• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Answer the question you coward; you said they used custom rebar on the WTC towers. Provide evidence for this or retract your claim that it was custom rebar.

Answer the question you coward; you said there were steel core columns in the core of the tower, provide evidence for this or retract your claim that the core was comprised of multiple steel core columns.

 
Peabody's Bone

Mr. Brown:

- What are your plans for presenting your evidence to one or more scientific journals?
- Will you apologize for your unprovoked attack on me?
- Will you retract the post you claim to be from Leslie E. Robertson?
- What "distortions" of mine are "visible?" Please provide quotes.

-I will be publishing my theories on toilet paper and offering 100 roll boxes at discount to universities around the globe.

-Will you apologize for yours on me? Recall, I have evidence, you do not.

-Robertson? Heh, ......... I'll leave that to the reader and advise them that it was posted on April 1, 2006 here,

http://forum.physorg.com/Basic-Physics_3108-9400.html

Christophera is correct in stating that the Twin Towers were constructed with a concrete core. Although in my original design the core was to be a steel framed one that decision was overridden by Minoru Yamasaki the architect.

That core should have resisted the airplane impacts AND the fires. I have said nothing for four and a half years but can remain silent no longer. My belief is that only explosives could have caused WTC 1 & WTC 2 to collapse the way they did on September 11, 2001.

Leslie E. Robertson
Director Leslie E. Robertson Associates, R.L.L.P. and lead engineer of the World Trade Center




-I shall have to go find a few of your distortions and return.
 
What sick, twisted loser gets joy out of spouting inane CTs? Why fabricate a quote from Leslie Robertson if the other evidence is so strong?

Christophera, 3,000 people died on 9/11. Have you no shame? Is your life so worthless that you are forced to sully the memory of the victims?
 
Aprils Fools Day Roberson Message No Joke

I think it is Robertson. On the morning of April 1, I saw that and almost immediately posted somehing like "See, I told you so!. Robertson himself is coming out now." But I didn't because I thought it was a trap set by the disinfos in that thread. After looking at it over and over, something about it seems real.

He has got to be one of the most avid 9-11 lurkers of all. I mean if you bullt those towers and that happened to them, would you want to know the truth? if you knew or suspected the truth would you try and find a safe way for yourself to get it out?
If some one like my self was arguing day in and day out proving what you know to be true, would you want to help? Then be torn between that and the potential risk to yourself and so use an ambigous moment like April fools day to give the truth to someone in away that protected you?


What sick, twisted loser gets joy out of spouting inane CTs? Why fabricate a quote from Leslie Robertson if the other evidence is so strong?

Christophera, 3,000 people died on 9/11. Have you no shame? Is your life so worthless that you are forced to sully the memory of the victims?


But I did not fabricate it. And I don't post it often because I don't know who it is that posted it originally, and then there's always some one such as yourself that will assume I made it myself and posted it, ........ and there is so much good evidence so i don't need to, but these folks here don't use evidence or reason, so what's up with you thinking I'm wrong for pulling, what is at least a good joke on me by somebody unknown, out of the hat just for yuk's to see how it is taken by disinfos here.

I fabricate nothing and use only what is there, what is given (or I might take), reasonably and faithfully to the purpose of reason. Everything I do is honoring their memory and using what their deaths might mean to protect the live of the ones they loved, who loved them, from ever knowing anything like this again.

You haven't explained near free fall and pulverizaton, ....... I have. That protects us all.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html
 
I fabricate nothing and use only what is there, what is given (or I might take), reasonably and faithfully to the purpose of reason. Everything I do is honoring their memory and using what their deaths might mean to protect the live of the ones they loved, who loved them, from ever knowing anything like this again.


English is not your native language is it?

Could this all be a mistranslation of the word "concrete"?

-Andrew
 
-I'll leave that to the reader and advise them that it was posted on April 1, 2006 here,

http://forum.physorg.com/Basic-Physics_3108-9400.html

Christophera is correct in stating that the Twin Towers were constructed with a concrete core. Although in my original design the core was to be a steel framed one that decision was overridden by Minoru Yamasaki the architect.

That core should have resisted the airplane impacts AND the fires. I have said nothing for four and a half years but can remain silent no longer. My belief is that only explosives could have caused WTC 1 & WTC 2 to collapse the way they did on September 11, 2001.

Leslie E. Robertson
Director Leslie E. Robertson Associates, R.L.L.P. and lead engineer of the World Trade Center
ROFLMAO, Chris my man, you really don't get it do you? It was a freaking April Fool's joke! You're supposed to laugh and move on... I can assure you that was not Robertson.

On second thought, you just being an obnoxious and determined (albeit pathetic) troll makes a lot more sense than the possibility that you actually believe this crap.
 
The documentary I saw mentioned the one you link to as celebrating the WTC completion but described itself as an intimate examination of the construction process of TWC 1. It was called "The Construction Of The Twin Towers" and was 2 hours in length.

No, not the same doc.

Then find the damn documentary and post a link.

Also, I'm still trying to understand how they could blow up the core, then the outer "tube" collapses, and THEN we see the core again. How does that work.

Also, for the eleventh time:

Would you care to post your own diagram of the hallway configuration for all to see ? This would surely help me understand, as well as others, how this whole thing works.
 
Answer the question you coward; you said there were steel core columns in the core of the tower, provide evidence for this or retract your claim that the core was comprised of multiple steel core columns.


I have provided evidence substantiating my claim. The fact that you dispute said evidence is not sufficient grounds to disprove it and warrant a withdrawal.

You on the other hand, have not provided evidence backing your claim that custom 3" rebar was used in the construction of the towers. Stop dodging the issue and provide evidence, or retract your claim that the rebar used was custom, and was of 3" diameter.
 
Last edited:
You guys are arguing w/ someone who either believes an April Fool's joke was actually a serious post, or is a troll.

Why bother?
 
70 pages...

This is on par with KT's Flight 93 thread. And Christophera is still going on about 5 inch twizzlers on 3 foot linoleum flooring (or whatever). Mad props for those trying to rescue him from his own stupidity, but I think it's pretty apparent you're just :bwall
 
After looking at it over and over, something about it seems real.

evidence and proof are now things where "something about it seems real."

He has got to be one of the most avid 9-11 lurkers of all. I mean if you bullt those towers and that happened to them, would you want to know the truth?

he designed the towers. he knows the truth.

if you knew or suspected the truth would you try and find a safe way for yourself to get it out?
The safest way is to broadcast it far and loud and become such a public figure that anything unsafe that happens to you becomes common knowledge. Sneaking about posting notes on a public internet forum would be a retarded way of doing this. Especially if you used your real name.

If some one like my self was arguing day in and day out proving what you know to be true, would you want to help?

We've recommended you get help several times. You really should look into it, you need it.

Then be torn between that and the potential risk to yourself and so use an ambigous moment like April fools day to give the truth to someone in away that protected you?

uh, no.

But I did not fabricate it. And I don't post it often because I don't know who it is that posted it originally, and then there's always some one such as yourself that will assume I made it myself and posted it,

I know longer believe you posted it, but whoever did was yanking your chain and you've drunk the koolaid so deeply you're drowning.

........ and there is so much good evidence so i don't need to
then it's about time you stopped showing pictures of dust and produced it.

I fabricate nothing and use only what is there, what is given (or I might take), reasonably and faithfully to the purpose of reason. Everything I do is honoring their memory and using what their deaths might mean to protect the live of the ones they loved, who loved them, from ever knowing anything like this again.

Nothing you've posted is honors the memory of anyone on 9/11. You're basically calling everyone involved retards for not noticing that their 3" rebar mysteriously went "somewhere" and came back coated in "something" none of which was in the specifications and they said nothing. Further your claim is that not once when they cut holes in floors or did maintainence work did they notice this weird substance on all the rebar.

Furthermore, every single documentary is wrong. Except this ONE that only you've seen but which proof on it's existance is zero.

So your claim is that everyone is lying, except you. Now that's honoring people, call them liars.

You haven't explained near free fall and pulverizaton,

These only need to be explained if they occured. how near to free fall do you believe the buildings fell. Where are your calculations for how fast it SHOULD have fallen.

How can you pulverize that which isn't there? I see lots of pictures of dust from destroyed drywall and destruction (not pulverization) of concrete floors. I'm not seeing any proof that the dust is concrete from a concrete core.
 
Christophera: How the hell could a piece of 3' rebar hundreds of feet tall stand unsupported for several seconds? It would crumple like a piece of string immediately.
 
Woody, dude ......... those are interior box columns, outside the core area. You are very confused.

No, they're not. Interior box columns are NOT, repeat, NOT horizontal.

Please stop reading the posts of other posters in this forum, they are working to confuse people.

Ah, yes. No one could possibly be a skeptic without beign a shill.

If you help them you'll be supporting the lie that murderers hide behind.

Appeal to emotion.
 
Please stop reading the posts of other posters in this forum, they are working to confuse people. If you help them you'll be supporting the lie that murderers hide behind.

Does it make you feel better to demonize people who disagree with you? You just accused forumites of intentionally aiding murderers. Jerk.

Hey, I know, maybe YOU are working to bring anarchy to America by destroying the government. All part of your plan to become an arms dealer.

Everyone, don't read Chris's posts. He is actively creating confusing so his organized crime buddies can make a profit.
 
Everyone, don't read Chris's posts. He is actively creating confusing so his organized crime buddies can make a profit.
I've been lurking in this thread ever since it started, but long ago gave up reading Christophera's posts. I haven't put him on ignore because every once in a while a post of his is quoted and I like to scroll back and see it in its context (well, as much as Christophera's posts have any context!)
If this thread ever dies, I suspect his 3" REBAR ON 4' CENTERS will become a catch-phrase among the readers of the CT section.
Actually, it has already ...
 
QUALITY evidence ? That's the funniest thing I've read all week.

You can barely see buildings in those pictures, let alone rebar.

Now, now. He didn't say what KIND of quality his evidence had. It certainly has a delusional quality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom