is that emotional enough for you?
Click to expand...

*Weeps on stateofgrace's shoulder*

He's hurt so many people!! :cry1
 
T.A.M. said:
Einsteen...

I believe there is a video where Osama is talking to some of his fellow Al-Qeada friends, and in the convo they admit they were SURPRISED, but pleased when the towers actually collapsed. If they were SURPRISED it happened, I doubt they planned it.

TAM
Click to expand...

Is that this Osama

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpAB8vn5VXo

Even Stevie Wonder sees that's a different man, and I disagree with the debunking in which Gravy shows another frame. He got me of course with those two buildings.. but this is something different, if quality decreases information is lost and things might look the same, here it even doesn't look the same after loss of information...
 
watch the whole video. There are other videos where is face is a little more "pudgy" or "fat" which is the main complaint CTers have with it. They compare other pictures of him from other footage, to this footage.

Even better, is watch the martyr will video tapes of the hijackers..the ones that supposedly don't exist.

TAM
 
einsteen said:
If someone's purpose is to kill as many people as possible you wouldn't hit the WTC only to show that you are able to hijack a plane and show what you can do as a kind of status, you would hit a target to kill as many people as possible. They had their lucky day, another near zero chance to add to the product of chances, this does not proof that they had that knowledge, they couldn't have that but it's at least suspicious that they choose this target
Click to expand...

You got it all wrong. Not only did they want to kill and create as much damage as possible, Al Qaeda also targeted these sites for their symbolical value:

The WTC is the symbol of the American economic superpower
The Pentagon is the symbol of US military strength
The Capitol or the White House (I don't recall which one was the actual target) are the symbols of democracy.
 
I hope I got it wrong, I hope. I'll read the tread later because I have to sleep, is there a raw version somewhere, then the virtualdub filters can do some work..;)
 
Christophera said:
Uh, ................ I ask for accountability and I get the above. Reason not available, hmm, ........... must be OUT TO LUNCH! The laws of conservation of energy deny you are reasonable.


Try some emotional reasoning.


Your children will suffer because you cannot use truth to aid in the protection of their lives, their futures. A chance of harmony and sustainability. peace and strenght based in knowledge. Your race will suffer becaue your vision does not include a sense of justice, fairness and understanding of our natures. Your lack of acceptance will cause your mis decision and demise for those you love in all ways in your failure to use truth.

Mankind did not find its way down the better path it has walked at times and in ways by using your gifts of communication that you use in the ways you are now using them.

Knowledge and power serve love, because love protects life.









Dumbsh#ts.

Whattsa' matta w'dat? Are your children going to complain?
Click to expand...

[modp]Christophera, you are continuously derailing the thread with unrelated matters. Please stay focused on the subject of discussion.[/modp]
 
I don't follow these threads, but I thought some might want to know that there is a show on (US) PBS right now about the collapse of the towers.
 
You OwnThe Garbage of Denial

Architect said:
Delete "solid", add "competent and understandable".

As far as I can gather, Chris believes that

(a) The core was concrete, in direct contrast to the links he posts

(b) That the rebar was C4 coated, in the complete absence of any substantive evidence that such material was used.

(c) That the building was exploded (with the C4) but the rebar somehow stood on it's own thereafter.

ad infinitum.

Nuts.
Click to expand...

We have 2 roles dominating this thread in the denial crew, we have the garbage men, and the deniers. When the deniers fail to support their denial with reason, they count on the garbage men to bury the reasonable explanations of the issue with loads of crap.

Then later they all complain about how much crap there is and want the promoter of truth to dig trough all the crap to find the reasonable explanation that was certainly read by everyone of the crew but since they have no use for the truth they are unreasonably selective with evidence to enable denial and don't care about the explanation anyway so don't bother explaining anything at all.


 
Patricio Elicer said:
[modp]Christophera, you are continuously derailing the thread with unrelated matters. Please stay focused on the subject of discussion.[/modp]
Click to expand...
Therein lies the rub, no? How can one stay focused upon that which is only a mirage?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom