• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
KingMerv00 said:
Not always. We still talk to you.



I was referring to the debris that was ejected during the collapse.

1) WTC starts to collapse. Debris ejected from the floors due to air pressure.

2) Debris hits the ground well before the collapse is complete.

Therefore the builiding did collapse at free fall speed.


I guess you don't object to the order of the WTC's collapse anymore since you didn't address it?
Click to expand...

Since we cannot see when the building is actually destroyed to the ground (no collapse involved) the issue of rate of fall is moot. The towers fell way too fast.

I guess you missed my analysis of the sequence of the towers falling here where the sequence is shown to make the official story implausible.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1207667

and you also missed this regarding WTC 3 falling first.

Christophera said:
How lame, attempting to equate time to load. If there were 5 years difference in the falls, maybe.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
Since we cannot see when the building is actually destroyed to the ground (no collapse involved) the issue of rate of fall is moot. The towers fell way too fast.

I guess you missed my analysis of the sequence of the towers falling here where the sequence is shown to make the official story implausible.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1207667

and you also missed this regarding WTC 3 falling first.
Click to expand...

"Dear Christophera,

You're wrong.

Love,
The Internet"
 
What Kind Of American Will Ignore Laws & The Constitution?

T.A.M. said:
I think he is doing the who Bukakke thing....you know...with stupid.

I guess this explains your perceptional problem as you do not actually do anything requiring a test of rights and freedoms, or reason and evidence and so assume everyone sees things the same as you do without reasoning or evidence.

So what do you suggest we do to "test" rights and freedoms?
So what do you suggeste we do to "test" reason or evidence?
I assume noone thinks the way I do. I doubt KingMerv does either.
Click to expand...

We file lawsuits against government at any level to see if courts will recognize, follow and uphold laws. We have a right to redress grievances against government, it is a second way to control our government aside from democratic/legislative action.

When the populations are deceived, un informed, mis informed, it is the only way to correct aberrant governmental action/neglect or incompetence. It is our right and duty to do so, if we are competent, aware Americans.

Doing so with competent evidence tests the courts ability to reason, or it test the evidence.

Have you filed a lawsuit against aberrant government since 2001? I'm on my 5th and I can tell you, we've all but lost our rights and our freedom is next. Unless we can observe simple truths without bias ourselves, and unify around them in redress.
 
NIST has concluded that the rest of the building, below the floors of impact offered virtually no resistence, due to the overwhelming accelerated momentum of the falling floors above.

Given the majority of the building fell at "close" to Free-Fall Speed, and given the building offered "Little" in terms of resistance, I'd say they fell at just about the right speed...namely a little longer than free fall...lol
 
Christophera said:
I guess this explains your perceptional problem as you do not actually do anything requiring a test of rights and freedoms, or reason and evidence and so assume everyone sees things the same as you do without reasoning or evidence.
Click to expand...

Pardalis said:
What the hell does that mean? :confused:

I think Christophera has changed gear, from "insane" to "even-more-insane".
Click to expand...

Glad you stopped trying to pretend you are intelligent.
 
Last edited:
T.A.M. said:
The main portions of the towers fell at "Near" free fall speeds. NIST has addressed questions around this. The accelerated momentum of the top portion on each tower was powerful/extreme enough to overcome what little resistence would be offered by the structure below it. The steel of each floor was designed to hold a static load of the floors above, not a dynamic one.

As for why the 2nd hit tower fell first...yes it was that it was hit lower, but also it was hit more into a corner, causing assymetrical load changes on the area of impact in comparison to the load at the impact area for the 1st building.
Click to expand...

If assymetry is the cause of an early fall, then why did the body of WTC 2 fall symmetrically east instead of more south than east towards the damaged corner??
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
We file lawsuits against government at any level to see if courts will recognize, follow and uphold laws. We have a right to redress grievances against government, it is a second way to control our government aside from democratic/legislative action.

When the populations are deceived, un informed, mis informed, it is the only way to correct aberrant governmental action/neglect or incompetence. It is our right and duty to do so, if we are competent, aware Americans.

Doing so with competent evidence tests the courts ability to reason, or it test the evidence.

Have you filed a lawsuit against aberrant government since 2001? I'm on my 5th and I can tell you, we've all but lost our rights and our freedom is next. Unless we can observe simple truths without bias ourselves, and unify around them in redress.
Click to expand...

Bolding and Italics my emphasis...

Maybe when someone here finds some Competent Evidence that refutes the Official Story, than they will file such a suit...I haven't seen any...
 
Christophera said:
We file lawsuits against government at any level to see if courts will recognize, follow and uphold laws. We have a right to redress grievances against government, it is a second way to control our government aside from democratic/legislative action.

When the populations are deceived, un informed, mis informed, it is the only way to correct aberrant governmental action/neglect or incompetence. It is our right and duty to do so, if we are competent, aware Americans.

Doing so with competent evidence tests the courts ability to reason, or it test the evidence.

Have you filed a lawsuit against aberrant government since 2001? I'm on my 5th and I can tell you, we've all but lost our rights and our freedom is next. Unless we can observe simple truths without bias ourselves, and unify around them in redress.
Click to expand...
May I ask the nature of your five lawsuits against "aberrant government"?

ETA: Maybe I mis-read. You're on your 5th what?, Chris.
 
I just want to mention that Christophera did the exact same thing for years at DU that he is doing here now - that is, posting the same vague photographs over and over and over and over and over again in every thread he was on while insisting upon the existence of a concrete core, something that not another single person in the world has ever seen or believes; yapping about a "documentary" that not another person in the world has ever heard of or seen; using the same rude and insulting language to accuse everyone else of being deceptive, dishonest, lacking integrity, etc., as a smokescreen to avoid ever offering proof of anything he posts, etc. - until he finally got banned as he grew ever more shrill and abusive.

Just so you know.

(Cross posted to the other thread where christophera is currently insulting members)
 
Christophera has discovered a magical new invention, he can make floor beams change into 3 inch rebarb by simply changing the resolution of the picture.
 
LashL said:
I just want to mention that Christophera did the exact same thing for years at DU that he is doing here now - that is, posting the same vague photographs over and over and over and over and over again in every thread he was on while insisting upon the existence of a concrete core, something that not another single person in the world has ever seen or believes;
Click to expand...

Uh huh, but you are so wrong. Distorting the truth. DU is lame, I shined it on for a year or more until I had worked my way through other sites like Let's Roll. This site is even lamer.

Many people know the concrete core was the core of the towers. They are not CT'ers either.

http://www.unc.edu/courses/2001fall/plan/006e/001/engineering/index.html

http://www.ussartf.org/world_trade_center_disaster.htm

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/trusstheory.html

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?p=2197378
#925
Old 07-23-2006, 11:28 AM

http://www.salwen.com/wtc/

http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/wtc/page3.html

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3069641/

http://www.didyouknow.org/terrorism.htm

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:..."&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=117&client=firefox-a

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:..."&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=130&client=firefox-a

http://www.downingjcr.co.uk/forum/t...71&PHPSESSID=7939780fe0b4d1e28139abdc619ae367

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0512/S00082.htm

http://membres.lycos.fr/jcviel/BTS/sujets/2002batiment.htm

http://www.delta.tudelft.nl/archief/j33/n27/3664
 
Christophera said:
Wow, you really know what is important.

Too bad you can't explain why none of the 47 supposed steel core columns are never seen when they should be.


Too bad merv has no nerv and can't answer
Click to expand...

Who the [rule 8] is Merv and what has he got to do with your evasion of simple questions?

BTW why did you lie on the other site?

Do you lie often or just on the internet?

Do you think that by evading the questions it increases your credibility?

Do you think ignoring the credible and easily confirmed evidence that we provided to you, that shows your interpretaions of photos taken from a great distance are wrong, somehow magically makes you right?

Since you have no credibility here (as a proven liar among other things), and have no interest in engaging in an honest discussion (see above) why do you continue to post here?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom