Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Belz... said:
I'm still wondering how these people manage to breathe properly.
Click to expand...


My 14 yo son keeps getting invited to go to pakistan by his friend's uncle. His friend is from pakistan, and goes there often (several times a year to visit, and his sister's husband lives there-she went on a visit to concieve a child with him-weird), anyways, I'd like some of those deluded conspiracy theororists go off to pakistan instead to see why they want my son to go there so badly. I'm freaking paranoid :p Just an experiment, to see what happens.
 
brumsen said:
To the average Joe, Professor Jones is making an obscure political reference. What he is really doing, is placing himself on the right hand of the right hand of God.



OK - so what are we talking about here.

Is it about: who has control of the Scholars and its webpage? I agree that for the reasons given, it is likely that Jones has had a hand in this quote at least.

Or is it about: why did he pick that quote? Because of his religious beliefs. Or perhaps because of the perspective in which he sees what he's doing, informed by those religious beliefs. In other words, his take on the morality of what he's doing.
But aren't we dangerously close to ad hominem arguments here? "Look at the rabidly religious arrogant person Jones is... he must therefore be doing bad science".
I hope that this is not what was intended.
Click to expand...

In order to accuse Jones of bad science, what he is doing would have to be science to begin with. The most we could logically accuse him of is "bad religion". The "Scholars" are a religious cult as much as a scientific or academic group.

http://www.jod911.com/evidence2.pdf
 
Last edited:
JamesB said:
In order to accuse Jones of bad science, what he is doing would have to be science to begin with. The most we could logically accuse him of is "bad religion". The "Scholars" are a religious cult as much as a scientific or academic group.

http://www.jod911.com/evidence2.pdf
Click to expand...
Well put. His methodology and academic behavior are bad enough, but he (and others) tend to mix it with religious beliefs.
A powder keg for disaster.
 
Last edited:
Mancman said:
Forget bukkake, how about a torrential downpour of stupidity?

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=11643
Click to expand...

Hah! That reminds me of when I was a kid on long car trips, I'd see a water tower off in the distance and it would seem to be moving right along with us. Of course, what's really happening is that the angle of view to something close is changing much more rapidly than the angle of view to something far away.

What a bunch of fruitcakes!
 
If I could, well geez. I just watched some different angles of the 2nd plane hitting a tower. Are those guys stupid, blind, what? I don't get it. Why do they need to believe it was an "inside" job? Who do they think bin laden is? I'm watching this thread with morbid fascination, and I'm getting upset all over again.
 
JamesB said:
I didn't "miss" that, that was my point. I was wondering if anyone else would make the connection. Why else would someone be quoting an obscure Secretary of Agriculture? Obviously Jones put that up because of his religious beliefs.
Click to expand...

I'm impressed, James. "Who was the mormon prophet 20 years ago?" is at least as obscure as "Who was Secretary of Agriculture 50 years ago?". :)

But his religious beliefs are my religious beliefs. The mormon "Articles of Faith" state that "We believe in being honest". An admonition wich I'm fairly certain precludes fraudulently padding other peoples resumes to artificially inflate the viability of ones own pet theories. Every member of the church I have discussed Jones's behavior with (including another poster on this forum) has been offended at his antics. His attempt to put himself next to the prophet is crass and hypocritical given his recent actions.
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
I'm sorry, but after the latest round of being bukkaked by stupid over there, the cost has gone up to a ponykeg. :boggled:
Click to expand...

My humble apologies. I really should've warned you.

But dammit, you can't leave me alone over there. My only other ally was aquatus (someone should float an invite to this place by him), but they up and made him a mod, so now he has to be somewhat neutral.

I did see that Gravy made a brief appearance. Too bad he didn't stick around.
 
TK0001 said:
My humble apologies. I really should've warned you.

But dammit, you can't leave me alone over there. My only other ally was aquatus (someone should float an invite to this place by him), but they up and made him a mod, so now he has to be somewhat neutral.

I did see that Gravy made a brief appearance. Too bad he didn't stick around.
Click to expand...

I'm not bugging out just yet, but good grief thechadster, BZRK and An Urban Legend are like the Killtown Triplets. Though AROCES has his/her head on straight.
 
Eos of the Eons said:
Why do they need to believe it was an "inside" job?
Click to expand...

Because they hate the president. Admitting they're wrong would mean they would have to consider the fact that Dubya just might not be more of an evil madman than Ming the Merciless. This doesn't sit well with them.
 
WildCat said:
Bukkaked with stupid...
Click to expand...

That's one very disgusting expression, you know.

Brainster said:
Hah! That reminds me of when I was a kid on long car trips, I'd see a water tower off in the distance and it would seem to be moving right along with us. Of course, what's really happening is that the angle of view to something close is changing much more rapidly than the angle of view to something far away.
Click to expand...

I don't get it. Hasn't everyone in the whole wide world seen this effect thousands of times ?

So now, they think the bridge was ADDED to the footage ? WHY ?? Why would those NWO globalist jooos do this ?

Why are these guys to apt in using Smacco's Rozar ?
 
This is from the LC board, on deciding what countries to escape to! To aviod The NWO!

I'd vote for China because:

1. Noone is stupid enough to attack it.

2. In China bad things do not happen, at least not according to media and government.

3. Therefor there are no conspiracies.

4. No election frauds, China is no democracy so no need to vote.

5. In China there is birth control, so in case you get 'daddy' by accident, the girl most likely gets an abortus (most likely in the non-medical-support way) so you are free to move to the next girl.
Click to expand...

Priceless!

DT
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom