• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
So trying to change the past won't work there.



Easy for you to attempt dissmissal of a picture of the concrete core with a few unreasonable words convienent to your weak argument, but you have not explained why the supposed steel core columns of your poorly detailed diagram, not a plan are unseen in this and the other images.

What Core?
What rebar?
 
So trying to change the past won't work there.



Easy for you to attempt dissmissal of a picture of the concrete core with a few unreasonable words convienent to your weak argument, but you have not explained why the supposed steel core columns of your poorly detailed diagram, not a plan are unseen in this and the other images.
Try as I might, I have been unable to make out where the floor decks were connected to your concrete core in your picture of the "core". There should be dowels extending out from the core that tied into the deck - indeed there should be resteel galore dangling from the core. Surely if you can make out 3" resteel in your pictures you can point these out.
 
Proof is so much better than theory.



I guessed you missed it when I posted Hi-res pictures of the same scene.

996744f636c6ccc66.jpg


996744f636c74d8b9.jpg


996744f636c7b3cf9.jpg


Your 3" REBAR ON 4' CENTERS is actually whole floors 10-12 feet apart.
 
Last edited:
So trying to change the past won't work there.

No idea where "there" is, but you've provided no corroborating evidence that your memory is even close to accurate. All your memory is capable of producing are structurally unsound, physics defying, laugh inducing building designs. Your designs would not pass a high school engineering contest.

Easy for you to attempt dissmissal of a picture of the concrete core with a few unreasonable words convienent to your weak argument,

I can dismiss your picture as a picture of a concrete core for the same reason I can say there is no concrete core in this picture.

578944f5e3a50b942.gif


but you have not explained why the supposed steel core columns of your poorly detailed diagram, not a plan are unseen in this and the other images.

This makes no sense to me. Clean up your grammar a bit to produce something understandable and I'll respond.
 
I guessed you missed it when I posted Hi-res pictures of the same scene.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/996744f636c6ccc66.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/996744f636c74d8b9.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/996744f636c7b3cf9.jpg[/qimg]

Your 3" REBAR ON 4' CENTERS is actually whole floors 10-12 feet apart.

Did you provide a link to where you got those earlier? I'd like to see some more in a series from that.
 
Not whole floors and not columns of the core. What amanzafar's images show that you've posted are interior box columns and floor beams connecting them. Those columns are not inside the core.

Your contradicting yourself now. You image

996744f636ddc5213.jpg


Is labeled on your page

The below photo has a comb like shape of the remnant of the reinforcing bars of the core, briefly standing.

My images are hi-res of the exact same thing, but now, according to you, they only show "interior box columns and floor beams connecting them"

So which is it. Rebarb, or box columns, you cant have it both ways.
 
Woody:

You have any more of these photos, like after the dust settled a little. I noticed in one of them, WTC7 is visible on the top. It would be nice to see a few photos of this quality with more of WTC 7 visible.
 
Y
My images are hi-res of the exact same thing, but now, according to you, they only show "interior box columns and floor beams connecting them"

Interior box columns and floor beams ARE a steel core. Now he claims they had both a steel core and a concrete core? yeesh, i hope he never tries to build a swing set or assemble a bike.
 
I disagree...

[qimg]http://home.mindspring.com/~turniton/COTC/578944f5e3a50b942.jpg[/qimg]

And what about those strange markings on the ground?...

I think I can make out "Dust Clouds Rolling Over The Prairies", written in anamorphosis. But what does it mean? Somekind of code phrase?
 
I guessed you missed it when I posted Hi-res pictures of the same scene.

996744f636c6ccc66.jpg


996744f636c74d8b9.jpg


996744f636c7b3cf9.jpg


Your 3" REBAR ON 4' CENTERS is actually whole floors 10-12 feet apart.

Woody, dude ......... those are interior box columns, outside the core area. You are very confused.

Please stop reading the posts of other posters in this forum, they are working to confuse people. If you help them you'll be supporting the lie that murderers hide behind.
 
I guess you missed my post again so Ill ask my question again.

So which is it. Rebarb, or box columns, you cant have it both ways.

Your pic that according to you is rebarb.

996744f636ddc5213.jpg


My pic that according to you is box columns

996744f636c7b3cf9.jpg


Now look carefully at the dust clouds, even though mine is taken from a slightly different angle you can tell they were taken within seconds of each other. So are you telling me that rebar changed to box columns in a split-second?
 
Woody, dude ......... those are interior box columns, outside the core area. You are very confused.

Please stop reading the posts of other posters in this forum, they are working to confuse people. If you help them you'll be supporting the lie that murderers hide behind.


My pic and your pic show exactly the same thing taken seconds apart. It cant be rebarb in one and box columns in the other.
 
Steel Columns On Outside Concrete Shear Wall On Outside.

EDIT: Blew the title, can't edit that. It is supposed to read,

Steel Columns On Outside Concrete Shear Wall On Inside.

My pic and your pic show exactly the same thing taken seconds apart. It cant be rebarb in one and box columns in the other.

Sure it can, the steel is outside the concrete.

The steel we see in below the spire is slightly taller and has fallen away, as the concrete blew, to reveal the rebar that was at the center of the concrete behind the steel.
 
Last edited:
The steel we see in below the spire is slightly taller and has fallen away, as the concrete blew, to reveal the rebar that was at the center of the concrete behind the steel.

No, what you see is 20" columns. Tell you what, go buy a piece of 3" rebar stand a mile away and take a picture. Compare to the size in the photograph. They won't even be close.

And I like how you can pack explosives all around a piece of 3" rebar and blow it up so it only affects concrete and not the rebar itself.
 
Mr. Brown:

- What are your plans for presenting your evidence to one or more scientific journals?
- Will you apologize for your unprovoked attack on me?
- Will you retract the post you claim to be from Leslie E. Robertson?
- What "distortions" of mine are "visible?" Please provide quotes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom